Branching history with bad commit that removes validation - model identifies the bad commit
Tests ability to identify a commit that removed validation logic via bisect. Evaluates bisect for a regression that removes safety checks.
Baseline Repository
These commands set up the repo before the model sees the prompt. They define the starting file structure, staged changes, and Git history.
- 01
git init - 02
git config user.email 'test@test.com' - 03
git config user.name 'Test User' - 04
echo '#!/bin/bash' > test.sh - 05
echo 'grep -q "if not data" src/auth.py' >> test.sh - 06
chmod +x test.sh - 07
mkdir -p src && echo 'def validate_input(data): if not data: return False return True' > src/auth.py - 08
git add test.sh src/auth.py && git commit -m 'Initial commit' - 09
echo '# validation enabled' >> src/auth.py - 10
git add src/auth.py && git commit -m 'add validation function' - 11
echo 'def validate_input(data): return True' > src/auth.py - 12
git add src/auth.py && git commit -m 'remove validation logic' - 13
git checkout -b feature - 14
echo '# auth logging enabled' >> src/auth.py - 15
git add src/auth.py && git commit -m 'add auth logging' - 16
git checkout main - 17
git merge feature
Prompt
You are debugging a git repository. The following commit history has one bad commit that broke the build. Identify the bad commit hash (first 7 characters) or commit subject line that introduced the bug. Use the git log and test output to determine which commit is bad.
Your answer should be the commit hash (e.g., 'abc1234') or the commit subject line.
Expected
remove validation logic
Fixture Metrics
Scoped model quality, cost, API time, and token usage for git_bisect/f008.
Loading...
Raw Attempt Evidence
Loading raw attempt evidence…
Model Outputs (546)
The bad commit is **449cc95** — "remove validation logic"
**Reasoning:**
- `f7b889f` (Initial commit): PASS
- `5a9475a` (add validation function): PASS
- `449cc95` (remove validation logic): **FAIL** ← first failing commit
- `e59cf65` (add auth logging): FAIL (inherited the breakage)
The build was passing until `449cc95`, which removed validation logic that the code (or tests) still depended on, breaking the build. All subsequent commits fail as a result.
e04899e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "e04899e"}
18c3dcb — "remove validation logic" is the bad commit (first failing commit; tests passed before it and fail from it onward).
e42984e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "e42984e"}
**Bad commit: `3be9fc1` — "remove validation logic"**
**Reasoning (bisect logic):**
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| b551aeb | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 55101c4 | add validation function | ✅ PASS |
| **3be9fc1** | **remove validation logic** | ❌ **FAIL** ← first failure |
| 4926830 | add auth logging | ❌ FAIL |
The build passed through `55101c4` and first failed at `3be9fc1`. Since every commit before it is good and every commit from that point onward is bad, `3be9fc1` ("remove validation logic") is the commit that introduced the bug. The subsequent commit `4926830` fails only because it's built on top of the broken change.
The subject line also supports this: removing validation logic that a prior commit added likely broke tests that depended on it.
5baf178
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "5baf178"}
**3952ba1** — "remove validation logic"
The tests pass through `1b0d59c` and first fail at `3952ba1`, so that commit introduced the break (likely removing validation logic that other code still depended on).
0536bea
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "0536bea"}
**Bad commit: `9e41897` — "remove validation logic"**
**Reasoning (bisect logic):**
| Commit | Subject | Test Result |
|--------|---------|-------------|
| e12374c | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 683f551 | add validation function | ✅ PASS |
| 9e41897 | remove validation logic | ❌ FAIL ← first failure |
| 2178436 | add auth logging | ❌ FAIL |
The tests pass through `683f551` and first fail at `9e41897`. Since the build was healthy immediately before and broken immediately after, `9e41897` ("remove validation logic") is the commit that introduced the bug — removing the validation logic evidently broke functionality that the tests depend on. The subsequent commit (`2178436`) just inherits the broken state.
2d70a15
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "2d70a15"}
# Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
1. **98b40bc** (Initial commit): PASS ✓
2. **eabe4f7** (add validation function): PASS ✓
3. **6ef1fe3** (remove validation logic): FAIL ✗
4. **7330b96** (add auth logging): FAIL ✗
The build transitioned from PASS to FAIL at commit **6ef1fe3**. This is where the validation logic was removed, which broke the build.
**Answer: `6ef1fe3`** or **`remove validation logic`**
c4dd7cd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c4dd7cd"}
# Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
1. 8858986 (Initial commit): **PASS** ✓
2. 8dbb522 (add validation function): **PASS** ✓
3. 5c47e2d (remove validation logic): **FAIL** ✗ ← First failure
4. 45ebcd5 (add auth logging): **FAIL** ✗
The build passes through commit 8dbb522, but fails starting with commit 5c47e2d. This is the first commit where tests fail.
