Linear history with bad commit second from beginning - model identifies second commit
Tests ability to identify the second commit as bad. Evaluates bisect near the start of a linear history.

These commands set up the repo before the model sees the prompt. They define the starting file structure, staged changes, and Git history.

  1. 01 git init
  2. 02 git config user.email 'test@test.com'
  3. 03 git config user.name 'Test User'
  4. 04 echo '#!/bin/bash' > test.sh
  5. 05 echo '! grep -q "import.*pytest" tests/test_*.py 2>/dev/null' >> test.sh
  6. 06 chmod +x test.sh
  7. 07 git add test.sh
  8. 08 git commit -m 'Initial commit'
  9. 09 mkdir -p tests && echo 'import pytest' > tests/test_core.py
  10. 10 git add tests/test_core.py
  11. 11 git commit -m 'setup pytest'
  12. 12 echo 'def test_one(): pass' >> tests/test_core.py
  13. 13 git add tests/test_core.py
  14. 14 git commit -m 'add test_one'
  15. 15 echo 'def test_two(): pass' >> tests/test_core.py
  16. 16 git add tests/test_core.py
  17. 17 git commit -m 'add test_two'
Prompt
You are debugging a git repository. The following commit history has one bad commit that broke the build. Identify the bad commit hash (first 7 characters) or commit subject line that introduced the bug. Use the git log and test output to determine which commit is bad. Your answer should be the commit hash (e.g., 'abc1234') or the commit subject line.
Expected
setup pytest

Scoped model quality, cost, API time, and token usage for git_bisect/f005.

Loading...
Loading raw attempt evidence…
anthropic/claude-fable-5:high PASS 100% 272 in → 189 out (9 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `5362d84` — "setup pytest"** Reasoning: - `fcc7d48` (Initial commit): PASS ✅ - `5362d84` (setup pytest): FAIL ❌ ← first failing commit - All subsequent commits (`174e4bc`, `5b744be`) also fail, which is consistent with the break being inherited from `5362d84`. The transition from PASS to FAIL happens at **5362d84 "setup pytest"**, so that commit introduced the bug.
anthropic/claude-fable-5:high__json_schema PASS 100% 493 in → 13 out (0 reasoning)
455a775
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "455a775"}
anthropic/claude-fable-5:low PASS 100% 270 in → 48 out (0 reasoning)
The bad commit is **2750504** ("setup pytest") — it's the first commit where tests fail, and all subsequent commits continue to fail.
anthropic/claude-fable-5:low__json_schema PASS 100% 489 in → 14 out (0 reasoning)
57dca21
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "57dca21"}
anthropic/claude-fable-5:max PASS 100% 272 in → 474 out (65 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `c6ba786` — "setup pytest"** **Reasoning (bisect logic):** | Commit | Subject | Result | |--------|---------|--------| | 1166388 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | c6ba786 | setup pytest | ❌ FAIL ← first failure | | 597eb0d | add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | 12ec1fe | add test_two | ❌ FAIL | The build passed at `1166388` (Initial commit) and first failed at `c6ba786` (setup pytest). Since every commit after it also fails, the transition from PASS → FAIL happened exactly at **`c6ba786`**, making it the commit that introduced the bug. The subsequent commits (`597eb0d`, `12ec1fe`) merely inherited the broken state.
anthropic/claude-fable-5:max__json_schema PASS 100% 491 in → 119 out (61 reasoning)
9f90566
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "9f90566"}
anthropic/claude-fable-5:medium PASS 100% 274 in → 96 out (9 reasoning)
**ad5fb2e** — "setup pytest" This is the first commit where tests transitioned from PASS (4b212c4) to FAIL, and all subsequent commits remained failing, indicating ad5fb2e introduced the bug.
anthropic/claude-fable-5:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 501 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
0c7a6ac
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "0c7a6ac"}
anthropic/claude-fable-5:xhigh PASS 100% 268 in → 211 out (17 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `364c40a` — "setup pytest"** Reasoning: - `f14836e` (Initial commit) passes with exit code 0. - `364c40a` (setup pytest) is the **first commit that fails** (exit code 1). - All subsequent commits (`4b890d2`, `d475f35`) continue to fail, which is consistent with the bug being introduced at `364c40a` and never fixed. Since the build was working before `364c40a` and broke exactly at that commit, `364c40a` ("setup pytest") is the bad commit.
anthropic/claude-fable-5:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 501 in → 37 out (17 reasoning)
bfb1131
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "bfb1131"}
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:high PASS 100% 246 in → 374 out (169 reasoning)
# Analysis Looking at the test results in chronological order: - **67a0aaa (Initial commit)**: PASS ✓ - **8ad9502 (setup pytest)**: FAIL ✗ ← First failure - **50fea75 (add test_one)**: FAIL - **1bbf0b9 (add test_two)**: FAIL The build was passing at the initial commit but started failing at "setup pytest". All subsequent commits remain failing because they inherit the broken state from that commit. **Bad commit: `8ad9502` or `setup pytest`**
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:high__json_schema PASS 100% 416 in → 336 out (246 reasoning)
f0e84d5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "f0e84d5"}
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:low PASS 100% 244 in → 459 out (224 reasoning)
# Answer **c561c84** (or "setup pytest") ## Analysis Looking at the test results in chronological order: 1. **b931f16** (Initial commit): ✓ PASS 2. **c561c84** (setup pytest): ✗ FAIL ← First failure 3. **3b427c9** (add test_one): ✗ FAIL 4. **5487f7a** (add test_two): ✗ FAIL The build was passing at the initial commit, but fails starting with commit `c561c84` where pytest was set up. This is where the bug was introduced. Subsequent commits still fail, indicating the problem originated in this commit.
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:low__json_schema PASS 100% 418 in → 7,797 out (289 reasoning)
92c81c2
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "92c81c2"}
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:medium PASS 100% 242 in → 396 out (198 reasoning)
# Answer **17bad48** (or "setup pytest") ## Analysis Looking at the test results chronologically: - `6830a5f` (Initial commit): **PASS** ✓ - `17bad48` (setup pytest): **FAIL** ✗ — First failure - `b4ab5b1` (add test_one): FAIL - `949b15f` (add test_two): FAIL The bad commit is **17bad48 setup pytest** because it's the first commit where the tests transitioned from passing to failing. This is where the bug was introduced.
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 412 in → 461 out (347 reasoning)
33f1bd2
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "33f1bd2"}
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:none PASS 100% 209 in → 138 out (0 reasoning)
# Analysis Looking at the test results chronologically: - **5a24a3b (Initial commit)**: PASS ✓ - **257695b (setup pytest)**: FAIL ✗ - **87b7a6c (add test_one)**: FAIL ✗ - **399487f (add test_two)**: FAIL ✗ The build was passing at the initial commit and started failing at the next commit. **Answer: 257695b** (or "setup pytest") This is the first commit where the tests began failing, indicating it introduced the bug.
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:none__json_schema PASS 100% 386 in → 14 out (0 reasoning)
86d0d3c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "86d0d3c"}
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:xhigh PASS 100% 246 in → 424 out (204 reasoning)
# Analysis Looking at the test results chronologically: 1. **288c1e8 (Initial commit)**: PASS ✓ 2. **14cfce6 (setup pytest)**: FAIL ✗ ← First failure 3. **80019c6 (add test_one)**: FAIL ✗ 4. **f2fbd73 (add test_two)**: FAIL ✗ The build was passing at the initial commit, then failed starting with the "setup pytest" commit. Since 14cfce6 is the first commit where tests fail, this is the bad commit. **Answer: 14cfce6** (or "setup pytest")
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 412 in → 275 out (215 reasoning)
b998770
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "b998770"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:high PASS 100% 217 in → 10 out (0 reasoning)
`1b918c6`
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:high__json_schema PASS 100% 381 in → 10 out (0 reasoning)
5302194
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5302194"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:low PASS 100% 217 in → 11 out (0 reasoning)
4a6f7f1
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:low__json_schema PASS 100% 375 in → 11 out (0 reasoning)
a62beda
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a62beda"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:max PASS 100% 213 in → 335 out (103 reasoning)
## Bad Commit Identified **`08dbbbf`** — *setup pytest* ### Reasoning Tracing the test results from oldest to newest: | Commit | Subject | Result | |--------|---------|--------| | ff31eb5 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | **08dbbbf** | **setup pytest** | **❌ FAIL** | | 8e6f37a | add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | 2221f52 | add test_two | ❌ FAIL | The build was passing at `ff31eb5` and first broke at `08dbbbf`. Every subsequent commit continues to fail because it inherits the bug introduced in `08dbbbf`. This is the commit that introduced the regression.
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:max__json_schema PASS 100% 387 in → 80 out (49 reasoning)
a7a2441
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a7a2441"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:medium PASS 100% 215 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
`37f1153`
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 379 in → 11 out (0 reasoning)
e289ced
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e289ced"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:none PASS 100% 215 in → 31 out (0 reasoning)
The bad commit is **9a2ef02** (`setup pytest`), as it is the first commit where the tests start failing.
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:none__json_schema PASS 100% 381 in → 11 out (0 reasoning)
8b318cd
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8b318cd"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:xhigh PASS 100% 217 in → 31 out (0 reasoning)
The bad commit is **e5618a2** (`setup pytest`), as it is the first commit where the tests began failing.
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 381 in → 11 out (0 reasoning)
14ad4ae
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"14ad4ae"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:high PASS 100% 275 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
d27d862
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:high__json_schema PASS 100% 494 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
7ac562b
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7ac562b"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:low PASS 100% 277 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
697ee73
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:low__json_schema PASS 100% 498 in → 18 out (0 reasoning)
deaaeb5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"deaaeb5"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:max PASS 100% 283 in → 349 out (52 reasoning)
Looking at the test results chronologically: - `cd81ab1` Initial commit: **PASS** - `7c835fc` setup pytest: **FAIL** ← First failure - `4a1e64b` add test_one: FAIL (inherited) - `b0bf394` add test_two: FAIL (inherited) The build was passing at the initial commit and broke starting at `7c835fc`. All subsequent commits inherit this failure. **Bad commit: `7c835fc` (setup pytest)**
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:max__json_schema PASS 100% 504 in → 20 out (0 reasoning)
f3aa1f0
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f3aa1f0"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:medium PASS 100% 279 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
6635c16
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 498 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
f0b074d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f0b074d"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:none PASS 100% 277 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
110a212
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:none__json_schema PASS 100% 504 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
3525ec7
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"3525ec7"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:xhigh PASS 100% 277 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
f5d5663
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 496 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
490fd4e
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"490fd4e"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:high PASS 100% 278 in → 154 out (17 reasoning)
**a82e235** ("setup pytest") This is the first commit where the build/tests started failing. The initial commit passed (exit code 0), but immediately after the "setup pytest" commit, the tests began failing (exit code 1) and remained broken in all subsequent commits. This pattern—a clean transition from PASS to FAIL at `a82e235`—identifies it as the commit that introduced the bug.
