Multiple separate feature development commits
Tests ability to squash multiple separate feature-development commits into logical groups. Evaluates feature-level commit organization.
Baseline Repository
These commands set up the repo before the model sees the prompt. They define the starting file structure, staged changes, and Git history.
- 01
git init - 02
git config user.email 'test@test.com' - 03
git config user.name 'Test User' - 04
touch base.txt - 05
git add base.txt - 06
git commit -m 'Base commit' - 07
echo 'feat1a' > feature1.txt - 08
git add feature1.txt - 09
git commit -m 'WIP: start feature 1' - 10
echo 'feat1b' >> feature1.txt - 11
git add feature1.txt - 12
git commit -m 'WIP: continue feature 1' - 13
echo 'feat2a' > feature2.txt - 14
git add feature2.txt - 15
git commit -m 'Start feature 2'
Prompt
The second feature was done cleanly in one commit, but feature 1 has WIP commits that should be marked as squash/fixup. Identify only the WIP commits for feature 1 that should be combined. Do not include the clean feature 2 commit. Provide the commit messages.
Expected
WIP: start feature 1, WIP: continue feature 1
Campaign Evidence
Loading campaign evidence…
Model Outputs (14)
"WIP: start feature 1" and "WIP: continue feature 1"
Based on the request, the WIP commits for feature 1 that should be combined (squashed/fixup) are:
- `77b1d41 WIP: continue feature 1`
- `c524de9 WIP: start feature 1`
5cb2e0c WIP: continue feature 1
bd75c08 WIP: start feature 1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commits": ["5cb2e0c WIP: continue feature 1", "bd75c08 WIP: start feature 1"] }
Based on the git commit history provided, the WIP commits for feature 1 that should be combined (squashed/fixup) are:
1. `99d2a1a WIP: continue feature 1`
2. `d473830 WIP: start feature 1`
These are the only commits related to feature 1 that contain "WIP" in their messages and should be squashed together. The commit `93544bb Start feature 2` is for feature 2 and should not be included, as requested. The base commit `b19e8f4` is also not part of feature 1's development.
Failure: Extra selected commit messages: ['Start feature 2', 'Base commit']
f84d62e WIP: continue feature 1
580c00b WIP: start feature 1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commits": ["f84d62e WIP: continue feature 1", "580c00b WIP: start feature 1"]}
- WIP: continue feature 1
- WIP: start feature 1
WIP: continue feature 1
WIP: start feature 1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commits": [
"WIP: continue feature 1",
"WIP: start feature 1"
]
}
Based on your requirements to **only identify WIP commits for feature 1** (ignoring feature 2) and **provide their commit messages**, here's the precise analysis:
### Key Observations:
- The **clean feature 2 commit** (`b1cca79 Start feature 2`) is to be **excluded entirely**.
- **Feature 1 WIP commits** are commits marked with "WIP" *specifically related to feature 1* (not for feature 2).
- **Not all "WIP" commits involve feature 1** (e.g., a "WIP" commit for feature 2 would be irrelevant here).
### Commit Breakdown:
| SHA | Message | Reason to Include? |
|-------------|----------------------------------|-------------------|
| `b1cca79` | `Start feature 2` | ❌ **Feature 2** → Excluded per instructions. |
| `8ed5d19` | `WIP: continue feature 1` | ✅ **Feature 1** → Valid WIP commit to squash. |
| `f581008` | `WIP: start feature 1` | ✅ **Feature 1** → Valid WIP commit to squash. |
| `e561418` | `Base commit` | ❌ Not a WIP → Base commit (keep as-is). |
### Identified WIP Commits for Feature 1 (Only):
These are the **two commits** that need to be combined into a single commit. Their messages are exactly as written in the history.
> **Commit messages to squash/fixup**:
> `WIP: continue feature 1`
> `WIP: start feature 1`
### Why This Is Correct:
1. **Feature 1 WIP commits are isolated** to `f581008` and `8ed5d19` (both explicitly say "feature 1").
2. **Feature 2 is clean and excluded** (`b1cca79` is not a WIP commit and relates to feature 2).
3. **No other commits** involve feature 1 or are WIPs (e.g., `e561418` is a base commit, not WIP).
### Action Required:
When rewriting history, **only these two commit messages** should be considered for squashing/falshing. The final commit tree will merge them into one clean feature 1 commit (e.g., "Build feature 1 functionality").
> 💡 **Note**: The order in the history (newest first) means `8ed5d19` (continue feature 1) came *after* `f581008` (start feature 1). When squashing, the **earlier commit** (`f581008`) will typically be the base, and `8ed5d19` will be applied on top. But **only the messages** are requested here.
Failure: Extra selected commit messages: ['Start feature 2', 'Base commit']
WIP: continue feature 1
WIP: start feature 1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commits": [
"WIP: continue feature 1",
"WIP: start feature 1"
]
}
The WIP commits for feature 1 that should be marked as squash/fixup are:
1. **be2d8f9** - `WIP: continue feature 1`
2. **1719afc** - `WIP: start feature 1`
WIP: continue feature 1
WIP: start feature 1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commits": [
"WIP: continue feature 1",
"WIP: start feature 1"
]
}
Looking at the commit history, I can identify the WIP commits for feature 1 that should be combined:
1. `WIP: continue feature 1`
2. `WIP: start feature 1`
These two commits are marked as WIP and relate to feature 1, so they should be squashed or marked as fixup commits. The clean feature 2 commit (`Start feature 2`) and the base commit should remain separate.
Failure: Extra selected commit messages: ['Start feature 2', 'Base commit']
WIP: start feature 1
WIP: continue feature 1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commits": [
"WIP: start feature 1",
"WIP: continue feature 1"
]
}
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)