Linear history with bad commit at end - model identifies most recent commit as bad
Tests ability to identify the most recent commit as bad using git bisect on a linear history. Evaluates basic bisect with the bug at HEAD.
Baseline Repository
These commands set up the repo before the model sees the prompt. They define the starting file structure, staged changes, and Git history.
- 01
git init - 02
git config user.email 'test@test.com' - 03
git config user.name 'Test User' - 04
echo '#!/bin/bash' > test.sh - 05
echo 'grep "return a + b" src/index.js' >> test.sh - 06
chmod +x test.sh - 07
mkdir -p src && echo 'function add(a, b) { return a + b; }' > src/index.js - 08
git add test.sh src/index.js - 09
git commit -m 'Initial commit' - 10
echo '// feature X enabled' >> src/index.js - 11
git add src/index.js - 12
git commit -m 'add feature X' - 13
echo 'function add(a, b) { return a - b; }' > src/index.js - 14
git add src/index.js - 15
git commit -m 'change add operation'
Prompt
You are debugging a git repository. The following commit history has one bad commit that broke the build. Identify the bad commit hash (first 7 characters) or commit subject line that introduced the bug. Use the git log and test output to determine which commit is bad.
Your answer should be the commit hash (e.g., 'abc1234') or the commit subject line.
Expected
change add operation
Fixture Metrics
Scoped model quality, cost, API time, and token usage for git_bisect/f001.
Loading...
Raw Attempt Evidence
Loading raw attempt evidence…
Model Outputs (546)
**Bad commit: `b84b63b` — "change add operation"**
**Reasoning:**
- `df15b48` (Initial commit): PASS ✅
- `5460079` (add feature X): PASS ✅
- `b84b63b` (change add operation): FAIL ❌
The tests passed on every commit up to and including `5460079`, then first failed at `b84b63b`. Since it's the first failing commit, it introduced the bug that broke the build.
50b718b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "50b718b"}
The bad commit is **dc0716d** ("change add operation") — the last passing commit is d94503f, and tests first fail at dc0716d.
163151b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "163151b"}
**Bad commit: `b19aa6d` — "change add operation"**
**Reasoning (bisect logic):**
| Commit | Subject | Test Result |
|--------|---------|-------------|
| 8712595 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 71b36cb | add feature X | ✅ PASS |
| b19aa6d | change add operation | ❌ FAIL |
The build passed at `71b36cb` and first failed at `b19aa6d`, making `b19aa6d` the first bad commit — it introduced the regression when the add operation was changed.
c91b1ce
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c91b1ce"}
The bad commit is **d139031** ("change add operation").
Reasoning: Tests pass at `e77e966` (Initial commit) and `1286354` (add feature X), but fail starting at `d139031`. Since it's the first failing commit, it introduced the bug.
8c5bd4d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "8c5bd4d"}
**Bad commit: `0c0f56b` — "change add operation"**
**Reasoning:**
- `747d04f` (Initial commit): PASS ✅
- `c8d7c98` (add feature X): PASS ✅
- `0c0f56b` (change add operation): FAIL ❌
The tests passed on every commit up through `c8d7c98` and first failed at `0c0f56b`. Since the build was green immediately before it and red immediately after, `0c0f56b` ("change add operation") is the commit that introduced the bug — likely by modifying the add operation's behavior in a way that broke existing tests.
012bbde
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "012bbde"}
# Analysis
Looking at the test results chronologically:
1. **c6e3201** (Initial commit) → ✅ PASS
2. **99eb014** (add feature X) → ✅ PASS
3. **46a2370** (change add operation) → ❌ FAIL (exit code 1)
The bad commit is clearly the one where the tests first failed.
**Answer: 46a2370** (or "change add operation")
f76c7ba
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "f76c7ba"}
# Bad Commit Identified
**7a8a412** (or "change add operation")
This is the first commit where the tests failed (exit code 1). The previous commits (4c20a05 and 95f9235) both passed their tests, so the bug was introduced in this commit.
ea75f32
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ea75f32"}
# Analysis
Looking at the test results:
1. **0e0b015** (Initial commit): **PASS** ✓
2. **76d40f8** (add feature X): **PASS** ✓
3. **a59a721** (change add operation): **FAIL** ✗
The first commit where the build breaks is `a59a721`.
**Answer: a59a721** (or "change add operation")
94c54cf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "94c54cf"}
The bad commit is **a86d8d4** (or "change add operation").
Based on the test results:
- cd03a49 (Initial commit): PASS
- 5ffb5e5 (add feature X): PASS
- a86d8d4 (change add operation): FAIL
The commit "change add operation" is the first one to fail the build, making it the commit that introduced the bug.
1b9fb96
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "1b9fb96"}
# Bad Commit Analysis
Looking at the test results:
- **179ddcb** (Initial commit): ✅ PASS
- **733f4ef** (add feature X): ✅ PASS
- **e2b0266** (change add operation): ❌ FAIL
The first failing test occurs at commit **e2b0266**, which is when the build broke.