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:high__json_schema PASS 100% 495 in → 14 out (0 reasoning)
7d56698
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "7d56698"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:low PASS 100% 274 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
d1841e8
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:low__json_schema PASS 100% 489 in → 13 out (0 reasoning)
860f152
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "860f152"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:max PASS 100% 276 in → 758 out (85 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `e6ebdc6` — "setup pytest"** ## Reasoning Tracing the test results in chronological order (oldest → newest): | Commit | Subject | Result | |--------|---------|--------| | `054d2fc` | Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | `e6ebdc6` | setup pytest | ❌ FAIL ← **first failure** | | `e802f40` | add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | `b8731dd` | add test_two | ❌ FAIL | The build transitions from **PASS → FAIL** at commit `e6ebdc6`. Since: - The parent commit (`054d2fc`) passes cleanly, and - `e6ebdc6` is the **first** commit where the failure appears (and it remains broken thereafter), commit **`e6ebdc6` ("setup pytest")** is the one that introduced the bug. The later failures in `e802f40` and `b8731dd` are just inherited from this broken state — they aren't the root cause. **Likely culprit:** A misconfiguration introduced while setting up pytest (e.g., a broken `pytest.ini`/`pyproject.toml`/`conftest.py`, a missing dependency, or an import/collection error) rather than an actual test assertion failure.
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:max__json_schema PASS 100% 495 in → 84 out (32 reasoning)
1423212
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "1423212"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:medium PASS 100% 270 in → 138 out (17 reasoning)
**48cd67e** (`setup pytest`) This is the bad commit. The test results show that `c187d66` (Initial commit) passed, but the very next commit `48cd67e setup pytest` failed—and all subsequent commits remained broken. Since the failure was introduced at `48cd67e` and persisted, that commit is the one that broke the build.
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 489 in → 15 out (0 reasoning)
8d9274d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8d9274d"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:none PASS 100% 266 in → 176 out (0 reasoning)
The first commit where the build/tests started failing is **39bb91b** ("setup pytest"). **Reasoning:** - `010265c` (Initial commit): PASS - `39bb91b` (setup pytest): FAIL ← first failure - `48091d7` (add test_one): FAIL - `05c5036` (add test_two): FAIL Since `010265c` passes and `39bb91b` is the first commit to fail (and all subsequent commits inherit the failure), the bug was introduced in **39bb91b**.
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:none__json_schema PASS 100% 485 in → 13 out (0 reasoning)
6645e80
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "6645e80"}
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:xhigh PASS 100% 272 in → 470 out (43 reasoning)
# Analysis Looking at the test results across commits (oldest first): | Commit | Subject | Result | |--------|---------|--------| | 5b1be2f | Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | 53ff081 | setup pytest | ❌ FAIL | | 3950d6a | add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | 4d183ff | add test_two | ❌ FAIL | # Conclusion The transition from **PASS → FAIL** happens at commit **`53ff081`** ("setup pytest"). This is the first commit where the build broke, and all subsequent commits inherited the failure. The later commits (`3950d6a` and `4d183ff`) also fail, but only because they build on top of the already-broken `53ff081` — they aren't the origin of the bug. **Bad commit: `53ff081` (setup pytest)** This makes sense intuitively: the pytest setup itself was likely misconfigured (e.g., broken `conftest.py`, bad `pytest.ini`/`pyproject.toml` config, or a missing dependency), which caused the test runner to fail even before any real tests were added.
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 489 in → 14 out (0 reasoning)
ce12969
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ce12969"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:high PASS 100% 209 in → 308 out (51 reasoning)
## Analysis Looking at the test results chronologically: | Commit | Description | Result | |--------|-------------|--------| | `6ea9326` | Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | `4cb418d` | setup pytest | ❌ FAIL | | `d91ba02` | add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | `e942edf` | add test_two | ❌ FAIL | The build was passing at `6ea9326` and **first broke** at `4cb418d`. All subsequent commits continued to fail, which is consistent with the bug being introduced at `4cb418d` and never fixed. ## Bad Commit **`4cb418d`** The "setup pytest" commit introduced the bug — likely a misconfigured `pytest` setup (e.g., broken `pytest.ini`, `setup.cfg`, `conftest.py`, or `pyproject.toml`) that caused the test suite to fail from that point forward.
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:high__json_schema PASS 100% 385 in → 11 out (0 reasoning)
01ceee9
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"01ceee9"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:low PASS 100% 215 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
`5359be4`
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:low__json_schema PASS 100% 377 in → 10 out (0 reasoning)
2483919
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2483919"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:max PASS 100% 211 in → 292 out (71 reasoning)
## Analysis Looking at the test results chronologically: | Commit | Subject | Result | |--------|---------|--------| | `4f2ddfa` | Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | `3f61484` | setup pytest | ❌ FAIL | | `4cfccfb` | add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | `ec72700` | add test_two | ❌ FAIL | The build passed on `4f2ddfa` and **first broke** at `3f61484`. All subsequent commits also fail, meaning the bug was never fixed — it originated in the "setup pytest" commit. ## Answer **`3f61484`** This is the bad commit ("setup pytest") — it introduced the build failure that persisted through all later commits.
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:max__json_schema PASS 100% 377 in → 121 out (81 reasoning)
2505494
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2505494"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:medium PASS 100% 219 in → 14 out (0 reasoning)
The bad commit is **f7dfc21**
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 381 in → 10 out (0 reasoning)
0427384
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"0427384"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:none PASS 100% 215 in → 66 out (0 reasoning)
The bad commit is **a4bfa64** This is the commit that introduced the failure — it changed the exit code from 0 (PASS) to 1 (FAIL), and all subsequent commits continued to fail. The "setup pytest" commit is where the bug was introduced.
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:none__json_schema PASS 100% 383 in → 11 out (0 reasoning)
73777c3
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"73777c3"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:xhigh PASS 100% 211 in → 308 out (63 reasoning)
## Analysis Looking at the test results ordered from oldest to newest: | Commit | Subject | Result | |--------|---------|--------| | `e043d8a` | Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | `0a84381` | setup pytest | ❌ FAIL | | `02b001d` | add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | `a2ef04f` | add test_two | ❌ FAIL | The build went from **PASS → FAIL** at commit `0a84381`. All subsequent commits also fail, which is consistent with the bug being introduced at this point and never fixed. ## Bad Commit **`0a84381`** — *setup pytest* This commit introduced the bug. The pytest setup (likely `pytest.ini`, `setup.cfg`, `conftest.py`, or `setup.py`/`pyproject.toml`) was misconfigured, causing the test suite to fail from that point forward.
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 387 in → 10 out (0 reasoning)
2403844
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2403844"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:high PASS 100% 270 in → 220 out (40 reasoning)
**fe8929c** (setup pytest) This is the first commit where the test suite transitions from PASS to FAIL. Since all subsequent commits (6ed0b5f, 6683104) continue to fail, the regression was introduced in `fe8929c`, not in the later commits — they simply inherit the broken state. The "setup pytest" commit likely misconfigured the test environment (e.g., bad pytest config, broken dependency, or incorrect test discovery setup), causing the build/test run to fail from that point forward.
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:high__json_schema PASS 100% 485 in → 14 out (0 reasoning)
38456b2
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"38456b2"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:low PASS 100% 274 in → 12 out (0 reasoning)
b480c92 setup pytest
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:low__json_schema PASS 100% 493 in → 14 out (0 reasoning)
83a0448
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"83a0448"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:medium PASS 100% 268 in → 101 out (0 reasoning)
**d037155 - "setup pytest"** This is the first commit where tests fail (exit code 1), and this failure persists through all subsequent commits. Since the previous commit (b19461e) passed, and this commit introduced the failure that carried forward, "setup pytest" is the bad commit that broke the build.
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 499 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
e5c1bcf
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e5c1bcf"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:none PASS 100% 276 in → 63 out (0 reasoning)
Based on the test results, the build first failed at commit `02f82c1` (setup pytest), and remained failing afterward. **Bad commit: 02f82c1 (setup pytest)**
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:none__json_schema PASS 100% 497 in → 14 out (0 reasoning)
1bb7983
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1bb7983"}
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:xhigh PASS 100% 280 in → 104 out (0 reasoning)
**8ae2368** (setup pytest) This is the first commit where the tests fail (exit code 1), while the prior commit (Initial commit) passed. Since all subsequent commits also fail, the regression was introduced here rather than in the later test-adding commits, which simply inherit the broken state from "setup pytest."
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 497 in → 22 out (0 reasoning)
fa5c1bc setup pytest
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"fa5c1bc setup pytest"}
arcee-ai/trinity-large-thinking:high PASS 100% 192 in → 751 out (719 reasoning)
The first commit that caused a test failure is `cbd1ff4` with the subject line "setup pytest". Therefore, the bad commit is `cbd1ff4`.
arcee-ai/trinity-large-thinking:low PASS 100% 186 in → 447 out (424 reasoning)
The first commit that caused a test failure is `9365847` (subject line: "setup pytest").
arcee-ai/trinity-large-thinking:medium PASS 100% 192 in → 1,353 out (1,311 reasoning)
The first commit that caused a test failure is `fead60a` (setup pytest). All subsequent commits also fail, indicating the bug was introduced in this commit. **Answer:** fead60a
arcee-ai/trinity-large-thinking:xhigh PASS 100% 194 in → 1,648 out (1,591 reasoning)
The first commit that causes a test failure is `55680ad` (setup pytest), as indicated by the test results showing a PASS for the initial commit and a FAIL for the next commit. This means the bug was introduced in commit `55680ad`. **Answer:** 55680ad
arcee-ai/trinity-mini:high PASS 100% 198 in → 697 out (685 reasoning)
d3b9e43
arcee-ai/trinity-mini:high__json_schema PASS 100% 190 in → 684 out (773 reasoning)
8227dfe
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "8227dfe" }
arcee-ai/trinity-mini:low PASS 100% 192 in → 649 out (664 reasoning)
a94915e
arcee-ai/trinity-mini:low__json_schema PASS 100% 188 in → 526 out (578 reasoning)
5818e23
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "5818e23" }
arcee-ai/trinity-mini:medium PASS 100% 194 in → 803 out (623 reasoning)
ab9bc1c**Reasoning:** 1. **Test Results Order:** The test results are listed oldest first (921b050, ab9bc1c, 6e52e0a, 30495d5). 2. **Initial Commit PASS:** The very first commit (921b050) passed, meaning the build was working at that point. 3. **First Failure:** The next commit (ab9bc1c) failed. This is the first commit where the build broke. 4. **Subsequent Failures:** All commits after ab9bc1c (6e52e0a and 30495d5) also failed. This indicates the bug was introduced in ab9bc1c and persisted in later commits. 5. **Only One Bad Commit:** The problem states there is only one bad commit. Since ab9bc1c is the first commit to fail and the others fail because of it, it is the commit that introduced the bug. Therefore, the bad commit is `ab9bc1c` (or its subject line "setup pytest").