**Answer: `5c47e2d`** (or "remove validation logic")
211b03d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "211b03d"}
# Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
- ✅ 5438fce Initial commit: PASS
- ✅ 4cf7fb6 add validation function: PASS
- ❌ 980b62d remove validation logic: **FAIL** ← First failure
- ❌ 90e5a74 add auth logging: FAIL
The first commit where tests fail is **980b62d**. The commit "remove validation logic" broke the build, likely by removing necessary validation that the code depends on.
**Answer: `980b62d`** (or "remove validation logic")
77fa9a1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "77fa9a1"}
# Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
1. **012eb6e** (Initial commit): PASS ✓
2. **a0f4184** (add validation function): PASS ✓
3. **0a21f86** (remove validation logic): FAIL ✗
4. **ceda77d** (add auth logging): FAIL ✗
The first commit where tests started failing is **0a21f86**.
## Answer
**0a21f86** (or "remove validation logic")
This commit introduced the bug. The removal of validation logic broke the build, and the subsequent commit (ceda77d) did not fix the issue.
27cf3c1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "27cf3c1"}
# Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
1. **1bbbb62** (Initial commit): PASS ✓
2. **4d2c651** (add validation function): PASS ✓
3. **088297d** (remove validation logic): **FAIL** ✗ ← First failure
4. **eb87dfc** (add auth logging): FAIL (inherits the broken state)
The build was passing through the first two commits, then broke at commit **088297d**. While the next commit also fails, that's because it built on top of the already-broken state.
**Answer: `088297d`** (or "remove validation logic")
2da97b0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "2da97b0"}
The bad commit is **528d372** (`remove validation logic`).
This is the first commit where tests begin failing (exit code 1), while all prior commits pass. The subsequent commit (`d8cf20a`) also fails because it builds on top of the already-broken state introduced by `528d372`.
1af6d3e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1af6d3e"}
24cd6bc
b3b1fc1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b3b1fc1"}
## Bad Commit Identified
**`4e101db`** — *remove validation logic*
### Reasoning
Examining the test results chronologically:
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| befe85e | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 5a90cde | add validation function | ✅ PASS |
| **4e101db** | **remove validation logic** | **❌ FAIL** |
| 940e58d | add auth logging | ❌ FAIL |
The build was passing through `5a90cde`, then **`4e101db` is the first commit where the test fails**. This commit removed validation logic that was previously added, which broke the build. The subsequent commit (`940e58d`) also fails because it inherits the broken state.
2cdb1ac
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2cdb1ac"}
08ab55f
890462d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"890462d"}
**Bad commit: `93e4ae3`** ("remove validation logic")
This is the first commit where the tests change from PASS to FAIL. The previous commit (`de939f9`) passed, and `93e4ae3` introduced the failure by removing validation logic. The subsequent commit (`1f95a26`) also fails, but only because it builds on top of the already-broken state.
2488959
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2488959"}
The bad commit is **403ac6c** (`remove validation logic`). This is the first commit where the tests start failing, meaning it introduced the bug by removing necessary validation logic.
2437eba
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2437eba"}
759777e
4f13522
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"4f13522"}
f0f7ef1
a7df9a0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a7df9a0"}
Looking at the test results, I need to find the first commit where the tests started failing:
- `b030e22` Initial commit: **PASS** ✓
- `413b119` add validation function: **PASS** ✓
- `ccddaec` remove validation logic: **FAIL** ✗ ← First failure
- `a6f60c8` add auth logging: **FAIL** ✗
The bad commit is **`ccddaec`** ("remove validation logic").
This commit removed validation logic that was added in the previous commit (`413b119`), which likely broke functionality that depended on that validation. The subsequent commit `a6f60c8` continues to fail because the underlying issue from `ccddaec` was never fixed.
e0c1b00
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e0c1b00"}
2c1fa36
abe261a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"abe261a"}
be53e35
6eb919b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6eb919b"}
8e54e7b
b7be247
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b7be247"}
**Bad commit: `025084e`** ("remove validation logic")
**Reasoning:**
- `2c7c225` (Initial commit): PASS
- `08d9ec7` (add validation function): PASS
- `025084e` (remove validation logic): **FAIL** ← first failure
- `5b8bb89` (add auth logging): FAIL (inherits the broken state)
The build first breaks at commit `025084e`. Its parent (`08d9ec7`) passes, so this is the commit that introduced the bug. Removing the validation logic broke the build, and the subsequent commit `5b8bb89` continues to fail simply because the bug was never fixed.
ca63556
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ca63556"}
4d54b46
2306e3e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2306e3e"}
**Bad commit: `3f9ebd2` — "remove validation logic"**
## Reasoning
Looking at the test results in chronological order (oldest first), I can identify the exact transition point where the build broke:
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| `8c98f63` | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| `f8db875` | add validation function | ✅ PASS |
| **`3f9ebd2`** | **remove validation logic** | ❌ **FAIL** ← first failure |
| `ff547b2` | add auth logging | ❌ FAIL |
**Key observations:**
1. **The last passing commit is `f8db875`** ("add validation function").