**Answer: `e2b0266`** (or "change add operation")
ebb4198
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ebb4198"}
The bad commit is **05f6076** ("change add operation").
27ceb1d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"27ceb1d"}
4db51a3
795fbb6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"795fbb6"}
**Bad commit: `1fbc341`** (subject: *change add operation*)
**Reasoning:** The test results clearly show:
- `3d3ea53` (Initial commit) → **PASS**
- `581aa12` (add feature X) → **PASS**
- `1fbc341` (change add operation) → **FAIL**
The build was passing up through `581aa12`, and the first failure occurs at `1fbc341`, making it the commit that introduced the bug.
d8d7569
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d8d7569"}
7efccfb
a960830
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a960830"}
The bad commit is **739399e** ("change add operation").
378128c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"378128c"}
The bad commit is **455545d** ("change add operation").
9af3037
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"9af3037"}
852bbe1
b342fb0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b342fb0"}
b0ff521
f657801
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f657801"}
Looking at the test results, I can identify the bad commit by finding where the tests transition from PASS to FAIL:
- `e59b2d1` Initial commit: **PASS**
- `10bbd1e` add feature X: **PASS**
- `fba6380` change add operation: **FAIL** ← First failing commit
**Bad commit: `fba6380` ("change add operation")**
This commit introduced the bug, as it's the first commit where the tests fail while the immediately preceding commit (`10bbd1e`) still passed.
47ce025
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"47ce025"}
8ada33c
83fa8d8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"83fa8d8"}
2e1b183
3894946
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"3894946"}
7a02c6d
1030f20
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1030f20"}
**Bad commit: `91903aa` — "change add operation"**
Looking at the test results across the commit history:
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| bdac5dd | Initial commit | PASS |
| 9c1efd2 | add feature X | PASS |
| 91903aa | change add operation | **FAIL** |
The build was passing through commit `9c1efd2` ("add feature X") and broke at commit `91903aa` ("change add operation"). Since this is the first commit where the test transitions from PASS to FAIL, **`91903aa`** is the commit that introduced the bug.
c5d1b2b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c5d1b2b"}
03cebb9
df25d98
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "df25d98"}
The bad commit is **`06fdd9f`** ("change add operation").
**Reasoning:**
Looking at the test results in chronological order (oldest first):
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| `4bf04df` | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| `d66b829` | add feature X | ✅ PASS |
| `06fdd9f` | change add operation | ❌ FAIL |
The build was passing through commit `d66b829`, but the very next commit `06fdd9f` ("change add operation") is where the tests first fail. Since this is the transition point from PASS → FAIL, `06fdd9f` is the commit that introduced the bug.
**Suggested next step:** Inspect the changes with `git show 06fdd9f` to see exactly what was modified in the "add operation" logic that broke the build.
4fbddc4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4fbddc4"}
**25aea37** ("change add operation")
This is the bad commit. The test results show a clear transition from PASS to FAIL:
- `c6d36ac` Initial commit: **PASS**
- `e547912` add feature X: **PASS**
- `25aea37` change add operation: **FAIL** ← bug introduced here
Since `25aea37` is the first commit where the build breaks (exit code 1), and its parent `e547912` still passes, the bug was introduced in commit `25aea37`.
2bd1807
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "2bd1807"}
The bad commit is **cfe9f11** ("change add operation").
**Reasoning:**
- `037f971` (Initial commit): PASS
- `690077e` (add feature X): PASS
- `cfe9f11` (change add operation): FAIL
The build passed at `690077e` and broke at `cfe9f11`, making `cfe9f11` the commit that introduced the bug.
4c8d516
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4c8d516"}
**Bad commit: `dc901c2` — "change add operation"**
**Reasoning:**
Looking at the test results in chronological order (oldest to newest):
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| `2c2a9f6` | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| `c5b30a2` | add feature X | ✅ PASS |
| `dc901c2` | change add operation | ❌ FAIL |
The build was passing through `c5b30a2` ("add feature X") and only started failing at `dc901c2` ("change add operation"). Since this is the transition point from PASS to FAIL, the bug was introduced in:
**`dc901c2`** (change add operation)
The subject line ("change add operation") also strongly suggests a modification to arithmetic/add logic that likely broke the tests.
417f532
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "417f532"}
The bad commit is `5ef3cf7`
1c3a74f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1c3a74f"}
1e4499d
57379d5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"57379d5"}
## Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| `c35bd5d` | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| `9411863` | add feature X | ✅ PASS |
| `3eb3e45` | change add operation | ❌ FAIL |
The first two commits pass, and the build breaks at the third commit (`3eb3e45`).