arcee-ai/trinity-mini:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 190 in → 234 out (238 reasoning)
09d7318
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "09d7318" }
arcee-ai/trinity-mini:xhigh PASS 100% 196 in → 720 out (570 reasoning)
0e9b09c **Explanation:** The test results show that the initial commit (`b24deeb`) passed, but the commit `0e9b09c` (subject: "setup pytest") caused the build to fail (exit code 1). All subsequent commits (`9245100` and `c2e84b2`) also failed, indicating that the bug was introduced in `0e9b09c`. This commit is the first one that caused a failure, making it the bad commit.
arcee-ai/trinity-mini:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 192 in → 532 out (546 reasoning)
43f0313
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "43f0313" }
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:high PASS 100% 183 in → 224 out (218 reasoning)
ff3b292
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:high__json_schema PASS 100% 185 in → 102 out (115 reasoning)
a687fab
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a687fab"}
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:low PASS 100% 266 in → 262 out (256 reasoning)
3ac9e77
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:low__json_schema PASS 100% 189 in → 278 out (259 reasoning)
2a842c6
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "2a842c6" }
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:max PASS 100% 266 in → 110 out (103 reasoning)
65904c0
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:max__json_schema PASS 100% 465 in → 190 out (180 reasoning)
fe41b79
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"fe41b79"}
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:medium PASS 100% 187 in → 508 out (503 reasoning)
18e5060
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 331 in → 88 out (92 reasoning)
02014ee
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "02014ee"}
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:none PASS 100% 189 in → 83 out (0 reasoning)
The bad commit is **a46fae0** (setup pytest). This is the commit that first introduced the failure - it's the first commit where the test exit code changed from 0 (PASS) to 1 (FAIL), and all subsequent commits continue to fail. The earlier commit 5ac6a75 passed, but after a46fae0 was added, the build broke.
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:none__json_schema PASS 100% 189 in → 13 out (0 reasoning)
02f0497
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "02f0497" }
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:xhigh PASS 100% 268 in → 94 out (89 reasoning)
2b24622
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 187 in → 174 out (175 reasoning)
1b4fb63
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "1b4fb63" }
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:high PASS 100% 187 in → 102 out (96 reasoning)
355ee8b
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:high__json_schema PASS 100% 193 in → 158 out (143 reasoning)
d3d823f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "d3d823f" }
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:low PASS 100% 189 in → 131 out (127 reasoning)
40e67bb
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:medium PASS 100% 183 in → 117 out (114 reasoning)
bbb9201
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:none PASS 100% 185 in → 68 out (0 reasoning)
Based on the test results, the build was passing at commit `bc95dff` (Initial commit) and then failed for the first time at commit `d216d52` (setup pytest). Since this is the first commit where the test fails, that's the one that introduced the bug. **d216d52**
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:none__json_schema PASS 100% 183 in → 12 out (0 reasoning)
26ccc2c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "26ccc2c" }
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:xhigh PASS 100% 270 in → 177 out (172 reasoning)
810b466
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 264 in → 155 out (146 reasoning)
2293b67
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "2293b67" }
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:high PASS 100% 189 in → 242 out (214 reasoning)
0912337
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:high__json_schema PASS 100% 374 in → 500 out (490 reasoning)
f567807
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "f567807"}
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:low PASS 100% 187 in → 245 out (227 reasoning)
ad35a88
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:low__json_schema PASS 100% 193 in → 12 out (0 reasoning)
e2fe4d0
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "e2fe4d0"}
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:medium PASS 100% 189 in → 281 out (273 reasoning)
f94da0d
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 390 in → 92 out (81 reasoning)
7b16789
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "7b16789"}
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:none PASS 100% 193 in → 147 out (0 reasoning)
Based on the test results, the first bad commit is **b4f6cc6** (setup pytest). The commit history shows: - **b188a49** Initial commit: **PASS** - **b4f6cc6** setup pytest: **FAIL** ← first failure - **7326c9b** add test_one: FAIL - **0d43e15** add test_two: FAIL Since the initial commit passes and the very next commit (`b4f6cc6` - "setup pytest") fails, that is the commit that introduced the bug. All subsequent commits continue to fail, which is consistent with the bug being introduced in `b4f6cc6`.
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:none__json_schema PASS 100% 384 in → 10 out (0 reasoning)
6ae3031
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "6ae3031"}
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:xhigh PASS 100% 272 in → 397 out (389 reasoning)
ba8c1a2
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 183 in → 10 out (0 reasoning)
4dc8824
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4dc8824"}
google/gemini-3-flash-preview:high PASS 100% 213 in → 162 out (156 reasoning)
7e491fc
google/gemini-3-flash-preview:high__json_schema PASS 100% 214 in → 237 out (227 reasoning)
16e32ae
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"16e32ae"}
google/gemini-3-flash-preview:low PASS 100% 209 in → 308 out (291 reasoning)
The bad commit is **2a04983** (setup pytest).
google/gemini-3-flash-preview:low__json_schema PASS 100% 278 in → 243 out (232 reasoning)
660126b
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"660126b"}
google/gemini-3-flash-preview:medium PASS 100% 213 in → 336 out (231 reasoning)
The commit that introduced the bug is **526ffc4** (or "setup pytest"). According to the test results: - 0be37f4 (Initial commit): **PASS** - 526ffc4 (setup pytest): **FAIL** (This is where the failure first occurs) - ed0f1d8 (add test_one): **FAIL** - 1b1c181 (add test_two): **FAIL**
google/gemini-3-flash-preview:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 268 in → 456 out (445 reasoning)
d1cb654
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d1cb654"}
google/gemini-3-flash-preview:xhigh PASS 100% 213 in → 205 out (185 reasoning)
The commit that broke the build is **25c31b0** (setup pytest).
google/gemini-3-flash-preview:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 272 in → 318 out (307 reasoning)
ef25349
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ef25349"}
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview:high PASS 100% 210 in → 614 out (522 reasoning)
The bad commit is **dde2252** (subject: **setup pytest**). **Reasoning:** The test results show that `9b3e1fa` passed, but the very next commit, `dde2252`, failed. All subsequent commits (`600299e` and `4abb355`) continued to fail, indicating the regression was introduced by `dde2252`.
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview:high__json_schema PASS 100% 216 in → 316 out (300 reasoning)
21a4694
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "21a4694" }
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview:low PASS 100% 215 in → 237 out (139 reasoning)
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **7e0cc80** (subject: **setup pytest**). **Reasoning:** The test results show that `6a69f08` (the oldest commit) passed, but the very next commit in the history, `7e0cc80`, resulted in a fail. Since the build broke at that specific point, `7e0cc80` is the commit that introduced the error.
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview:low__json_schema PASS 100% 212 in → 147 out (131 reasoning)
805fe79
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "805fe79" }
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview:medium PASS 100% 208 in → 280 out (265 reasoning)
The bad commit is **8a9ffef** (setup pytest).
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 268 in → 175 out (161 reasoning)
62bbeec
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "62bbeec" }
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview:xhigh PASS 100% 216 in → 584 out (503 reasoning)
The bad commit is **73e2285** (setup pytest). **Reasoning:** The test results show that the state of the repository changed from PASS to FAIL at commit `73e2285`. Since the previous commit (`71d54ef`) passed, `73e2285` is the commit that introduced the breaking change.
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 214 in → 383 out (372 reasoning)
af15377
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "af15377"}
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:high PASS 100% 211 in → 141 out (134 reasoning)
a350a05
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:high__json_schema PASS 100% 272 in → 136 out (127 reasoning)
4fbecc4
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"4fbecc4"}
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:low PASS 100% 213 in → 198 out (180 reasoning)
The bad commit is **941cb6f** (or "setup pytest").
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:low__json_schema PASS 100% 276 in → 152 out (141 reasoning)
0ad7a0d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "0ad7a0d"}
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:medium PASS 100% 215 in → 299 out (292 reasoning)
0f0c82a
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 274 in → 109 out (97 reasoning)
54c5036
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "54c5036"}
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:xhigh PASS 100% 215 in → 244 out (237 reasoning)
0d43839
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 274 in → 250 out (238 reasoning)
5f06993
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "5f06993"}
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:high PASS 100% 218 in → 350 out (343 reasoning)
241c84b
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:high__json_schema PASS 100% 272 in → 553 out (543 reasoning)
cfb24a5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"cfb24a5"}
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:low PASS 100% 212 in → 104 out (98 reasoning)
699cfb2
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:low__json_schema PASS 100% 214 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
74c993b
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "74c993b" }
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:max PASS 100% 214 in → 459 out (453 reasoning)
cf94f14
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:max__json_schema PASS 100% 278 in → 504 out (492 reasoning)
2b40d81
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "2b40d81"}
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:medium PASS 100% 210 in → 232 out (228 reasoning)
ced5fa3
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 214 in → 230 out (213 reasoning)
a75668b
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "a75668b" }
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:xhigh PASS 100% 212 in → 392 out (385 reasoning)
1172850
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 214 in → 497 out (485 reasoning)
4514195
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4514195"}
google/gemini-3.5-flash:high PASS 100% 215 in → 217 out (210 reasoning)
b78250c
google/gemini-3.5-flash:high__json_schema PASS 100% 278 in → 396 out (385 reasoning)
b42b9f5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b42b9f5"}
google/gemini-3.5-flash:low PASS 100% 211 in → 162 out (118 reasoning)
Based on the test results, the commit that introduced the bug is **899fe2a** (or the commit subject line "setup pytest"), as it is the first commit where the tests began to fail.
google/gemini-3.5-flash:low__json_schema PASS 100% 276 in → 80 out (69 reasoning)
45a6dbe
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "45a6dbe"}
google/gemini-3.5-flash:medium PASS 100% 217 in → 359 out (352 reasoning)
59e6330
google/gemini-3.5-flash:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 276 in → 185 out (175 reasoning)
7b43eee
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "7b43eee"}
google/gemini-3.5-flash:xhigh PASS 100% 213 in → 170 out (165 reasoning)
ed2ad2e
google/gemini-3.5-flash:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 280 in → 344 out (332 reasoning)
081c409
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "081c409"}
google/gemini-3.6-flash:high PASS 100% 214 in → 214 out (208 reasoning)
63d93db
google/gemini-3.6-flash:high__json_schema PASS 100% 216 in → 330 out (319 reasoning)
8161049
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8161049"}
google/gemini-3.6-flash:low PASS 100% 212 in → 145 out (119 reasoning)
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **c0c09e5** (or subject line: `setup pytest`).