2. **The first failing commit is `3f9ebd2`** ("remove validation logic"). This is the transition point—the bug was introduced here.
3. **`ff547b2`** ("add auth logging") also fails, but only because it *inherits* the broken state from `3f9ebd2`. It is not the culprit itself.
**Why this makes sense:** The commit immediately before (`f8db875`) *added* a validation function, and the codebase presumably depends on it. The bad commit `3f9ebd2` then *removed* that validation logic, breaking whatever code relied on it—hence the build failure.
This is essentially the logic a `git bisect` would follow: find the boundary where PASS flips to FAIL. That boundary is **`3f9ebd2`**.
93e5d17
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "93e5d17"}
The bad commit is **3ed1c69** ("remove validation logic").
**Reasoning:**
- `aaf8564` (Initial commit): PASS
- `dca3d75` (add validation function): PASS
- `3ed1c69` (remove validation logic): **FAIL** ← first failure
- `922abf0` (add auth logging): FAIL (still broken, inherited from previous)
The build transitions from PASS to FAIL at commit `3ed1c69`. Removing the validation logic broke the build, and the subsequent commit `922abf0` simply inherited the already-broken state. Therefore, `3ed1c69` is the commit that introduced the bug.
c187b8b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c187b8b"}
Based on the test results, the build first started failing at commit `d291b7a` ("remove validation logic"). The previous commit `cbd4129` passed, and this is where the failure was introduced.
**Answer: `d291b7a`** ("remove validation logic")
This commit removed validation logic that the build/tests depended on, causing all subsequent commits (including `aa3dd7d`) to also fail.
3546d03
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "3546d03"}
The bad commit is:
**663d689** — "remove validation logic"
**Reasoning:**
Looking at the test results in chronological order (oldest first):
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| 9dbf1b2 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 256f2f0 | add validation function | ✅ PASS |
| 663d689 | remove validation logic | ❌ FAIL |
| 73efd47 | add auth logging | ❌ FAIL |
The build transitions from **PASS → FAIL** at commit `663d689`. Every commit before it passes, and every commit from it onward fails. This makes `663d689` the commit that introduced the bug.
The subject line ("remove validation logic") is also a strong clue — it removed logic that a subsequent step (or the tests themselves) depended on. The later commit `73efd47` still fails simply because it inherits the broken state; it isn't the root cause.
**Answer: `663d689` (remove validation logic)**
c02ba6d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c02ba6d"}
Looking at the test results:
- `e2753be` Initial commit: **PASS**
- `b334814` add validation function: **PASS**
- `40e9d53` remove validation logic: **FAIL**
- `ed11d16` add auth logging: **FAIL**
The first failure appears at commit `40e9d53`. The subject line "remove validation logic" confirms this — it removed logic that was necessary for the build/tests to pass.
**Bad commit: `40e9d53`**
8e5de67
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8e5de67"}
23c05b9
8c76e27
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8c76e27"}
## Analysis
Looking at the test results chronologically:
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| 3cbd1d0 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 08559b0 | add validation function | ✅ PASS |
| **79b69f6** | **remove validation logic** | ❌ FAIL |
| b2777cc | add auth logging | ❌ FAIL |
The build was passing through `08559b0`, then failed starting at `79b69f6` and continued failing in all subsequent commits.
## Bad Commit
**`79b69f6`** — *"remove validation logic"*
This commit removed validation logic that the codebase depended on. The subject line itself is a strong indicator — removing logic that was previously added (and relied upon) broke the build. All commits after this one also fail, confirming this is the root cause.
61faf08
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"61faf08"}
4a2c3da
c8e4d31
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c8e4d31"}
## Analysis
Looking at the test results from oldest to newest:
- `893f481` Initial commit: **PASS**
- `c9cc64d` add validation function: **PASS**
- `7901938` remove validation logic: **FAIL** ← First failure
- `35d9695` add auth logging: **FAIL**
The first failing commit is `7901938`. The commit subject "remove validation logic" confirms that necessary validation logic was deleted, which broke the build. All subsequent commits also fail, indicating this is the root cause.
## Answer
**`7901938`**
5737c28
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5737c28"}
The bad commit is **a73fabe**
**Reasoning:** The test results show a clear transition from PASS to FAIL at commit `a73fabe` ("remove validation logic"). The initial commit and the "add validation function" commit both pass, but starting with `a73fabe` the build breaks — and the subsequent commit `d2a2d96` continues to fail (inheriting the broken state). The subject line "remove validation logic" also directly hints that necessary validation was deleted, causing the failure.
dfe65aa
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"dfe65aa"}
**62780b8** - "remove validation logic"
This is the first commit where tests failed (exit code 1), immediately after the last passing commit (daac878). Since the failure persists in the next commit (032bd4f) but the transition from PASS to FAIL occurred at 62780b8, this is the commit that introduced the bug.