## Bad Commit
**`3eb3e45`**
This commit ("change add operation") is the one that introduced the bug, as it's the first commit where the build fails (exit code 1), while all previous commits passed successfully.
2591827
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2591827"}
`133241d`
830e9a5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"830e9a5"}
The bad commit is **9ec164e**
fed7b55
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"fed7b55"}
The bad commit is `4e29862`.
e74da91
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e74da91"}
**89c904b** ("change add operation") is the bad commit.
Reasoning: The test results progress bisection-style from oldest to newest. Both `d1deb25` (Initial commit) and `c631cfd` (add feature X) pass, but `89c904b` (change add operation) fails with exit code 1. Since this is the first commit where the test suite fails, and the previous commit passed, the bug was introduced in `89c904b`.
c4d3db2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c4d3db2"}
de00b27
04e9225
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"04e9225"}
9e3ce44 - change add operation
d37ee88
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d37ee88"}
b6fb384
fb84adc
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"fb84adc"}
**849ff73** (commit subject: "change add operation")
This commit is the bad commit. Based on the test results:
- `b5b9d86` (Initial commit): PASS
- `b05fcf8` (add feature X): PASS
- `849ff73` (change add operation): **FAIL**
Since the build passed through the first two commits and only failed after `849ff73` was applied, this commit introduced the breaking change. You can confirm this by inspecting the diff:
```bash
git show 849ff73
```
This will show the specific changes made to the "add operation" logic that likely introduced a bug (e.g., an off-by-one error, incorrect operator, or logic flaw in an addition function).
To fix this, you could either:
1. Revert the commit: `git revert 849ff73`
2. Or inspect the diff and patch the specific issue introduced in the add operation logic.
214e692
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "214e692"}
The bad commit is the one that introduced the failure: `111f320` (the first 7 characters of the commit hash) or the subject line "change add operation". Based on the test results, this commit caused the build to fail.
c1c5568
046973e
ff911eb
e328528
d5f5da3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d5f5da3"
}
5b9eea8
c8daabb change add operation
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "c8daabb change add operation"
}
326314e
The bad commit is `326314e` (change add operation), as it's the only commit that failed the test (exit code 1). All previous commits passed (exit code 0).
f6b237e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "f6b237e"
}
af88153
1090c30
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit":"1090c30"
}
9ea3931
2a2339c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "2a2339c" }
8b84462
47a0558
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "47a0558"
}
6eb3e39
9ec6ffd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"9ec6ffd" }
839a5b5
547af31
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "547af31"
}
7ad496f
3c360a7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "3c360a7"
}
8345078
28c7073
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "28c7073" }
7b56aba
902bfe6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"902bfe6"}
8f2b79c
74bd2ce
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"74bd2ce"}
8d55f0d
5a44dfd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "5a44dfd"}
822837a
156a021
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "156a021" }
9884c73
c09b65d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c09b65d"}
Based on the test results, the bad commit is:
**dab356b**
The commit history shows that:
- `ad61a8a Initial commit` - PASS
- `2f19fa3 add feature X` - PASS
- `dab356b change add operation` - FAIL
Since the tests passed on the first two commits and failed on the last one, the bug was introduced in `dab356b`.
628dfad
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "628dfad"}
26af303
9dbe258
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "9dbe258"
}
The bad commit is **d280a6a** (or the subject line "change add operation").
Here's the reasoning:
- The test results show that the initial commit (327b965) passed.
- The next commit (5dbec85) also passed.
- The most recent commit (d280a6a) failed with exit code 1.
Since the failure first appears at commit d280a6a, that's the commit that introduced the bug.
c8f78a5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c8f78a5"}
Based on the test results, the bad commit is:
**be36450**
This commit "change add operation" is the one that introduced the bug, as it's the first commit where the tests failed (exit code 1), while all previous commits passed successfully.
f77608f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "f77608f"}
fdccc42
d31ce7e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d31ce7e"}
The bad commit is **6a0d6ea** (change add operation).
56c1c2b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"56c1c2b"}
The bad commit is **691b201** (or "change add operation").
6251931
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "6251931"}
c904b6c
eb9c285
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"eb9c285"}
14d7d04
d2c7f2b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d2c7f2b"}
ac047c2
2427aa9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "2427aa9"
}
The bad commit is **23f7760** (or "change add operation").
**Explanation:**
By looking at the test results in order:
* `c926f81` (Initial commit) passed.
* `3ba765d` (add feature X) passed.
* `23f7760` (change add operation) failed.
Since the build passed at `3ba765d` but failed at the next commit `23f7760`, the bug was introduced by `23f7760`.
fbe177d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "fbe177d"}
The bad commit is **49ba378** (change add operation).
994f508
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "994f508"}
The bad commit is **84da023**.
51d4e1f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"51d4e1f"}
db27007
aa3e886
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "aa3e886"}
Based on the test results provided, the commit that broke the build is the first one to fail the test.