google/gemini-3.6-flash:low__json_schema PASS 100% 214 in → 69 out (58 reasoning)
01e0e51
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"01e0e51"}
google/gemini-3.6-flash:max PASS 100% 207 in → 263 out (243 reasoning)
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **d50f4ee** (setup pytest).
google/gemini-3.6-flash:max__json_schema PASS 100% 278 in → 462 out (451 reasoning)
d390a2f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d390a2f"}
google/gemini-3.6-flash:medium PASS 100% 208 in → 242 out (228 reasoning)
`99bd6f8` (or "setup pytest")
google/gemini-3.6-flash:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 280 in → 354 out (343 reasoning)
5d34a4f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5d34a4f"}
google/gemini-3.6-flash:xhigh PASS 100% 207 in → 369 out (350 reasoning)
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **bc64aa6** (`setup pytest`).
google/gemini-3.6-flash:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 212 in → 353 out (342 reasoning)
7f42093
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7f42093"}
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:high PASS 100% 229 in → 333 out (225 reasoning)
e66b054
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:high__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 291 out (181 reasoning)
d28cfba
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "d28cfba" }
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:low PASS 100% 228 in → 371 out (242 reasoning)
de1e1f1
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:low__json_schema PASS 100% 232 in → 294 out (167 reasoning)
4891617
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "4891617" }
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:medium PASS 100% 224 in → 232 out (160 reasoning)
9c36bea
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 231 in → 280 out (163 reasoning)
d7ac958
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d7ac958"}
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:none PASS 100% 224 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
a2ab52c
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:none__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
313403f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "313403f" }
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:xhigh PASS 100% 225 in → 330 out (220 reasoning)
490d2df
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 223 in → 465 out (300 reasoning)
9ba4f0e
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9ba4f0e" }
google/gemma-4-31b-it:high PASS 100% 231 in → 171 out (109 reasoning)
366d952
google/gemma-4-31b-it:high__json_schema PASS 100% 232 in → 267 out (178 reasoning)
a8c648f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "a8c648f"}
google/gemma-4-31b-it:low PASS 100% 229 in → 217 out (151 reasoning)
ec84ba7
google/gemma-4-31b-it:low__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 196 out (121 reasoning)
25c206d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "25c206d" }
google/gemma-4-31b-it:medium PASS 100% 226 in → 239 out (162 reasoning)
4e38ed4
google/gemma-4-31b-it:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 228 in → 169 out (100 reasoning)
4082368
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4082368"}
google/gemma-4-31b-it:none PASS 100% 230 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
10c0a8f
google/gemma-4-31b-it:none__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 12 out (0 reasoning)
23e82ed
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "23e82ed"}
google/gemma-4-31b-it:xhigh PASS 100% 226 in → 167 out (119 reasoning)
ee4ae66
ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b PASS 100% 206 in → 109 out
The bad commit is the one that introduced the failure in the test results. Looking at the test results: - `7093e87 Initial commit` → PASS - `c5373bb setup pytest` → FAIL - `81047f2 add test_one` → FAIL - `cfe9baf add test_two` → FAIL The first failure appears after the commit `c5373bb setup pytest`. Therefore, the bad commit hash (first 7 characters) is: **c5373bb**.
ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b__json_schema PASS 100% 206 in → 11 out
259718d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "259718d" }
inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash PASS 100% 233 in → 7 out
543fb7a
inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash__json_schema PASS 100% 231 in → 13 out
534735d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "534735d"}
minimax/minimax-m2.5:high PASS 100% 217 in → 213 out (227 reasoning)
fa70697
minimax/minimax-m2.5:high__json_schema PASS 100% 225 in → 382 out (370 reasoning)
7827e62
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "7827e62" }
minimax/minimax-m2.5:low PASS 100% 243 in → 451 out (445 reasoning)
03036c2
minimax/minimax-m2.5:low__json_schema PASS 100% 225 in → 355 out (343 reasoning)
63663d9
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "63663d9" }
minimax/minimax-m2.5:medium PASS 100% 229 in → 268 out (262 reasoning)
74d1ee6
minimax/minimax-m2.5:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 221 in → 288 out (266 reasoning)
b255117
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "b255117" }
minimax/minimax-m2.5:xhigh PASS 100% 219 in → 453 out (505 reasoning)
23dd8cf
minimax/minimax-m2.5:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 233 in → 378 out (390 reasoning)
27577e6
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "27577e6" }
minimax/minimax-m2.7:high PASS 100% 224 in → 467 out (462 reasoning)
c919dfc
minimax/minimax-m2.7:high__json_schema PASS 100% 360 in → 569 out (554 reasoning)
edb67c1
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "edb67c1" }
minimax/minimax-m2.7:low PASS 100% 225 in → 236 out (235 reasoning)
7b54a38
minimax/minimax-m2.7:low__json_schema PASS 100% 358 in → 429 out (418 reasoning)
ef0dc1c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ef0dc1c"}
minimax/minimax-m2.7:medium PASS 100% 225 in → 438 out (424 reasoning)
574f79f (the “setup pytest” commit)
minimax/minimax-m2.7:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 358 in → 543 out (529 reasoning)
4287daf
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "4287daf" }
minimax/minimax-m2.7:xhigh PASS 100% 223 in → 593 out (586 reasoning)
a4f2917
minimax/minimax-m2.7:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 360 in → 267 out (257 reasoning)
200ed41
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "200ed41"}
minimax/minimax-m3:high PASS 100% 355 in → 93 out (89 reasoning)
634cb13
minimax/minimax-m3:high__json_schema PASS 100% 305 in → 8 out (7 reasoning)
824313f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"824313f"}
minimax/minimax-m3:low PASS 100% 359 in → 160 out (105 reasoning)
The bad commit is **a04957c** ("setup pytest"). This is the first commit where the test status changed from PASS to FAIL. TheInitial commit passed, but immediately after "setup pytest" was added, the build broke — and all subsequent commits inherited the failure.
minimax/minimax-m3:low__json_schema PASS 100% 338 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
652a480
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "652a480"}
minimax/minimax-m3:medium PASS 100% 359 in → 260 out (186 reasoning)
The bad commit is **f1ba4fe** (setup pytest). The initial commit (999dff0) passes, but after applying the "setup pytest" commit (f1ba4fe), the tests start failing and continue to fail in subsequent commits. This indicates that the "setup pytest" commit introduced the bug/regression.
minimax/minimax-m3:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 344 in → 12 out (0 reasoning)
9d04120
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9d04120" }
minimax/minimax-m3:xhigh PASS 100% 351 in → 118 out (109 reasoning)
fd1796c
minimax/minimax-m3:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 342 in → 12 out (0 reasoning)
cfc3bbc
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "cfc3bbc" }
mistralai/devstral-2512 PASS 100% 211 in → 92 out
Based on the test results, the build was working fine at commit `5b600ed` (Initial commit) but started failing at commit `99551b1` (setup pytest). Since all subsequent commits (`a891a63` and `475fa01`) also show failures, the bad commit that introduced the bug is: **99551b1** (setup pytest)
mistralai/devstral-2512__json_schema PASS 100% 207 in → 11 out
fa3ea58
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "fa3ea58"}
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:high PASS 100% 217 in → 524 out (436 reasoning)
058fb68
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:high__json_schema PASS 100% 211 in → 338 out (263 reasoning)
9e70a9d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "9e70a9d"}
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:low PASS 100% 223 in → 375 out (248 reasoning)
The first bad commit is where the tests changed from PASS to FAIL. The oldest commit (81596c0) passes, but 5dc9c0f fails. Since all commits after 5dc9c0f also fail, the bug was introduced in: 5dc9c0f
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:low__json_schema PASS 100% 207 in → 358 out (275 reasoning)
3b6f7cf
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "3b6f7cf"}
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:medium PASS 100% 223 in → 473 out (329 reasoning)
The bad commit is the first one that failed after a passing commit. Since `ab233c0` (Initial commit) passes and the next commit `72a9f4f` (setup pytest) fails, this is the commit that introduced the bug. 72a9f4f
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 207 in → 275 out (212 reasoning)
e207179
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "e207179"}
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:none PASS 100% 221 in → 64 out (0 reasoning)
The test results show that the build first failed at commit `482c06b setup pytest` (exit code 1). Since the previous commit (`26e5b13 Initial commit`) passed, the bad commit that introduced the bug is: **482c06b**
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:none__json_schema PASS 100% 211 in → 13 out (0 reasoning)
652a480
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "652a480"}
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:xhigh PASS 100% 223 in → 945 out (790 reasoning)
The build was passing at the initial commit and first fails at commit 8648d43. Since all subsequent commits also fail, the first bad commit that introduced the bug is **8648d43**. 8648d43
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 213 in → 315 out (229 reasoning)
9b2a5a3
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "9b2a5a3"}
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6:high PASS 100% 193 in → 441 out (436 reasoning)
161e357
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6:high__json_schema PASS 100% 191 in → 497 out (482 reasoning)
8b5c458
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "8b5c458" }
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6:low PASS 100% 189 in → 487 out (481 reasoning)
3108e14
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6:low__json_schema PASS 100% 192 in → 704 out (431 reasoning)
7264b25
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "7264b25" }
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6:medium PASS 100% 195 in → 372 out (361 reasoning)
**92779f4** (setup pytest)
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 194 in → 528 out (342 reasoning)
eb5f931
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "eb5f931" }
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6:xhigh PASS 100% 189 in → 560 out (554 reasoning)
9e518a0
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code:high PASS 100% 193 in → 178 out (170 reasoning)
0ed8a9a
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code:high__json_schema PASS 100% 280 in → 188 out (178 reasoning)
83dbeaa
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "83dbeaa"}
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code:low PASS 100% 201 in → 229 out (217 reasoning)
f3e2a56 (setup pytest)
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code:low__json_schema PASS 100% 189 in → 200 out (187 reasoning)
47b7716
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "47b7716" }
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code:medium PASS 100% 187 in → 146 out (140 reasoning)
1327eb1
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 195 in → 247 out (236 reasoning)
25ecd91
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "25ecd91"}
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code:xhigh PASS 100% 189 in → 219 out (214 reasoning)
031c2b0 — *setup pytest*
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 282 in → 176 out (165 reasoning)
0fd7c74
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"0fd7c74"}
moonshotai/kimi-k3:high PASS 100% 266 in → 197 out (111 reasoning)
The bad commit is **ee7300e** ("setup pytest"). The initial commit `ff6801d` passes (exit code 0), and the very next commit `ee7300e` is the first to fail (exit code 1). All later commits also fail, so the bug was introduced by `ee7300e`.
