Style fixes mixed with content changes
Tests ability to squash style-fix commits with their related content commits. Evaluates separating cosmetic from functional changes.
Baseline Repository
These commands set up the repo before the model sees the prompt. They define the starting file structure, staged changes, and Git history.
- 01
git init - 02
git config user.email 'test@test.com' - 03
git config user.name 'Test User' - 04
echo 'def foo(): pass' > script.py - 05
git add script.py - 06
git commit -m 'Add function foo' - 07
echo 'def foo(): x=1' > script.py - 08
git add script.py - 09
git commit -m 'WIP: add logic' - 10
echo 'def foo(): x = 1' > script.py - 11
git add script.py - 12
git commit -m 'WIP: style fix' - 13
echo 'def foo(): x = 1 return x' > script.py - 14
git add script.py - 15
git commit -m 'Return value'
Prompt
Identify the WIP commits that should be marked as squash/fixup; these represent incremental implementation work that should be combined. Do not include the non-WIP anchor commits. Provide the commit messages.
Expected
WIP: add logic, WIP: style fix
Campaign Evidence
Loading campaign evidence…
Model Outputs (14)
WIP: style fix
WIP: add logic
Based on the commit history, the WIP commits that represent incremental work and should be squashed/fixup are:
- `885fa1b WIP: style fix`
- `514e21b WIP: add logic`
These two WIP commits appear to be incremental implementation work related to the anchor commit `688d87b Add function foo`. The commit `7fe3a7e Return value` is not a WIP commit and should not be included.
304fc92 WIP: style fix
61ae76d WIP: add logic
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commits":["304fc92 WIP: style fix","61ae76d WIP: add logic"]}
Based on the commit history provided, the WIP (Work In Progress) commits that should be marked as `squash` or `fixup` (since they represent incremental work that should be combined) are:
1. `166dc31 WIP: style fix`
2. `a9a4d25 WIP: add logic`
The non-WIP anchor commit (`ebc0c49 Add function foo`) should not be included in the squash/fixup list, as it represents a complete unit of work.
The newest commit (`b5ef63e Return value`) is also not a WIP commit, so it should not be marked for squashing unless it is part of the same logical change as the WIP commits.
### Commit messages to mark for squash/fixup:
- `WIP: style fix`
- `WIP: add logic`
Failure: Extra selected commit messages: ['Return value', 'Add function foo']
834383a WIP: style fix
c387a74 WIP: add logic
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commits": ["834383a WIP: style fix", "c387a74 WIP: add logic"]}
- WIP: style fix
- WIP: add logic
The WIP (Work In Progress) commits that should be marked as **squash/fixup** are those indicating incremental, non-final implementation work that should be combined into a single commit. Based on the provided git commit history, the relevant WIP commits are:
```
04f1c26 WIP: style fix
9eb1abb WIP: add logic
```
These commits are explicitly marked as "WIP" and represent partial, incremental work meant to be merged rather than preserved as standalone commits. The non-WIP anchor commit (`cdd40a1 Add function foo`) is not a WIP and should be excluded from the squash/fixup grouping, as it represents a completed commit.
**Answer:**
04f1c26 WIP: style fix
9eb1abb WIP: add logic
Failure: Extra selected commit messages: ['Add function foo']
608d758 WIP: style fix
e7bb1a0 WIP: add logic
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commits": [
"608d758 WIP: style fix",
"e7bb1a0 WIP: add logic"
]
}
Based on the commit history, the WIP commits that should be marked as squash/fixup are:
1. **84c5771 WIP: style fix**
2. **905165d WIP: add logic**
These represent incremental implementation work that should be combined with their corresponding anchor commits:
- "WIP: style fix" should likely be squashed/fixup with "Add function foo" (a6ac5eb)
- "WIP: add logic" should likely be squashed/fixup with "Add function foo" (a6ac5eb)
The non-WIP anchor commit "Return value" (5b3519b) was excluded as requested.
Failure: Extra selected commit messages: ['Add function foo']
03e5946
6a5e3de
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commits": ["03e5946", "6a5e3de"]}
Looking at the commit history, I can identify the WIP commits that should be marked as squash/fixup:
1. `WIP: style fix`
2. `WIP: add logic`
These two WIP commits represent incremental implementation work that should be combined with the main commit. The anchor commit `Add function foo` is the base implementation, and these WIP commits are incremental changes that should be squashed or fix-up'd into it.
Commit messages to mark as squash/fixup:
- WIP: style fix
- WIP: add logic
Failure: Extra selected commit messages: ['Add function foo']
882c736 WIP: style fix
729fc3b WIP: add logic
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commits": ["882c736 WIP: style fix", "729fc3b WIP: add logic"]}
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
style fix
add logic
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commits": [
"style fix",
"add logic"
]
}
Failure: Missing expected commit messages: ['WIP: add logic', 'WIP: style fix']