The bad commit hash is **6c4101c** (or the subject line **change add operation**).
3473cc0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "3473cc0"
}
The bad commit hash that introduced the bug is **722bec9** (or by subject line: **change add operation**).
As shown in the test results, this is the first commit where the test output goes from PASS to FAIL.
6bd3393
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6bd3393"}
41e1a03
870b934
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"870b934"}
7641fa5
24daa15
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "24daa15"
}
9de8f63
4a35dad
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "4a35dad"
}
4423083
4a72d8d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4a72d8d"}
d29d991
8fac223
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "8fac223"}
b0d23c2
f6882c3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "f6882c3"
}
aff97c6
94cf2f4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"94cf2f4"}
The commit that broke the build is **11c6676** (or "change add operation").
9ca5aac
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "9ca5aac"
}
The commit that broke the build is **9028913** (change add operation).
2357535
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "2357535"}
The bad commit is **cd7487e** (or the subject line "change add operation").
eb5e99a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"eb5e99a"}
**b38e2d6** (change add operation)
9a79ade
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"9a79ade"}
The bad commit is **9615421** (subject line: "change add operation").
a654d39
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "a654d39"
}
`d5c20be`
ca07807
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ca07807"}
The bad commit is **fc274d3** (subject line: "change add operation").
6eccfa7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6eccfa7"}
**d3fe8a5** (change add operation)
7232a5c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7232a5c"}
3344535
32d6167
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "32d6167"
}
a904355
12f53ef
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "12f53ef"}
4ccfdbe
4c48715
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "4c48715"
}
2d308bd
50b5e79
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "50b5e79"
}
1e63cd3
fa130c4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "fa130c4"
}
e871895
3d21126
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "3d21126"}
4baaaef
e26ccc8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e26ccc8"}
9a981a9
1930bde
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1930bde"}
ea6abe6
ad42f23
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ad42f23"}
3ee83bf
86f9d22
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "86f9d22"}
The bad commit is `feeeef4`, identified by the failing test result for that commit.
**Answer:** `feeeef4`
41171c5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "41171c5" }
The bad commit is the one that caused the test to fail. Based on the test results:
- `d6846e4 Initial commit`: PASS
- `5bf5b3b add feature X`: PASS
- `6a79079 change add operation`: FAIL
The commit that introduced the bug is the one that immediately precedes the failing test. Since the test fails after `6a79079 change add operation`, that commit is the culprit.
**Answer:**
`6a79079` (or "change add operation")
The bad commit is **8c4efdb**.
**Explanation:**
The commit history is shown newest first, so the most recent commit is `8c4efdb`. The test output shows it as failing (`FAIL`), while all earlier commits passed. Therefore, `8c4efdb` introduced the bug.
Answer: **8c4efdb**
The bad commit is the most recent one: **11f9021** (“change add operation”).
6141dca
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "6141dca" }
5bd33c1
6b8db9b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "6b8db9b"
}
c924121
d1e50c1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d1e50c1"
}
0ae462e change add operation
c390ae1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "c390ae1"
}
d1d4178
49507d8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "49507d8"}
792c7bc
404c1bb
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"404c1bb"}
f33fb4b
a26f925
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a26f925"}
e924838
a73ceff
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a73ceff"}
31450da
2e36f09
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "2e36f09" }
892410f
af927fe
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "af927fe" }
**d3c0e1c** (change add operation)
4b0f9d2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "4b0f9d2" }
d46b1ce
617af9f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "617af9f" }
Based on the git commit history and test results, the bad commit that broke the build is:
**d24e6df** (or "change add operation")
This is the only commit that resulted in a test failure (exit code 1), while all previous commits passed.
f9cb1be
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "f9cb1be"}
The bad commit is the newest one that introduced the failure. Given the test results, `bde3e76` (change add operation) is the first commit with a FAIL status, while all prior commits (including `c6ffa76` and `de613d2`) passed.
**Answer:** bde3e76
690d6f3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "690d6f3"}
The test results show that commit **81ea46c** (add feature X) passed, but the next commit **8a4c568** (change add operation) failed. Therefore, the bad commit is **8a4c568**.
8a4c568
dcd0ce8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "dcd0ce8"}
The commit that introduced the bug is the first one that caused a test failure. Since the oldest commits (9f9b8eb and a567bc4) passed, and the newest commit (07c9d5e) failed, the bad commit is:
07c9d5e
03b91e9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "03b91e9"}
Based on the test results provided, the bad commit is the one where the tests started failing.
- `35b0fae Initial commit`: PASS
- `0674903 add feature X`: PASS
- `e26758c change add operation`: FAIL
The first commit that introduced the failure is `e26758c change add operation`.