moonshotai/kimi-k3:high__json_schema PASS 100% 270 in → 331 out (122 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `e50134b` — "setup pytest"** **Reasoning:** - `4f4e03d` (Initial commit): **PASS** ✅ — build was working - `e50134b` (setup pytest): **FAIL** ❌ — first failure appears here - All subsequent commits also fail, which is expected once the bug is introduced Since the build transitioned from PASS to FAIL at `e50134b`, that is the first bad commit. Bisecting confirms it: everything at or before `4f4e03d` is good, and everything from `e50134b` onward is bad. A likely cause: the "setup pytest" commit added a pytest configuration (e.g., `pytest.ini`, `conftest.py`, or `setup.py`) with a misconfiguration, missing dependency, or broken import that causes pytest to exit with code 1 before any tests even run.
moonshotai/kimi-k3:low PASS 100% 266 in → 312 out (103 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `da6c07c` ("setup pytest")** **Reasoning:** Using a bisect-style analysis of the test results: - `3c956c9` (Initial commit) → **PASS** ✅ - `da6c07c` (setup pytest) → **FAIL** ❌ ← first failure - `739f905` (add test_one) → FAIL - `eec8918` (add test_two) → FAIL The build passes at the initial commit but fails starting at `da6c07c`. Since every subsequent commit also fails, the bug was introduced by the state transition from the last good commit (`3c956c9`) to the first bad commit (`da6c07c`). Therefore, **da6c07c "setup pytest"** is the commit that broke the build — likely a misconfiguration in the pytest setup itself, rather than the tests added later.
moonshotai/kimi-k3:low__json_schema PASS 100% 272 in → 197 out (177 reasoning)
8e6a558
moonshotai/kimi-k3:max PASS 100% 266 in → 170 out (151 reasoning)
ab1609f
moonshotai/kimi-k3:max__json_schema PASS 100% 268 in → 261 out (35 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `775c6a0` ("setup pytest")** **Reasoning:** Using a bisect-style analysis of the test results: - `f4475be` (Initial commit): **PASS** — the last known good commit - `775c6a0` (setup pytest): **FAIL** — the first commit where the failure appears - All subsequent commits (`8960c61`, `db883a3`) also fail Since the build transitioned from PASS to FAIL at `775c6a0`, this is the commit that introduced the bug. The later commits merely inherited the broken state. Note: The failure at "setup pytest" (rather than at "add test_one" or "add test_two") suggests the bug is in the pytest configuration itself — e.g., a broken `conftest.py`, a bad `pytest.ini`/`setup.cfg` option, or an import error in test configuration — rather than in any individual test, since the failure occurs before any tests were even added.
moonshotai/kimi-k3:medium PASS 100% 270 in → 319 out (120 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `85a6724` — "setup pytest"** **Reasoning:** Using bisect logic on the test results: | Commit | Result | |--------|--------| | 7c4f3ec Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | 85a6724 setup pytest | ❌ FAIL ← first failure | | 36aa8cd add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | 8edd05d add test_two | ❌ FAIL | The build passed at the initial commit (`7c4f3ec`) and first failed at `85a6724` ("setup pytest"). Since every subsequent commit also fails, the bug was introduced in **`85a6724`** — likely the pytest setup commit itself is broken (e.g., missing dependency, misconfigured test path, or a conftest/collection error causing exit code 1 even before any real tests existed).
moonshotai/kimi-k3:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 264 in → 505 out (267 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `3be5ca2` ("setup pytest")** **Reasoning:** Using bisection logic on the test results: | Commit | Result | |--------|--------| | `2bb099c` Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | `3be5ca2` setup pytest | ❌ FAIL ← **first failure** | | `cccefea` add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | `647673b` add test_two | ❌ FAIL | The build passes at `2bb099c` (Initial commit) and first fails at `3be5ca2` (setup pytest). Since every subsequent commit also fails, the bug was introduced at the transition point — commit **`3be5ca2`**. This is somewhat surprising (one might expect a test commit to be the culprit), but the "setup pytest" commit itself broke the build — likely due to a misconfiguration in the pytest setup (e.g., a bad `conftest.py`, broken import path, or invalid config file), which then caused all later commits to fail as well.
moonshotai/kimi-k3:xhigh PASS 100% 266 in → 132 out (34 reasoning)
**811600e** (setup pytest) This is the first commit where the build breaks. The Initial commit (e3627cb) passes with exit code 0, but starting with 811600e "setup pytest," every subsequent commit fails with exit code 1. Since the failures begin exactly at this commit and persist through all later commits, 811600e is the commit that introduced the bug.
moonshotai/kimi-k3:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 270 in → 423 out (244 reasoning)
**Bad commit: `aaa9a5d` — "setup pytest"** **Reasoning:** Working chronologically from the oldest commit: | Commit | Result | |---|---| | f0cc600 Initial commit | ✅ PASS | | aaa9a5d setup pytest | ❌ FAIL ← first failure | | c50eeec add test_one | ❌ FAIL | | 6c645d8 add test_two | ❌ FAIL | The transition from PASS to FAIL occurs at `aaa9a5d` ("setup pytest"). The initial commit passed, and every commit from "setup pytest" onward fails, so the bug was introduced by the pytest setup itself (e.g., a broken pytest configuration, a missing dependency, or a conftest.py error that prevents tests from collecting/running properly).
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:high PASS 100% 216 in → 339 out (359 reasoning)
55c7af2
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:high__json_schema PASS 100% 226 in → 272 out (244 reasoning)
30b7de5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "30b7de5" }
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:low PASS 100% 220 in → 636 out (649 reasoning)
\boxed{c9affc5}
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:low__json_schema PASS 100% 226 in → 286 out (252 reasoning)
26fb744
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "26fb744" }
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:medium PASS 100% 222 in → 433 out (410 reasoning)
e0fa247
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 224 in → 322 out (284 reasoning)
cae6d8d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "cae6d8d" }
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:none PASS 100% 228 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
d5f2410
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:none__json_schema PASS 100% 218 in → 16 out (0 reasoning)
45e8c26
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "45e8c26" }
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:xhigh PASS 100% 228 in → 696 out (648 reasoning)
\boxed{2b2e420}
nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 228 in → 297 out (279 reasoning)
770f241
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"770f241"}
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:high PASS 100% 220 in → 114 out (96 reasoning)
02394fb
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:high__json_schema PASS 100% 224 in → 150 out (115 reasoning)
786a03d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "786a03d" }
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:low PASS 100% 222 in → 122 out (104 reasoning)
5e307c4
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:low__json_schema PASS 100% 216 in → 162 out (139 reasoning)
4abefb6
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "4abefb6" }
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:medium PASS 100% 216 in → 143 out (124 reasoning)
e4ee556
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 220 in → 186 out (158 reasoning)
9ae1099
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9ae1099" }
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:none PASS 100% 222 in → 72 out (0 reasoning)
The test started failing at commit `63a6538 setup pytest` and remained failing in all subsequent commits. Since the initial commit (`fbd9be1`) passed, and the first failure appears at `63a6538`, this commit introduced the bug. **Answer:** `63a6538`
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:none__json_schema PASS 100% 222 in → 16 out (0 reasoning)
0a7a1e7
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "0a7a1e7" }
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:xhigh PASS 100% 222 in → 148 out (124 reasoning)
47acf7a
nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 220 in → 144 out (116 reasoning)
dc3c0b1
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "dc3c0b1" }
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:high PASS 100% 189 in → 102 out (91 reasoning)
a7a9236
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:high__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 107 out (87 reasoning)
46d16b5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"46d16b5"}
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:low PASS 100% 191 in → 41 out (31 reasoning)
da02fb1
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:low__json_schema PASS 100% 232 in → 58 out (38 reasoning)
ce92b5c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ce92b5c"}
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:medium PASS 100% 195 in → 58 out (46 reasoning)
9e7f5cf
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 238 in → 72 out (51 reasoning)
55a6c5c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"55a6c5c"}
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:none PASS 100% 187 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
975ca63
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:none__json_schema PASS 100% 228 in → 22 out (0 reasoning)
199e462
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"199e462"}
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:xhigh PASS 100% 187 in → 144 out (134 reasoning)
aa916c3
openai/gpt-5.4-mini:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 148 out (128 reasoning)
5c3fcc8
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5c3fcc8"}
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:high PASS 100% 195 in → 48 out (39 reasoning)
85afd14
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:high__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 63 out (44 reasoning)
1712cc6
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1712cc6"}
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:low PASS 100% 191 in → 32 out (22 reasoning)
4942e78
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:low__json_schema PASS 100% 226 in → 37 out (19 reasoning)
a316dbc
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a316dbc"}
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:medium PASS 100% 189 in → 43 out (32 reasoning)
6aaec8d
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 234 in → 62 out (41 reasoning)
01f9e1f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"01f9e1f"}
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:none PASS 100% 187 in → 10 out (0 reasoning)
ded2d78 setup pytest
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:none__json_schema PASS 100% 232 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
93d141f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"93d141f"}
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:xhigh PASS 100% 185 in → 169 out (159 reasoning)
dfa2fa3
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 186 out (168 reasoning)
986914e
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"986914e"}
openai/gpt-5.4:high PASS 100% 191 in → 59 out (49 reasoning)
97bdac7
openai/gpt-5.4:high__json_schema PASS 100% 228 in → 73 out (54 reasoning)
cbf848a
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"cbf848a"}
openai/gpt-5.4:low PASS 100% 193 in → 46 out (36 reasoning)
944cf0f
openai/gpt-5.4:low__json_schema PASS 100% 236 in → 38 out (19 reasoning)
ccc83b4
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ccc83b4"}
openai/gpt-5.4:medium PASS 100% 191 in → 46 out (35 reasoning)
06c30c6
openai/gpt-5.4:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 55 out (36 reasoning)
11ce3ec
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"11ce3ec"}
openai/gpt-5.4:none PASS 100% 195 in → 10 out (0 reasoning)
d4a94e6
openai/gpt-5.4:none__json_schema PASS 100% 238 in → 19 out (0 reasoning)
7d6f0ef
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7d6f0ef"}
openai/gpt-5.4:xhigh PASS 100% 183 in → 64 out (55 reasoning)
505ac06
openai/gpt-5.4:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 232 in → 112 out (93 reasoning)
66d611c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"66d611c"}
openai/gpt-5.5:high PASS 100% 191 in → 47 out (37 reasoning)
679a40f
openai/gpt-5.5:high__json_schema PASS 100% 234 in → 74 out (54 reasoning)
7e97fcd
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7e97fcd"}
openai/gpt-5.5:low PASS 100% 193 in → 26 out (17 reasoning)
040f378
openai/gpt-5.5:low__json_schema PASS 100% 226 in → 16 out (0 reasoning)
396354a
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"396354a"}
openai/gpt-5.5:medium PASS 100% 189 in → 30 out (20 reasoning)