28127b0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"28127b0"}
0aae04c remove validation logic
ca8d98c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ca8d98c"}
**8aaca0c - "remove validation logic"**
This is the first commit where tests fail (exit code 1), immediately following the last passing commit (a902303). Since git bisect logic points to the earliest commit where the failure appears, and the test results transition from PASS to FAIL at this commit, "remove validation logic" introduced the breaking change. The subsequent commit (b7600c2) continues to fail simply because the bug was never fixed, not because it introduced a new issue.
b63daeb
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b63daeb"}
**79112ae - "remove validation logic"**
This is the first commit where tests fail (exit code 1), immediately following a passing commit (a3e710d). Since the failure persists in the next commit (731e5b9) but the transition from PASS to FAIL happens exactly at 79112ae, this is the commit that introduced the bug — likely by removing validation logic that other code depends on.
d1a15f8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d1a15f8"}
**79ea45b** - "remove validation logic"
This commit introduced the bug. The test results show a clear transition from PASS to FAIL at this commit:
- `33d8e1f` (Initial commit): PASS
- `8d38925` (add validation function): PASS
- `79ea45b` (remove validation logic): **FAIL** ← bug introduced here
- `4d6537a` (add auth logging): FAIL (still broken, inherited from parent)
Since the build was passing after "add validation function" and failed immediately after "remove validation logic," this commit is responsible for breaking the build. The subsequent commit (`4d6537a`) continues to fail simply because it was built on top of the already-broken code, not because it introduced a new issue.
37a4ddf remove validation logic
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "37a4ddf remove validation logic"}
The bad commit is the one that first caused the test to fail, which is `77eee16` (remove validation logic). This is evident because the test passed on all commits before it and failed on this commit and all subsequent commits.
**Answer:** 77eee16
The first commit that caused a test failure is `67b7210` with the subject "remove validation logic". This indicates that the bug was introduced when the validation logic was removed.
Answer: 67b7210
The bad commit is `1e245d6` (subject line: "remove validation logic"). This is the first commit where the tests fail, indicating the bug was introduced here.
de15c5a
f8f0ccb
The test results show that the commit `f8f0ccb` (remove validation logic) is the first one to fail (exit code 1), while the subsequent commit `def5482` (add auth logging) also fails. Since the bug was introduced by the first failing commit, `f8f0ccb` is the bad commit.
c1bcfe0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "c1bcfe0"
}
5767663
b0a3e86
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "b0a3e86"
}
35b8515
The bad commit is **35b8515** ("remove validation logic").
**Reasoning:**
- The initial commit (`c9bb08f`) and the commit adding validation (`7638190`) both passed tests.
- The commit removing validation logic (`35b8515`) caused the build to fail (`FAIL`).
- The subsequent commit adding auth logging (`9cb0dc7`) also failed, but this is a consequence of the broken state introduced by `35b8515`.
- Since only one commit is identified as bad, the root cause is the removal of validation logic.
**Answer:** `35b8515`
33f283a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "33f283a"
}
cd729b4
**Reasoning:**
1. **Test Results Order:** The test results are listed from oldest commit to newest. The first failing commit is `cd729b4` ("remove validation logic") with exit code 1.
2. **Build Breakage:** The user states there is one bad commit that broke the build. The first commit to fail tests is `cd729b4`.
3. **Subsequent Failure:** The commit `0d44c2f` ("add auth logging") also fails, but this happens *after* the build was already broken by `cd729b4`. The failure of `0d44c2f` is likely a consequence of the existing bug introduced by `cd729b4`, not the original cause.
4. **Conclusion:** The commit that introduced the bug causing the build to break is `cd729b4`. The first 7 characters of its hash are `cd729b4`.
8ac564a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "8ac564a"
}
c3c3da2
3896182
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "3896182" }
f2656ee
96a8b9d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "96a8b9d" }
fd032b4
9e84592
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "9e84592"
}
1cdaf51
730b0ae
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "730b0ae"
}
556748e
4500699
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4500699"}
65f6416
66164ac
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "66164ac"
}
baf30d8
934332b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "934332b"
}
824a8b0
bb2312e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "bb2312e"}
e3197b6
97f1d45
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "97f1d45" }
Based on the git history and test results, the bad commit is the one that first introduced the failure. Looking at the test results chronologically (oldest first):
- `0d2d4ee` - PASS
- `d884cb1` - PASS
- `b289d10` - FAIL (first failure)
- `1fd1669` - FAIL (still failing)
The commit `b289d10` is the first commit that fails the build, as indicated by "FAIL (exit code 1)" in the test results. The subsequent commit `1fd1669` continues to fail because it builds on top of the broken commit.
b289d10
4853718
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "4853718" }
795ad7f
0bb1621
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"0bb1621"}
c30188e
be1cc7e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "be1cc7e"}
Based on the test results, the first commit that failed was `6449ba6` with the subject line "remove validation logic". This commit introduced the bug that caused the build to break, and all subsequent commits (including `209a377`) continued to fail.