**Answer:** `e26758c`
af927fe
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "af927fe"}
The bad commit is the first one that introduced a build failure, which is the newest commit in the history. Since the test for `f105ff4` ("change add operation") failed while all prior commits passed, the broken commit is:
f105ff4
e869262
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "e869262"}
4d5a85e
change add operation
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "change add operation"
}
03c984f
bfb00f7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw)
{
"commit": "bfb00f7"
}
88ecee0
d07bd69
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw)
{
"commit": "d07bd69"
}
08d8cc3
bcd3269
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "bcd3269" }
The bad commit is **72b4d72** (“change add operation”).
2e4ce35
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "2e4ce35" }
The bad commit is **`38d876c`** (“change add operation”).
0566fb7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "0566fb7"}
a73778d
06b63f4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "06b63f4" }
The bad commit is:
**bc8bfa4** — *change add operation*
**Bad commit: `7f62c2e` — "change add operation"**
**Reasoning:**
Walking through the commits chronologically (oldest to newest):
1. `a2fcf7a` (Initial commit) — **PASS** ✓
2. `e484909` (add feature X) — **PASS** ✓
3. `7f62c2e` (change add operation) — **FAIL** ✗
Since commit `e484909` is the **last known good** commit and `7f62c2e` is the **first known bad** commit, the bug was introduced by `7f62c2e` ("change add operation"). This is exactly the transition point where the build went from passing to failing — the changes made to the add operation in that commit broke the build.
To fix it, you could inspect the changes with:
```bash
git show 7f62c2e
```
or revert it with:
```bash
git revert 7f62c2e
```
**Bad commit: `c80cae2` ("change add operation")**
**Reasoning:**
- `75c17db` (Initial commit) → PASS
- `a16712c` (add feature X) → PASS
- `c80cae2` (change add operation) → **FAIL**
Since the build passed at `a16712c` and first failed at `c80cae2`, the commit `c80cae2` is the one that introduced the bug. This is essentially what `git bisect` would conclude: the transition point between the last known-good commit and the first known-bad commit identifies `c80cae2` as the culprit. Given its subject line ("change add operation"), the bug likely stems from a modification to an addition function — worth checking that diff for issues like incorrect operator logic, changed argument order, or type mismatches.
The bad commit is **aae1fdd** — "change add operation".
The two earlier commits (9d6f3d8 and 9bf8d65) both pass, and aae1fdd is the first commit where the build fails, so it's the one that introduced the bug.
1d26cdf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1d26cdf"}
**Bad commit: `fdf4584` ("change add operation")**
**Reasoning:**
- `da8f47e` (Initial commit) → **PASS**
- `939e126` (add feature X) → **PASS**
- `fdf4584` (change add operation) → **FAIL**
Since the build passes at `939e126` and fails at the very next commit, `fdf4584` is the commit that introduced the bug. The subject line "change add operation" is also consistent with this — modifying existing core logic is a common source of regressions.
**Suggested next steps:**
- Inspect the change: `git show fdf4584`
- Revert it if needed: `git revert fdf4584`
- Or check out the last known-good commit: `git checkout 939e126`
The bad commit is **`42c2e37`** ("change add operation").
**Reasoning:**
- `164cf2b` (Initial commit): PASS
- `ab10f9e` (add feature X): PASS
- `42c2e37` (change add operation): **FAIL**
Since `ab10f9e` was the last passing commit and `42c2e37` is the first failing commit, the bug was introduced in `42c2e37` — the commit that changed the add operation.
**Bad commit: `05652cf` — "change add operation"**
Reasoning:
- `88ae5f6` (Initial commit): PASS
- `3891751` (add feature X): PASS
- `05652cf` (change add operation): FAIL ← first failing commit
Since the build passes at `3891751` and first fails at `05652cf`, the bug was introduced in commit **`05652cf`** ("change add operation").
**Bad commit: `298f4aa` — "change add operation"**
**Reasoning:**
- `36af918` (Initial commit): PASS ✅
- `7455d49` (add feature X): PASS ✅
- `298f4aa` (change add operation): FAIL ❌
The build passed through `7455d49` but fails at `298f4aa`, so `298f4aa` is the first bad commit — the one that introduced the bug. The subject line "change add operation" is also a hint: modifying the `add` operation likely broke existing functionality that depended on its original behavior.
**Bad commit: `f404208` — "change add operation"**
**Reasoning:**
- `f6fd7fb` (Initial commit): PASS ✅
- `7c16b66` (add feature X): PASS ✅
- `f404208` (change add operation): FAIL ❌
Since the build passed on the first two commits and only started failing at `f404208`, that commit is the one that introduced the bug.