50d07dc
openai/gpt-5.5:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 228 in → 16 out (0 reasoning)
3243683
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"3243683"}
openai/gpt-5.5:none PASS 100% 183 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
757db27
openai/gpt-5.5:none__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 19 out (0 reasoning)
1e11d3b
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1e11d3b"}
openai/gpt-5.5:xhigh PASS 100% 193 in → 57 out (47 reasoning)
fe2c307
openai/gpt-5.5:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 232 in → 94 out (75 reasoning)
d2917eb
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d2917eb"}
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:high PASS 100% 189 in → 43 out (33 reasoning)
71bed7f
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:high__json_schema PASS 100% 228 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
691b93d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"691b93d"}
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:low PASS 100% 183 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
8031b33
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:low__json_schema PASS 100% 238 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
0af586c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"0af586c"}
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:max PASS 100% 193 in → 84 out (72 reasoning)
d0d76f1
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:max__json_schema PASS 100% 232 in → 86 out (67 reasoning)
8a24066
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8a24066"}
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:medium PASS 100% 193 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
aa4ef5f
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 222 in → 16 out (0 reasoning)
753abc9
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"753abc9"}
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:none PASS 100% 187 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
a696068
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:none__json_schema PASS 100% 226 in → 18 out (0 reasoning)
63d46f6
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"63d46f6"}
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:xhigh PASS 100% 185 in → 41 out (31 reasoning)
03b406f
openai/gpt-5.6-luna:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 16 out (0 reasoning)
804586a
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"804586a"}
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:high PASS 100% 191 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
eb2d807
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:high__json_schema PASS 100% 228 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
c036dc5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c036dc5"}
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:low PASS 100% 191 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
c0bffa5
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:low__json_schema PASS 100% 232 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
df2c031
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"df2c031"}
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:max PASS 100% 195 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
14d54cf
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:max__json_schema PASS 100% 236 in → 18 out (0 reasoning)
9da67d2
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"9da67d2"}
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:medium PASS 100% 187 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
10968d7
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 234 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
2cd2924
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2cd2924"}
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:none PASS 100% 193 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
79d6ed9
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:none__json_schema PASS 100% 234 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
1e34fde
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1e34fde"}
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:xhigh PASS 100% 189 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
018586c
openai/gpt-5.6-sol:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 224 in → 16 out (0 reasoning)
c836565
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c836565"}
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:high PASS 100% 189 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
0a783fd
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:high__json_schema PASS 100% 234 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
a069bd0
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a069bd0"}
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:low PASS 100% 187 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
a178776
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:low__json_schema PASS 100% 228 in → 16 out (0 reasoning)
c205825
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c205825"}
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:max PASS 100% 191 in → 52 out (40 reasoning)
c3c77d8
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:max__json_schema PASS 100% 226 in → 67 out (48 reasoning)
b71683b
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b71683b"}
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:medium PASS 100% 189 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
cef3093
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 234 in → 18 out (0 reasoning)
a6681e9
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a6681e9"}
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:none PASS 100% 191 in → 9 out (0 reasoning)
22caa5d
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:none__json_schema PASS 100% 236 in → 16 out (0 reasoning)
2463cef
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2463cef"}
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:xhigh PASS 100% 193 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
e2fd704
openai/gpt-5.6-terra:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 230 in → 63 out (43 reasoning)
6af2f48
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6af2f48"}
openai/gpt-oss-120b:high PASS 100% 254 in → 472 out (453 reasoning)
c0a9ac2 (setup pytest)
openai/gpt-oss-120b:high__json_schema PASS 100% 239 in → 303 out (264 reasoning)
61b4a0a
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "61b4a0a" }
openai/gpt-oss-120b:low PASS 100% 252 in → 171 out (137 reasoning)
5cfd7e8 (setup pytest)
openai/gpt-oss-120b:low__json_schema PASS 100% 395 in → 60 out (42 reasoning)
8bbeac7
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8bbeac7"}
openai/gpt-oss-120b:medium PASS 100% 252 in → 212 out (193 reasoning)
3602fef — setup pytest
openai/gpt-oss-120b:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 248 in → 93 out (74 reasoning)
1281c03
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "1281c03" }
openai/gpt-oss-120b:xhigh PASS 100% 244 in → 301 out (295 reasoning)
d697565 – setup pytest
openai/gpt-oss-120b:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 258 in → 310 out (329 reasoning)
f6827f8
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f6827f8"}
openai/gpt-oss-20b:high PASS 100% 256 in → 419 out (414 reasoning)
a84a31f
openai/gpt-oss-20b:high__json_schema PASS 100% 254 in → 1,299 out (1,299 reasoning)
e2c4858
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e2c4858"}
openai/gpt-oss-20b:low PASS 100% 246 in → 425 out (421 reasoning)
84f8744
openai/gpt-oss-20b:medium PASS 100% 257 in → 251 out (246 reasoning)
bf37ec7 (The “setup pytest” commit broke the build.)
openai/gpt-oss-20b:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 237 in → 348 out (313 reasoning)
f753c02
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "f753c02" }
openai/gpt-oss-20b:xhigh PASS 100% 248 in → 625 out (621 reasoning)
c85928f
openai/gpt-oss-20b:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 250 in → 559 out (531 reasoning)
e4f2fc6
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e4f2fc6"}
poolside/laguna-m.1:high PASS 100% 214 in → 871 out (798 reasoning)
The bad commit is **f70ab82**. This is the first commit where the build fails (transitioning from PASS in the initial commit to FAIL in "setup pytest"). Subsequent failing commits likely did not resolve the issue, making "setup pytest" the point where the bug was introduced. Answer: f70ab82
poolside/laguna-m.1:high__json_schema PASS 100% 218 in → 586 out (570 reasoning)
28aaf5f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "28aaf5f" }
poolside/laguna-m.1:low PASS 100% 224 in → 1,427 out (1,417 reasoning)
8a47783
poolside/laguna-m.1:low__json_schema PASS 100% 222 in → 389 out (375 reasoning)
c4689c6
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c4689c6"}
poolside/laguna-m.1:medium PASS 100% 226 in → 338 out (281 reasoning)
The first commit that caused the tests to fail is the "setup pytest" commit. The Initial commit passed, and all subsequent commits failed. The earliest failing commit is **30b7536**. **Answer:** 30b7536
poolside/laguna-m.1:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 222 in → 1,661 out (1,648 reasoning)
be25695
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "be25695"}
poolside/laguna-m.1:none PASS 100% 220 in → 362 out (0 reasoning)
To identify the bad commit, we'll use a binary search approach to efficiently narrow down the problematic commit. Here's the step-by-step process: 1. **Initial Setup**: - The total range of commits is from `93ae2d5` (oldest) to `02bca61` (newest). - Testing reveals the initial build (`93ae2d5`) works, while the most recent (`02bca61`) does not. 2. **First Binary Search**: - We test the middle commit, `01fa344`, and find the build **fails**. This tells us the bug was introduced in or before this commit. We now focus on the range `93ae2d5` to `01fa344`. 3. **Second Binary Search**: - We further narrow it down by testing the midway point between `93ae2d5` and `01fa344`, which is approximately `2f0c381`. Testing shows this build also **fails**, narrowing our range to `93ae2d5` and `2f0c381`. 4. **Final Check**: - We test the next midpoint, but since the range is now small, we directly check the first commit after the last known good one, which is `01fa344`. Given that this commit marked the transition from PASS to FAIL in the initial test results, we conclude this is where the bug was introduced. **Conclusion**: The commit `01fa344` (setup pytest) introduced the bug. \boxed{01fa344}
poolside/laguna-m.1:none__json_schema PASS 100% 220 in → 18 out (0 reasoning)
6a1870d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "6a1870d" }
poolside/laguna-m.1:xhigh PASS 100% 218 in → 919 out (911 reasoning)
2b5dfec
poolside/laguna-m.1:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 224 in → 782 out (763 reasoning)
3696668
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "3696668" }
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:high PASS 100% 224 in → 532 out (481 reasoning)
The first failing commit is `776a092 setup pytest`, which introduced the build failure. All subsequent commits inherit this issue, but the root cause is the "setup pytest" commit. 776a092
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:high__json_schema PASS 100% 222 in → 221 out (208 reasoning)
8979de8
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "8979de8"}
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:low PASS 100% 220 in → 423 out (386 reasoning)
The bad commit is **c860793** (setup pytest). The tests passed before this commit and failed immediately afterward, indicating it introduced the build-breaking change.
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:low__json_schema PASS 100% 224 in → 405 out (393 reasoning)
4fcf59a
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4fcf59a"}
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:medium PASS 100% 224 in → 445 out (358 reasoning)
The bad commit is **812f5f6**. The test results show that after the "Initial commit" (which passed), the "setup pytest" commit (812f5f6) introduced a failure. Subsequent commits (adding tests) did not fix the issue, meaning the root cause was introduced in the setup pytest commit. **Answer:** 812f5f6
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 218 in → 288 out (275 reasoning)
ef69b37
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ef69b37"}
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:none PASS 100% 216 in → 4 out (0 reasoning)
adec708
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:none__json_schema PASS 100% 220 in → 12 out (0 reasoning)
0ec2265
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "0ec2265"}
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:xhigh PASS 100% 226 in → 295 out (175 reasoning)
The bad commit is **fa1d633** (setup pytest). **Explanation:** - The initial commit (`d89257b`) passed all tests. - The next commit (`fa1d633`) introduced a failure, which indicates it is the first problematic change. - Subsequent commits (`6a33d27`, `d1e0938`) inherited the failure but did not fix it. Thus, `fa1d633` is the commit that introduced the bug.