**Bad commit:** 6449ba6
94d9ae3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"94d9ae3"}
8bde75d
af90c7c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "af90c7c"}
Based on the test results, the bad commit is:
**1ea382c** (or "remove validation logic")
This is the first commit where the tests fail (exit code 1). The previous two commits passed, and since the failure first appears at "remove validation logic" and persists to the next commit, this is the commit that introduced the bug.
108a641
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "108a641"}
ea4f88b
c0313bc
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c0313bc"}
99cbfe5
a9f6401
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "a9f6401"}
The bad commit is **08f9c3a** (or **remove validation logic**).
Here is the breakdown of the test results:
1. **86a9a12** (Initial commit): **PASS**
2. **76a16cc** (add validation function): **PASS**
3. **08f9c3a** (remove validation logic): **FAIL** — This is the first commit where the failure occurs.
4. **ac96524** (add auth logging): **FAIL** — The bug persists from the previous commit.
302acde
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"302acde"}
504c8e6
7bbaff4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7bbaff4"}
ae7cea1
f1bff8c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f1bff8c"}
The bad commit is **5744cd0** (or "remove validation logic").
**Reasoning:**
The commit `7b8253b` passed all tests, but the subsequent commit `5744cd0` caused the build to fail. This indicates that `5744cd0` introduced the breaking change.
0edb778
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "0edb778"
}
The bad commit is **521c1d1**.
**Reasoning:**
* `0abfba0` ("add validation function") passed the tests.
* `521c1d1` ("remove validation logic") caused the tests to fail.
* Therefore, the break was introduced in `521c1d1`.
dc067b7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "dc067b7"}
The bad commit is **fa3feb9** (remove validation logic).
9adedbf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "9adedbf"
}
The bad commit is **af34f16** (remove validation logic).
1d092f2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1d092f2"}
0ad3a49
464d805
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"464d805"}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **a27d983** (or the subject line "**remove validation logic**").
Based on the test output, the build passes on `099887e` and `01254dd`, but begins failing with exit code 1 immediately at `a27d983`.
8882a40
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "8882a40"
}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **2d6fd84** (or "remove validation logic").
Based on the test results, the build was passing until this commit was introduced, causing it and all subsequent commits (like `9e039d4`) to fail with exit code 1.
e8edc28
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "e8edc28"}
3e77990
7ac04f4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "7ac04f4"}
c3c5379
669f324
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"669f324"}
abe05a7
c02667c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "c02667c"
}
362e545
eea9582
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "eea9582"}
7c20dcb
5a3f971
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "5a3f971"}
1c5ae61
06fdef5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"06fdef5"}
dfdbf8a
cfa1c45
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "cfa1c45"
}
`ef5deda`
111c7e9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "111c7e9"}
2ad3a87
efee54c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"efee54c"}
b88e656
2e7f3cd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "2e7f3cd"}
The bad commit that broke the build is **1732872** (or "remove validation logic").
4602610
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"4602610"}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **46e67a1** (or "remove validation logic").
c091bda
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "c091bda"
}
2ac78c6
e03755c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e03755c"}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **`5b40b60`** (remove validation logic).
cff6421
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"cff6421"}
`b911c9f`
b8350b8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b8350b8"}
6a75279
32cafc3
4650d5d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "4650d5d"
}
0e4a651
be655ca
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "be655ca"
}
7e9f320
bee7159
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "bee7159"
}
991867f
4527098
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4527098"}
346287b
14b4d36
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "14b4d36"}
95ba8a8
4421597
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4421597"}
2b71d8a
15d962b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "15d962b"}
a037ca0
5719327
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "5719327"}
d91c2d4
740ea4d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"740ea4d"}
The test results indicate that the commit `04ab924` ("remove validation logic") caused the build to fail, with an exit code of 1. Since it is the first failing commit in the test results (which are listed from oldest to newest), it is the commit that introduced the bug.
**Answer:** `04ab924`
d348a34
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "d348a34" }
We need to identify the first bad commit using the provided test results.
Commit history from newest to oldest:
1. a786b25 add auth logging (FAIL)
2. 32633ba remove validation logic (FAIL)
3. 81b8281 add validation function (PASS)
4. 5b8b111 Initial commit (PASS)
Tests run from oldest to newest:
- 5b8b111: PASS
- 81b8281: PASS
- 32633ba: FAIL
- a786b25: FAIL
The first failure occurs at commit 32633ba ("remove validation logic"), which broke the build. The commit after it (a786b25) also fails, but that's a secondary failure caused by the initial breakage.