**Bad commit: `0ffa9e2` ("change add operation")**
Reasoning:
- `b50d957` (Initial commit): PASS
- `408d869` (add feature X): PASS
- `0ffa9e2` (change add operation): **FAIL**
Since the build passed at `408d869` and first fails at `0ffa9e2`, the commit `0ffa9e2` ("change add operation") is the one that introduced the bug. As the subject line suggests, this commit modified the add operation — that's the most likely place to look for the regression (e.g., an incorrect change to the addition logic).
c84caec
549b456
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "549b456" }
cb43b67
af0477c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "af0477c" }
68fabbf
375c64e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "375c64e" }
abc1234
**Commit Subject:** `change add operation`
0f33014 change add operation
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "0f33014 change add operation"
}
40c11b7
d5344b1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d5344b1"
}
05e9c78
99b2530
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "99b2530"
}
59b0117
e3d3114
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "e3d3114"
}
c395e5d
74dc43a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "74dc43a"
}
1808ba9
87a18fe
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "87a18fe"}
1e8c451
9b31667
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9b31667" }
b047b21
ef661f2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ef661f2"}
586c97f
b295ddf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b295ddf"}
775a2f6
598b435
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"598b435"}
253f0bf
f1b8ed2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f1b8ed2"}
e28811a
7844c39
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7844c39"}
1faa80f
6b9544a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6b9544a"}
d1c5b7a
401ac91
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"401ac91"}
ac82192
c2c1954
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c2c1954"}
717893a
97855e1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"97855e1"}
3b5a722
35e5907
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"35e5907"}
1b0450e
d5bf283
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d5bf283"}
268d289
d8b3eec
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d8b3eec"}
1eb2811
a000b05
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a000b05"}
122a359
0e9acf1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"0e9acf1"}
372ea36
525bc8c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"525bc8c"}
b089a6f
8a5d513
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8a5d513"}
37a3aff
c21cf9f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c21cf9f"}
4b41761
12c783d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"12c783d"}
5b372fe
97f1fb9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"97f1fb9"}
1c8870b
eedca33
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"eedca33"}
e0cbd28
3354283
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"3354283"}
5e7e0d0
f5beaa3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f5beaa3"}
1991351
7544b04
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7544b04"}
12ee7f0
624491a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"624491a"}
f952be8
468acf4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"468acf4"}
482f517
fdc54d6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"fdc54d6"}
e1869ec
8a9b402
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8a9b402"}
3604f0c
3b2884f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"3b2884f"}
5aefba8
5deabaa
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5deabaa"}
b17cadb
826cef4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"826cef4"}
8aa8819
f57330e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f57330e"}
ce8d9ec
226c555
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"226c555"}
4bb5817
d68e97f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d68e97f"}
29fb6a3
8ef0b2b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8ef0b2b"}
f369bfb
e46a35b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e46a35b"}
a767127
2c02809
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2c02809"}
8599a74
44a5296
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"44a5296"}
483d6d1
392aadf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"392aadf"}
97d0585
9bfc8e7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9bfc8e7" }
e0b3c40
71bc8b6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "71bc8b6" }
445d5b3
8ff2954
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "8ff2954" }
279fe6e
430f6a8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"430f6a8"}
cf77b76
dade3a5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "dade3a5" }
340af50 change add operation
1696468
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1696468"}
c19f172 (the commit that introduced the bug)
bf2deb5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "bf2deb5" }
The failing commit is **a95ba7a** (“change add operation”).
b0eb304
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit" : "b0eb304" }
12efa74
63ffc47
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "63ffc47"}
6588214
7e2cce8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "7e2cce8"}
d72563d
4badab0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "4badab0"
}
Looking at the test results, I can see that commits were tested from oldest to newest:
- c66c76c Initial commit: PASS
- 8efcb97 add feature X: PASS
- 007d0bb change add operation: FAIL
Since the tests are listed oldest to newest and only the newest commit fails, the bad commit must be the one that broke the build. The commit 007d0bb "change add operation" is the first commit where the tests started failing.
The answer is: 007d0bb
abd3102
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "abd3102"}
b2b79cf
c1e7446
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c1e7446"}
The bad commit is `af9f0db` (change add operation). The test results show that the build passed for all prior commits (0a3d341 and 2a9275d) but failed after the commit `af9f0db`, which introduced the breaking change.
**Answer:** af9f0db
17ca578
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "17ca578"
}
The bad commit is 03f5fe0.
The test results show that the first two commits (2f071af and eab1015) pass, but the third commit (03f5fe0) fails. Since the build was working before this commit, it is the one that introduced the bug.
Answer: 03f5fe0
9873327
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "9873327"
}
835f44f
d32966d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d32966d"}
c0042da
3896bd4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "3896bd4"
}
The bad commit is identified by the test failure introduced in the latest commit before the failure. Since the test passed for the first two commits (12f4bba and 037bf09) and failed at 3bba597, this commit must be the one that broke the build.
**Answer:** 3bba597
02e4327
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "02e4327"
}
Based on the test results, I can see that:
- `bb75ac4` (Initial commit): PASS
- `427997d` (add feature X): PASS
- `6ded50d` (change add operation): FAIL
The bad commit is **6ded50d** - "change add operation" as it's the first commit that introduced test failures.