poolside/laguna-xs-2.1:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 222 in → 634 out (621 reasoning)
9a2bb1a
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "9a2bb1a"}
poolside/laguna-xs.2:high PASS 100% 255 in → 346 out (266 reasoning)
Looking at the test results chronologically: - 308b803 Initial commit: PASS - 0ca7e16 setup pytest: FAIL (first failure) The tests were passing in the initial commit but failed starting with the "setup pytest" commit. This is the commit that introduced the bug. **0ca7e16**
poolside/laguna-xs.2:high__json_schema PASS 100% 251 in → 312 out (293 reasoning)
e41c2a5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "e41c2a5" }
poolside/laguna-xs.2:low PASS 100% 261 in → 408 out (287 reasoning)
Looking at the test results chronologically: 1. **a68d350 Initial commit**: PASS ✅ 2. **adc82a2 setup pytest**: FAIL ❌ 3. **656a2b8 add test_one**: FAIL ❌ 4. **5944282 add test_two**: FAIL ❌ The tests pass on the initial commit but fail starting with the "setup pytest" commit. This indicates that the bug was introduced when pytest was set up. **Bad commit: adc82a2**
poolside/laguna-xs.2:low__json_schema PASS 100% 259 in → 260 out (246 reasoning)
01a1e64
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "01a1e64"}
poolside/laguna-xs.2:medium PASS 100% 257 in → 402 out (312 reasoning)
Based on the test results, I can see that: 1. `30db5d6` (Initial commit): PASS 2. `bbabf14` (setup pytest): FAIL The tests were passing after the initial commit, but failed after the "setup pytest" commit. This means the bug was introduced in commit `bbabf14`. The bad commit is: **bbabf14**
poolside/laguna-xs.2:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 255 in → 355 out (342 reasoning)
26df22b
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "26df22b"}
poolside/laguna-xs.2:none PASS 100% 259 in → 132 out (0 reasoning)
Looking at the commit history and test results, I can see the pattern: - **d8e36cc Initial commit**: PASS - **d22d224 setup pytest**: FAIL - **01c9303 add test_one**: FAIL - **b2c0cae add test_two**: FAIL The first commit where the tests started failing is **d22d224 setup pytest**. This commit introduced pytest setup, which likely broke the build. The bug was introduced by this commit since all subsequent commits also fail. **Bad commit: d22d224**
poolside/laguna-xs.2:none__json_schema PASS 100% 255 in → 13 out (0 reasoning)
739d297
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "739d297"}
poolside/laguna-xs.2:xhigh PASS 100% 259 in → 298 out (220 reasoning)
Looking at the test results chronologically: 1. **12ac4af Initial commit**: PASS 2. **63928b8 setup pytest**: FAIL The Initial commit passes, but the very next commit "setup pytest" fails. This means the commit **63928b8** is the bad commit that introduced the bug.
poolside/laguna-xs.2:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 261 in → 291 out (278 reasoning)
0d748af
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "0d748af"}
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:high PASS 100% 218 in → 962 out (753 reasoning)
977f5a7
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:high__json_schema PASS 100% 220 in → 1,026 out (769 reasoning)
584b0a9
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "584b0a9" }
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:low PASS 100% 220 in → 1,101 out (884 reasoning)
ccc3c5e setup pytest
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:low__json_schema PASS 100% 220 in → 20 out (0 reasoning)
37044f6 setup pytest
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "37044f6 setup pytest" }
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:medium PASS 100% 222 in → 811 out (648 reasoning)
5246f13
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 216 in → 776 out (1 reasoning)
4bc8701
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "4bc8701" }
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:none PASS 100% 216 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
f6a7a89
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:none__json_schema PASS 100% 220 in → 17 out (0 reasoning)
0806fb5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "0806fb5" }
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:xhigh PASS 100% 220 in → 440 out (330 reasoning)
850272d
qwen/qwen3.6-27b:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 214 in → 890 out (717 reasoning)
f1bbd5c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "f1bbd5c" }
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:high PASS 100% 214 in → 515 out (432 reasoning)
91bf592
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:high__json_schema PASS 100% 218 in → 686 out (542 reasoning)
89fe2a3
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "89fe2a3" }
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:low PASS 100% 224 in → 637 out (485 reasoning)
4207f58
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:low__json_schema PASS 100% 222 in → 414 out (308 reasoning)
7a02d8f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "7a02d8f" }
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:medium PASS 100% 212 in → 397 out (387 reasoning)
8fdfc68
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 216 in → 566 out (440 reasoning)
973b6e8
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "973b6e8" }
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:none PASS 100% 224 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
83d84e4
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:none__json_schema PASS 100% 220 in → 18 out (0 reasoning)
4200781
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "4200781" }
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:xhigh PASS 100% 220 in → 370 out (359 reasoning)
9580bf3
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 216 in → 810 out (627 reasoning)
0b7702e
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "0b7702e" }
qwen/qwen3.6-flash:high PASS 100% 216 in → 386 out (362 reasoning)
The bad commit that introduced the bug is: **7e6a59e**
qwen/qwen3.6-flash:low PASS 100% 214 in → 481 out (469 reasoning)
b2f5238
qwen/qwen3.6-flash:medium PASS 100% 222 in → 525 out (513 reasoning)
32b01a2
qwen/qwen3.6-flash:xhigh PASS 100% 220 in → 963 out (952 reasoning)
d60e0cf
qwen/qwen3.7-flash:high PASS 100% 222 in → 455 out (443 reasoning)
14d3a8f
qwen/qwen3.7-flash:low PASS 100% 218 in → 366 out (354 reasoning)
08d99c5
qwen/qwen3.7-flash:max PASS 100% 224 in → 375 out (363 reasoning)
2713727
qwen/qwen3.7-flash:medium PASS 100% 220 in → 539 out (528 reasoning)
61bc40a
qwen/qwen3.7-flash:none PASS 100% 218 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
6b68963
qwen/qwen3.7-flash:none__json_schema PASS 100% 216 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
a5111b1
qwen/qwen3.7-flash:xhigh PASS 100% 216 in → 477 out (465 reasoning)
d4045b9
qwen/qwen3.7-max:high PASS 100% 220 in → 352 out (187 reasoning)
The bad commit is **cdd7786** (setup pytest). **Reasoning:** Looking at the test results chronologically: - `e1760b6` (Initial commit) → **PASS** - `cdd7786` (setup pytest) → **FAIL** ← First failure - `6f4ee95` (add test_one) → FAIL - `9719e52` (add test_two) → FAIL The build passed at `e1760b6` and first failed at `cdd7786`, making it the commit that introduced the bug. The subsequent commits remain broken because the issue from `cdd7786` was never fixed.
qwen/qwen3.7-max:low PASS 100% 218 in → 233 out (154 reasoning)
The bad commit is **0ff2fb9** ("setup pytest"). The test results show that `1692b84` (Initial commit) passes, but `0ff2fb9` (setup pytest) is the first commit to fail. Since all subsequent commits also fail, the bug was introduced at `0ff2fb9`.
qwen/qwen3.7-max:medium PASS 100% 220 in → 332 out (232 reasoning)
The bad commit is **9a69354** (`setup pytest`). **Reasoning:** Looking at the test results chronologically, the build passes at `6654950` (Initial commit) and then fails at `9a69354` (setup pytest) and every subsequent commit. The transition from PASS to FAIL occurs at `9a69354`, making it the commit that introduced the bug.
qwen/qwen3.7-max:none PASS 100% 216 in → 60 out (0 reasoning)
Based on the test results, the transition from PASS to FAIL occurs between commit `2f56e81` (PASS) and commit `2e48ac6` (FAIL). Therefore, the bad commit that introduced the bug is: **2e48ac6**
qwen/qwen3.7-max:xhigh PASS 100% 222 in → 236 out (224 reasoning)
33b7c4f
qwen/qwen3.7-plus:high PASS 100% 220 in → 314 out (205 reasoning)
The bad commit is **668f775** (`setup pytest`). Here's the reasoning: - **8532fae** (Initial commit): PASS ✅ - **668f775** (setup pytest): FAIL ❌ The test results went from passing to failing at commit `668f775`. Every subsequent commit also fails, but the first commit that *introduced* the bug is `668f775`.
qwen/qwen3.7-plus:low PASS 100% 216 in → 258 out (188 reasoning)
The bad commit is **05be6fd** (setup pytest). The last known good commit is `98fff1c` (Initial commit), which passes. The very next commit, `05be6fd` (setup pytest), is the first one to fail, meaning it introduced the bug.
qwen/qwen3.7-plus:medium PASS 100% 222 in → 282 out (201 reasoning)
The bad commit is **4a1f8a6** ("setup pytest"). The last known good commit is `f627505` (Initial commit: PASS), and the first failing commit is `4a1f8a6` (setup pytest: FAIL). This means the bug was introduced in `4a1f8a6`.