The answer is the commit that first introduced the bug.
32633ba
55b956d remove validation logic
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"55b956d remove validation logic"}
The bad commit is **907d227**, as it is the only commit with a failure (`FAIL` exit code).
**Answer:** `907d227`
3cab866
b01bc14
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "b01bc14" }
85fd497 (remove validation logic)
39563b1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "39563b1"
}
994dcf9
657fef9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "657fef9"
}
27e8a8d (remove validation logic)
9400e17
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "9400e17"
}
958b887
f110a80
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f110a80"}
**3b8a680** (remove validation logic) – this is the first commit that introduced the bug, causing the tests to fail.
c125dff
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c125dff"}
90c0290 (remove validation logic)
98842d8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"98842d8"}
**52e2fa3** – “remove validation logic” introduced the bug. It’s the first commit where the tests start failing.
3ed3c93
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"3ed3c93"}
The bad commit is **bed2d51** (remove validation logic).
This is the first commit in the history (oldest first) where the tests went from PASS to FAIL. Removing the validation logic broke the build, and the subsequent commit (c103a36 add auth logging) also fails because it was built on top of the already-broken state.
139bcf0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "139bcf0"}
fba759e
eafff5b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "eafff5b"}
The bad commit is **e4f75a2** ("remove validation logic").
This is the first commit where the tests transitioned from PASS to FAIL. The subsequent commit `addc32c` also fails, but that's a consequence of the build already being broken by removing the validation logic.
8311916
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "8311916" }
**498abba** (remove validation logic)
This is the first commit where the tests changed from PASS to FAIL. The prior commit (`e17ddc7` add validation function) passed, and removing the validation logic broke the build. The subsequent commit (`5001910`) remains broken only because it inherited the bug from `498abba`.
0628a69
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "0628a69" }
Based on the test results, the build was working fine until commit `105953f remove validation logic`, which introduced the failure. The subsequent commit `8bc94d7 add auth logging` also failed, but the first failure occurred at `105953f`.
Therefore, the bad commit is:
`105953f` (or the subject line "remove validation logic").
e5fb43d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "e5fb43d"}
66fe51f
22f03ce
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "22f03ce"}
da39a8a
c90327e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c90327e"}
The bad commit is the first one that introduced a test failure. The test results show that `9800eba` passed, but `1839fe6` failed, meaning `1839fe6` is the commit that broke the build.
The commit hash (first 7 characters) is **1839fe6**. Alternatively, the subject line is **"remove validation logic"**.
1839fe6
54aa559
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "54aa559"}
The bad commit is **f7121a2**. This is the first commit in the history (when going from oldest to newest) where the test fails. Since the commit right before it (`78a4579`) passed, but `f7121a2` failed, this means the bug was introduced by the "remove validation logic" commit. All subsequent commits (like `ec19f88`) continue to fail because they include the bad change from `f7121a2`.
So the answer is: **f7121a2**
c0a896c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c0a896c"}
5465f86
421dea1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "421dea1"}
9b72c75
0190d5c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw)
{
"commit": "0190d5c"
}
c9a05ea
c5f3cc4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw)
{
"commit": "c5f3cc4"
}
8f5afee
4902d55
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw)
{
"commit": "4902d55"
}
91b2d67
757e966
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "757e966"
}
5d3f46a
086d540
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "086d540" }
4365227 (remove validation logic)
6683566
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "6683566" }
d35d69d
022f3bb
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw)
{
"commit": "022f3bb"
}
eaa03ec
**Bad commit: `9b3be7e` — "remove validation logic"**
**Reasoning:**
- `e5da634` (Initial commit): PASS
- `e7c2fb0` (add validation function): PASS — last known good commit
- `9b3be7e` (remove validation logic): **FAIL** — first commit where the build breaks
- `af31db8` (add auth logging): FAIL — still broken, inherited from the previous commit
Since the build passed at `e7c2fb0` and first failed at `9b3be7e`, the bug was introduced in `9b3be7e`. This is confirmed by the commit subject itself: it *removed* the validation logic that was added in the prior commit, which broke the build.
**Bad commit: `74ebb8d` — "remove validation logic"**
**Reasoning:**
Working from oldest to newest, the test results show:
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| 1bda779 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 5c32253 | add validation function | ✅ PASS |
| **74ebb8d** | **remove validation logic** | ❌ **FAIL** ← first failure |
| 4db26b2 | add auth logging | ❌ FAIL |
The build passes through `5c32253` and first fails at `74ebb8d`. Since `4db26b2` (add auth logging) comes *after* the failure began, it inherited the broken state rather than causing it. The bad commit is the **first** one where the test transitions from PASS to FAIL: **`74ebb8d`**, which removed the validation logic that the build depends on.