2ef9d6e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "2ef9d6e"
}
Based on the test results:
- Commit `d22dfc0` (Initial commit): PASS
- Commit `b29f7f5` (add feature X): PASS
- Commit `de8b857` (change add operation): FAIL
The bad commit is **de8b857** (or "change add operation"). This commit introduced the bug that caused the build to fail, as it's the first commit in the history where tests failed.
7c21033
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "7c21033"}
Based on the test results:
- de0b6dd Initial commit: PASS
- 6d62a8f add feature X: PASS
- ef81f76 change add operation: FAIL
The bad commit is **ef81f76** ("change add operation") which is the first commit to introduce the build failure.
7dc028e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "7dc028e"
}
Looking at the test results:
- 9e062d0 Initial commit: PASS ✓
- 7f36037 add feature X: PASS ✓
- 99d0a64 change add operation: FAIL ✗
The commit "change add operation" (99d0a64) is the bad commit that introduced the bug, as it's the first commit where the tests fail.
**Answer: 99d0a64**
ec9a9f4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ec9a9f4"}
Based on the test results, I can see that:
- Commit e2f56e5 (Initial commit): PASS
- Commit 442e713 (add feature X): PASS
- Commit a4dd017 (change add operation): FAIL
The bad commit is **a4dd017** with the subject line **"change add operation"** - this is the first commit where the tests failed, indicating it introduced the bug.
d090371
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d090371"}
422f638
0100e47
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "0100e47"
}
48ca2c2
74fa02e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "74fa02e"
}
b3999bf
912d53b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "912d53b"
}
b619bbb
d630977
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d630977"
}
80e197a
53501a7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "53501a7"
}
5c6cd1b
76178f1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "76178f1"
}
1d70c8d
0bbf75a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "0bbf75a"
}
0ed9d63
3868fee
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "3868fee" }
f963b61
fa9bfd6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "fa9bfd6"
}
f50ca0c
366c86a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "366c86a"
}
6a0936f
e6e8ffb
e91304f
6d60876
7448fba
fec0835
924ff69
5850a26
a869fec
86d2a29
3e64232
912feae
39a63a5
The bad commit is **aa2bf65** ("change add operation").
**Reasoning:** The test results show that commits `f16183a` and `7d0fd46` both passed, but `aa2bf65` failed. This means the bug was introduced in `aa2bf65`, which is the first commit where the build broke.
1febe3f
835c05a
c396876
The bad commit is **2a40b7d** ("change add operation").
The test results show that:
- `e8609a2` (Initial commit): PASS
- `6e2bbcd` (add feature X): PASS
- `2a40b7d` (change add operation): **FAIL**
The build broke when the code transitioned from a passing state at `6e2bbcd` to a failing state at `2a40b7d`, making `2a40b7d` the offending commit.
The bad commit that introduced the bug is:
**0fdc2c0** ("change add operation")
Here's the reasoning:
- `31046d9` (Initial commit) → PASS ✅
- `e89603c` (add feature X) → PASS ✅
- `0fdc2c0` (change add operation) → FAIL ❌
The test results show that everything was working fine up to `e89603c`. The next commit, `0fdc2c0` ("change add operation"), is the first one where the test fails, making it the commit that broke the build.
d9d5145
The bad commit is **`4d1059c`** ("change add operation").
Here's the reasoning:
- `b070e70` (Initial commit) — **PASS**
- `3d1778f` (add feature X) — **PASS**
- `4d1059c` (change add operation) — **FAIL**
Since the build was passing at `3d1778f` and failed at `4d1059c`, the commit **`4d1059c`** is the first bad commit that introduced the bug. This commit's "change add operation" broke the build.
83a0446
a8720c6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "a8720c6" }
02aa4fa
1f2c192
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "1f2c192" }
e308dfd
5a6a7c1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "5a6a7c1" }
f17a577
688954f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "688954f"
}
134b4d4
87e76bd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "87e76bd" }
a5e60f9
c529f1a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c529f1a"}
df44053
e0f9629
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "e0f9629"
}
8cd7dca
17f72c4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "17f72c4" }
1f82c1c
7e04cb1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7e04cb1"}
b366951<|end_message|>
The bad commit is **6bc233c** (subject: "change add operation").
It is the first commit where the test fails (FAIL), while its parent 2c63135 passes.
fe88ca6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "fe88ca6" }
99a79c1
59816bb
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "59816bb" }
e5c8e4a
The bad commit is **1b2afcc** (subject: "change add operation"), since it is the first commit in the history where the test fails.
977c38d
dac17b9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "dac17b9"}
f8f0a23
55464e0
a39b26b
a119580
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a119580"}
a7be37f
The test results show passing status on the two oldest commits, with a failure isolated to the newest one. This directly identifies a7be37f (subject "change add operation") as the sole commit that introduced the breaking change. No binary search or further git-bisect simulation is required, because the provided per-commit outcomes already pinpoint the regression.