qwen/qwen3.7-plus:none PASS 100% 222 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
9c9a666
qwen/qwen3.7-plus:xhigh PASS 100% 216 in → 671 out (539 reasoning)
Looking at the test results chronologically: - **f5718b0** Initial commit: ✅ PASS - **077caf4** setup pytest: ❌ FAIL - **5c4d2da** add test_one: ❌ FAIL - **b451ee9** add test_two: ❌ FAIL The transition from **PASS** to **FAIL** occurs at commit `077caf4`. This is the first commit where the build breaks, making it the bad commit. **Bad commit: `077caf4`** (`setup pytest`)
tencent/hy3:high PASS 100% 193 in → 926 out (920 reasoning)
f18379e
tencent/hy3:high__json_schema PASS 100% 191 in → 828 out (808 reasoning)
558c228
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "558c228" }
tencent/hy3:low PASS 100% 197 in → 609 out (527 reasoning)
46834c5
tencent/hy3:low__json_schema PASS 100% 193 in → 1,164 out (1,094 reasoning)
a7d2838
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "a7d2838" }
tencent/hy3:medium PASS 100% 189 in → 1,735 out (1,730 reasoning)
bec15ff
tencent/hy3:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 197 in → 777 out (649 reasoning)
7e4597c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "7e4597c" }
tencent/hy3:none PASS 100% 202 in → 5 out (0 reasoning)
42f3525
tencent/hy3:xhigh PASS 100% 197 in → 714 out (707 reasoning)
23f87a1
tencent/hy3:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 199 in → 804 out (754 reasoning)
9d46635
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9d46635" }
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:high PASS 100% 200 in → 178 out (130 reasoning)
The first failing commit is **111dd8b** (`setup pytest`). 111dd8b
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:high__json_schema PASS 100% 198 in → 140 out (123 reasoning)
07d1522
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "07d1522" }
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:low PASS 100% 202 in → 26 out (15 reasoning)
85e0f83
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:low__json_schema PASS 100% 198 in → 29 out (14 reasoning)
046541e
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "046541e" }
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:max PASS 100% 202 in → 336 out (271 reasoning)
The first failing commit is the one that broke the build. **95922f5** (subject: "setup pytest")
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:max__json_schema PASS 100% 196 in → 423 out (405 reasoning)
dfdd8e8
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "dfdd8e8" }
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:medium PASS 100% 202 in → 143 out (130 reasoning)
2b9e3b7
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 202 in → 130 out (112 reasoning)
8b14b1c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "8b14b1c" }
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:none PASS 100% 208 in → 8 out (0 reasoning)
b8ebf62<|end_message|>
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:xhigh PASS 100% 204 in → 146 out (135 reasoning)
1ddf10f
thinkingmachines/inkling-small:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 200 in → 155 out (139 reasoning)
0509caa
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "0509caa" }
thinkingmachines/inkling:high PASS 100% 196 in → 167 out (124 reasoning)
The build first fails at commit **4144301** (`setup pytest`), so that is the bad commit. **Answer:** `4144301` (or `setup pytest`)
thinkingmachines/inkling:low PASS 100% 198 in → 27 out (15 reasoning)
b9acfd1
thinkingmachines/inkling:low__json_schema PASS 100% 200 in → 56 out (38 reasoning)
2a842c6
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "2a842c6" }
thinkingmachines/inkling:max PASS 100% 196 in → 114 out (102 reasoning)
929c9e4
thinkingmachines/inkling:max__json_schema PASS 100% 196 in → 134 out (121 reasoning)
064eeec
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "064eeec"}
thinkingmachines/inkling:medium PASS 100% 202 in → 72 out (61 reasoning)
3b621cd
thinkingmachines/inkling:none PASS 100% 194 in → 6 out (0 reasoning)
3023875<|end_message|>
thinkingmachines/inkling:xhigh PASS 100% 200 in → 143 out (106 reasoning)
The build first fails at `a97da6f`, so the bad commit is: **a97da6f** (or "setup pytest")
thinkingmachines/inkling:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 196 in → 147 out (131 reasoning)
b12521a
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "b12521a" }
x-ai/grok-4.3:high PASS 100% 376 in → 660 out (654 reasoning)
20b2f6a
x-ai/grok-4.3:high__json_schema PASS 100% 427 in → 450 out (441 reasoning)
ce30e9b
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ce30e9b"}
x-ai/grok-4.3:low PASS 100% 370 in → 385 out (294 reasoning)
The test results show that the repository builds and tests pass on the initial commit (1dd339f). All later commits fail. Since the first failure occurs immediately after 5691893, that commit is the one that introduced the breaking change. (The subsequent commits 676f8a6 and 4936452 also fail, but they cannot be the root cause because the build was already broken before they were added.) Final answer: 5691893
x-ai/grok-4.3:low__json_schema PASS 100% 433 in → 363 out (355 reasoning)
5a69536
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5a69536"}
x-ai/grok-4.3:max PASS 100% 366 in → 739 out (735 reasoning)
f2ddd08
x-ai/grok-4.3:max__json_schema PASS 100% 429 in → 439 out (432 reasoning)
4989067
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"4989067"}
x-ai/grok-4.3:medium PASS 100% 380 in → 471 out (403 reasoning)
The build passes on the initial commit but fails starting with `d62d27a`. All later commits continue to fail, which is expected once a breaking change has been introduced and not reverted. Therefore `d62d27a` (subject: "setup pytest") is the single bad commit. Final answer: d62d27a
x-ai/grok-4.3:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 433 in → 366 out (355 reasoning)
a16e1f1
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "a16e1f1"}
x-ai/grok-4.3:none PASS 100% 368 in → 5 out (0 reasoning)
f8a242e
x-ai/grok-4.3:none__json_schema PASS 100% 427 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
1914276
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1914276"}
x-ai/grok-4.3:xhigh PASS 100% 366 in → 472 out (468 reasoning)
02f231f
x-ai/grok-4.3:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 433 in → 671 out (663 reasoning)
b34ad10
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b34ad10"}
x-ai/grok-4.5:high PASS 100% 392 in → 482 out (413 reasoning)
**d72969e** (or "setup pytest") The test results show a clear transition: - 8d058f0 (Initial commit) → PASS - d72969e (setup pytest) → FAIL - All later commits remain FAIL Thus d72969e is the first commit that broke the build.
x-ai/grok-4.5:high__json_schema PASS 100% 463 in → 223 out (214 reasoning)
be763f1
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"be763f1"}
x-ai/grok-4.5:low PASS 100% 390 in → 170 out (167 reasoning)
56ebe94
x-ai/grok-4.5:low__json_schema PASS 100% 467 in → 209 out (199 reasoning)
cd7da8c
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"cd7da8c"}
x-ai/grok-4.5:max PASS 100% 392 in → 252 out (249 reasoning)
2004416
x-ai/grok-4.5:max__json_schema PASS 100% 465 in → 275 out (267 reasoning)
7300eda
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7300eda"}
x-ai/grok-4.5:medium PASS 100% 400 in → 266 out (260 reasoning)
8a6ff2c
x-ai/grok-4.5:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 469 in → 191 out (181 reasoning)
04c34a4
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"04c34a4"}
x-ai/grok-4.5:xhigh PASS 100% 396 in → 276 out (271 reasoning)
00fbb1c
x-ai/grok-4.5:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 463 in → 224 out (216 reasoning)
299338d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"299338d"}
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash:high PASS 100% 188 in → 543 out (492 reasoning)
805ec3a
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash:high__json_schema PASS 100% 192 in → 509 out (440 reasoning)
985f459
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "985f459" }
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash:low PASS 100% 192 in → 650 out (550 reasoning)
1fcb70b
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash:medium PASS 100% 186 in → 536 out (462 reasoning)
26df514
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash:none PASS 100% 190 in → 7 out (0 reasoning)
511835d setup pytest
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash:none__json_schema PASS 100% 190 in → 12 out (0 reasoning)
7020aab
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "7020aab" }
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash:xhigh PASS 100% 192 in → 457 out (377 reasoning)
e2de309
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 194 in → 759 out (620 reasoning)
410504d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "410504d" }
z-ai/glm-5.2:high PASS 100% 201 in → 185 out (178 reasoning)
2bf396a
z-ai/glm-5.2:high__json_schema PASS 100% 195 in → 108 out (96 reasoning)
488a043
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "488a043"}
z-ai/glm-5.2:low PASS 100% 199 in → 152 out (128 reasoning)
ffbb0fa
z-ai/glm-5.2:low__json_schema PASS 100% 201 in → 103 out (74 reasoning)
ddf071d
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "ddf071d" }
z-ai/glm-5.2:medium PASS 100% 197 in → 183 out (177 reasoning)
febda7a
z-ai/glm-5.2:medium__json_schema PASS 100% 201 in → 181 out (165 reasoning)
cbf0ce5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "cbf0ce5" }
z-ai/glm-5.2:none PASS 100% 193 in → 6 out (0 reasoning)
4256ccf
z-ai/glm-5.2:none__json_schema PASS 100% 191 in → 13 out (0 reasoning)
632236f
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "632236f" }
z-ai/glm-5.2:xhigh PASS 100% 199 in → 228 out (197 reasoning)
d14ceb5
z-ai/glm-5.2:xhigh__json_schema PASS 100% 199 in → 114 out (108 reasoning)
986c323
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "986c323" }
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: d13d356
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: 3{ "commit": "3a314c6" }
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
liquid/lfm-2-24b-a2b FAIL 0% 210 in → 77 out
The **bad commit** is `0b87390` because it is the first commit in the list of failures after the initial clean state (`cefdc0d` passed). Since all subsequent commits failed, but the earliest failure after a clean base is typically the culprit, this commit likely introduced the bug. **Answer:** `0b87390`
Failure: Expected target hash/prefix or subject 'setup pytest'
Invalid JSON. Output: The **bad commit** is `03951a2` because it is the earliest commit in the list that caused the build to fail (`setup pytest` failed). **Answer:** `03951a2`
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
openai/gpt-oss-20b:low__json_schema FAIL 0% 260 in → 62 out (33 reasoning)
9f77a5
JSON Schema Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9f77a5" }
Failure: Expected target hash/prefix or subject 'setup pytest'
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-f69ea28f-ca5c-9835-acd8-de3196115bd4","request_id":"f69ea28f-ca5c-9835-acd8-de3196115bd4"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-de226068-fdab-9222-abad-606be87189ee","request_id":"de226068-fdab-9222-abad-606be87189ee"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-880e60ca-23a4-9fe6-950f-f53617e72c95","request_id":"880e60ca-23a4-9fe6-950f-f53617e72c95"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
qwen/qwen3.6-flash:none FAIL 0% 216 in → 6 out (0 reasoning)
8fd398f
Failure: Expected target hash/prefix or subject 'setup pytest'
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-0bd815d9-920d-9172-a25a-049f291cc8bc","request_id":"0bd815d9-920d-9172-a25a-049f291cc8bc"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-d7628786-1d8d-9696-8395-ecbb50825314","request_id":"d7628786-1d8d-9696-8395-ecbb50825314"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-3cc9027c-6761-9efd-b962-8eb6e997ae01"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-913ef205-6776-9553-8a29-6eda9c0874e7"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-896cea3e-f92f-9d61-86fa-b654e733c432"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-d56163fa-0057-90ce-8ddf-f83cf0d30ec0"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-200cd33d-0dab-9871-8c3b-062dac3fcc02"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-44f52dc9-a5fb-9a25-b94a-b2194da46e87","request_id":"44f52dc9-a5fb-9a25-b94a-b2194da46e87"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-15f70e89-997e-94a3-b7f5-90f3b220d478","request_id":"15f70e89-997e-94a3-b7f5-90f3b220d478"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-2ee42328-a5b7-9028-8255-cc257bc58c58","request_id":"2ee42328-a5b7-9028-8255-cc257bc58c58"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-8bccca54-7ce5-9c39-be75-c74635e66569","request_id":"8bccca54-7ce5-9c39-be75-c74635e66569"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-d0f5bd93-00fa-9cc5-afd5-4c0b18152fc5","request_id":"d0f5bd93-00fa-9cc5-afd5-4c0b18152fc5"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-6377bca7-7054-93c7-8e9d-f884d03fa673","request_id":"6377bca7-7054-93c7-8e9d-f884d03fa673"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-292e1db8-3150-91dd-8e10-f407394365e8","request_id":"292e1db8-3150-91dd-8e10-f407394365e8"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-3e9e3960-88ce-9dfa-895a-fc6d64f01342","request_id":"3e9e3960-88ce-9dfa-895a-fc6d64f01342"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-8463fc2f-be6a-9ac4-88f3-00e634047a21","request_id":"8463fc2f-be6a-9ac4-88f3-00e634047a21"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-9d341280-0084-90ee-9e25-2cc58850d149","request_id":"9d341280-0084-90ee-9e25-2cc58850d149"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Failure: Model 'tencent/hy3:none' violated the reasoning_level=none invariant: provider reported 807 reasoning token(s)
Invalid JSON. Output: 5bef47a{"commit":"5bef47a"}
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Invalid JSON. Output: The first commit that fails is **bcf1fc5** (`setup pytest`), since the build was passing before it and fails from there onward. Answer: `bcf1fc5` (or `setup pytest`)
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: The build was passing at `77f1be1` and first failed at `11ef3f2`, so that commit introduced the bug. **11ef3f2** (or "setup pytest")
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: 2a9dce1{ "commit": "2a9dce1" }
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)