**Bad commit: `ff1e7af` — "remove validation logic"**
**Reasoning:**
- Working backward from the test results, the transition from PASS → FAIL happens between `7eb923a` (PASS) and `ff1e7af` (FAIL).
- Since `7eb923a` still passed and `ff1e7af` is the first commit that fails, the bug was introduced in `ff1e7af`.
- The later commit `a250638` (add auth logging) also fails, but it only *inherited* the broken state — it didn't introduce the bug.
- This is consistent with the commit subjects: the bug was introduced when the validation logic was removed, which is exactly the kind of change that would break a build depending on that validation.
e17e7af
**Bad commit: `c877d3c` — "remove validation logic"**
Reasoning:
- `8548da4` (Initial commit): PASS
- `455911a` (add validation function): PASS
- `c877d3c` (remove validation logic): **FAIL** ← first failure
- `33fbb89` (add auth logging): FAIL (inherits the bug)
Since `455911a` passes and `c877d3c` is the first commit where the build fails, the bug was introduced in **`c877d3c`** ("remove validation logic"). The later commit `33fbb89` only fails because it contains the broken code from `c877d3c`.
**Bad commit: `528d68f` — "remove validation logic"**
**Reasoning:**
- `dd19741` (Initial commit): PASS
- `0628133` (add validation function): PASS
- `528d68f` (remove validation logic): **FAIL** ← first failing commit
- `d714ac1` (add auth logging): FAIL (still broken, but it inherited the failure)
Since the build passed at `0628133` and first failed at `528d68f`, commit `528d68f` is the one that introduced the bug — fittingly, it removed the validation logic that the tests depend on. The later commit `d714ac1` only added logging and didn't cause the failure.
**Bad commit: `2056f51` — "remove validation logic"**
**Reasoning:**
Walking through the history chronologically (oldest first):
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| d8259e0 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 6167e5f | add validation function | ✅ PASS |
| **2056f51** | **remove validation logic** | ❌ **FAIL** |
| 5a0b333 | add auth logging | ❌ FAIL |
The tests pass at `6167e5f` and first fail at `2056f51`, so `2056f51` is the commit that introduced the bug. The newest commit `5a0b333` ("add auth logging") also fails, but that's because it *inherited* the broken state — it merely added logging on top of the already-broken code.
The subject line also corroborates this: the validation function was added in `6167e5f` (tests pass), then the validation logic was *removed* in `2056f51`, which immediately breaks the build. A bisect would converge on `2056f51` as the first bad commit.
**Bad commit: `4b357c2` — "remove validation logic"**
**Reasoning:**
- `4836ec0` (Initial commit) → PASS
- `c1a3041` (add validation function) → PASS
- `4b357c2` (remove validation logic) → **FAIL** ← first failure
- `664a408` (add auth logging) → FAIL (still broken, but not the cause)
The build transitions from PASS to FAIL at commit `4b357c2`. The subsequent commit `664a408` also fails, but that's because it inherits the broken state — it didn't introduce the bug. The commit subject also hints at the problem: removing validation logic likely broke functionality that tests depend on.
To fix: `git revert 4b357c2` or restore the validation logic removed in that commit.
**7b00989** (remove validation logic)
The first failing commit is `7b00989`. The previous commits (`dea0b20` and `cfa3d61`) both pass, so the bug was introduced when the validation logic was removed. The subsequent commit `4ade623` also fails, but it inherited the broken state rather than causing it.
0a6976b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"0a6976b"}
**b173a8b** – the commit that removed validation logic introduced the failure.
d22407e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d22407e" }
`9b2a36e`
e1156f9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "e1156f9" }
**13863cb** (commit subject: *“remove validation logic”*)
5cb7cab
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "5cb7cab"
}
16a26ac remove validation logic
e53257f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "e53257f"
}
848688c
54a261f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "54a261f" }
a7657a9
891b185
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "891b185"
}
2dc905f
086756a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "086756a"
}
ac60add
5cfc24f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "5cfc24f"
}
Based on the test results and commit history (oldest to newest):
- **7243370 Initial commit**: PASS
- **d03cd12 add validation function**: PASS
- **0b78c32 remove validation logic**: FAIL
- **dd85941 add auth logging**: FAIL
The first failing commit is **0b78c32 remove validation logic**. Since the prior commit (`d03cd12`) passed, and this one failed, the bug was introduced in this commit.
The test continues to fail in the next commit (`dd85941`), which is expected because it builds on the broken state.
### Answer:
**0b78c32** (first 7 characters of the bad commit hash)
or equivalently:
**remove validation logic** (the commit subject line)
Both are acceptable per the instructions.