5c716b2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5c716b2"}
48281e1
03ed572
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"03ed572"}
The test results show that commits 11985dc and 29d8d06 both exit successfully (status 0). Only the newest commit, 4fabc73, produces a failing exit status. Because the repository was known to be good before that commit and the failure occurs exactly at that commit, 4fabc73 is the first bad commit that introduced the bug.
Final answer: 4fabc73
3fae5b4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "3fae5b4"
}
175dd14
4398918
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"4398918"}
7c82cff
90d4bfc
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"90d4bfc"}
372856b
4e57ad5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"4e57ad5"}
d6c3b6e
8bc7032
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8bc7032"}
a6c0fbb
15c3923
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"15c3923"}
edb636e
783e17e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"783e17e"}
e4a3f32
ad2d9f4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ad2d9f4"}
7ffa264
468f6c5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "468f6c5" }
1b6cffd
5bf5bc6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "5bf5bc6" }
090ba43
417583d
ec1038d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ec1038d"}
73c0e63
6c9f2a5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "6c9f2a5" }
476436c
4e10997
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "4e10997" }
13fd5af
278a28d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "278a28d"
}
18a44ac
0cce5b2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "0cce5b2" }
b991c53
c11d645
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c11d645"}
983b121
11843d7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "11843d7"
}
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
81db2df4b50b165a27b74fc121564b734299b80e7419b75c6435e54f09ca521f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"81db2df4b50b165a27b74fc121564b734299b80e7419b75c6435e54f09ca521f"}
Failure: Expected target hash/prefix or subject 'change add operation'
Invalid JSON. Output: The bad commit is **ab05b50**, as it is the only commit where the test failed (FAIL).
Answer: ab05b50
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-c5d3281d-84e1-975b-8194-b1a1a0187bf5","request_id":"c5d3281d-84e1-975b-8194-b1a1a0187bf5"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-3f647a28-fdc5-9e59-85bc-42878f8de6a7","request_id":"3f647a28-fdc5-9e59-85bc-42878f8de6a7"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-b8ed1401-5bd4-93a8-9ba8-89379f7cddb5","request_id":"b8ed1401-5bd4-93a8-9ba8-89379f7cddb5"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-7f34b657-4274-9f55-9487-53f849df77c8","request_id":"7f34b657-4274-9f55-9487-53f849df77c8"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-d999d583-8dc1-9fa7-bb47-3fd7bbf4d318","request_id":"d999d583-8dc1-9fa7-bb47-3fd7bbf4d318"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-19ce821a-79d5-9097-807d-9a634e0002d1"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-804441b1-be88-9471-b1b8-841dfbf9ff3c"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-3a46b7bc-48f5-9c3e-977f-ba8f727d3185"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-33de4ed7-125a-9076-9fed-84ce5b9ae729"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-ba10109d-da30-9e56-962e-4a45daa0b67a"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-dfeec84a-7dd5-9d68-a1c8-0b44250f5bc6"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-33ad854e-d207-949f-9ad8-ba0dbb5f6d1e","request_id":"33ad854e-d207-949f-9ad8-ba0dbb5f6d1e"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-63d74951-9853-9684-85e5-211e66384ae1","request_id":"63d74951-9853-9684-85e5-211e66384ae1"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-916f898e-d5ac-955d-b94f-e5a72fe7ffd2","request_id":"916f898e-d5ac-955d-b94f-e5a72fe7ffd2"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-526d2674-0e42-91a2-8132-a8c73597411f","request_id":"526d2674-0e42-91a2-8132-a8c73597411f"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-91c4e6f0-f467-9900-b571-c338409bab95","request_id":"91c4e6f0-f467-9900-b571-c338409bab95"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-2f5e63e2-cbb1-97c7-8784-c9156e09515c","request_id":"2f5e63e2-cbb1-97c7-8784-c9156e09515c"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-29c375ee-4880-9d25-bf90-6cd8614261da","request_id":"29c375ee-4880-9d25-bf90-6cd8614261da"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-08c51b60-c66a-97de-a2da-a5957ab75987","request_id":"08c51b60-c66a-97de-a2da-a5957ab75987"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-cb3fadac-f38a-97d5-8d72-bbc5aa2a38e4","request_id":"cb3fadac-f38a-97d5-8d72-bbc5aa2a38e4"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-fcecc56b-6de8-9902-8898-89d95ee2a85b","request_id":"fcecc56b-6de8-9902-8898-89d95ee2a85b"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
Invalid JSON. Output: 0ae0b2c{ "commit": "0ae0b2c" }
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Invalid JSON. Output: 01ace51
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Invalid JSON. Output: b60bef9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: fe31969{"commit": "fe31969"}
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: 2f25dda
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)