**Final Answer: 0b78c32**
dc87502
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "dc87502"
}
fba7b4c
c68adf2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c68adf2"}
e6d04b5
aa630e3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"aa630e3"}
f3460a0
b5798d5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b5798d5"}
6454b14
7db3f57
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7db3f57"}
01f638d
f23dc2f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f23dc2f"}
88a4ee1
6f2373b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6f2373b"}
66e9815
7cab590
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7cab590"}
867498e
e9a451f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e9a451f"}
cff4318 remove validation logic
eb2075c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"eb2075c"}
6e541ca
8278b82
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8278b82"}
aa83ee4
bef441e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"bef441e"}
c67c76c
e32a0d8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e32a0d8"}
505c3a2
9cb7203
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"9cb7203"}
398ac8a
2c64324
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2c64324"}
d3eb4fd
02c4df2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"02c4df2"}
a273261
b02d331
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b02d331"}
288987b
e5d8e7d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e5d8e7d"}
7b322be
324befd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"324befd"}
695687b
0e26adf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"0e26adf"}
7acec3a
951513b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"951513b"}
8ba674b
3db7013
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"3db7013"}
da8f6bd
6775b81
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6775b81"}
257303f
f70696e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f70696e"}
b2c3b98 (remove validation logic)
7c35681
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7c35681"}
6a414d3
5b393e0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5b393e0"}
1b33608
a4c3e81
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a4c3e81"}
2a9d248
ae488ea
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ae488ea"}
9e1dce7
20dd6ba
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"20dd6ba"}
4df6065
f36dd9d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f36dd9d"}
4f1705b
bf4d61e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"bf4d61e"}
1cdef00
21a76bc
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"21a76bc"}
1af0adc
a5e7a47
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a5e7a47"}
41fead0
ca4d18a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ca4d18a"}
5011934 remove validation logic
d71e0bf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d71e0bf"}
e046710
b509a64
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b509a64"}
b9ef727
a3955f7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a3955f7"}
02978af
181a502
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"181a502"}
1df4f5e
7e1b983
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7e1b983"}
c283169
6958e46
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6958e46"}
c077e83 – remove validation logic
6b6f397
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "6b6f397" }
db34d30 (remove validation logic)
7739fc9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "7739fc9" }
**Bad commit:** `9116f48` — *remove validation logic*
8a6de12
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "8a6de12" }
02cfc07
21e6af5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "21e6af5" }
The failing commit that introduced the bug is **7fd3032** – the “remove validation logic” commit.
774bb87
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit":"774bb87" }
04380dc
de26f18
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "de26f18" }
dc3dcb8
670964b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "670964b" }
b91f065 (remove validation logic)
cf05d94
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"cf05d94"}
The bad commit is **766b1d3**. This commit removes validation logic, which directly precedes the first test failure in the sequence. The subsequent commit (54f5142) also fails, but the root cause originates from the removal of validation in 766b1d3.
9688ace
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "9688ace"}
c1012c5
61b7b98
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"61b7b98"}
0aa68a5
91b1d72
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "91b1d72"}
Based on the git log and test results, I can see that:
1. The initial commit (ae49dc7) passed all tests
2. The commit "add validation function" (cb5957a) also passed
3. The commit "remove validation logic" (1d177d6) failed the tests
4. The most recent commit "add auth logging" (2072967) also failed
Since both commits after cb5957a are failing, and the commit "remove validation logic" (1d177d6) directly follows the passing commit "add validation function" (cb5957a), the bad commit that introduced the bug is most likely the one that removed the validation logic.
**Answer: 1d177d6** (or "remove validation logic")
8169ac2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "8169ac2"}
10183f5
1bacfef
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "1bacfef"}
c46392a
6ec71d0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "6ec71d0"}
The bad commit is identified by analyzing the test results. The initial commit (25bcec8) and the commit adding validation (1e3a7c1) both pass. The next commit (3d32bfe) removes validation logic and causes the test to fail. Since this is the first failure in the sequence, it indicates that this commit introduced the bug. The subsequent commit (6c2b529) also fails but is not the root cause.
**Answer:** 3d32bfe
cf40ce9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "cf40ce9"}
The bad commit is **c90f6ce** ("remove validation logic").
**Reasoning:**
1. The initial commit and `11be7b5` ("add validation function") both passed tests.
2. `c90f6ce` ("remove validation logic") is the first commit to cause a test failure (exit code 1).
3. Subsequent commits (e.g., `23ea7fa`) inherited the broken state but were not the original cause.
The first failing commit after passing tests is the root cause.
**Answer:**
c90f6ce
d991cd6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d991cd6"}
2871b72
b469e85
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "b469e85"}
The bad commit is **6a6e8b9**.
Here's the breakdown:
- The test passed after `d27c818` (Initial commit) and `63692ce` (add validation function).
- The test **first failed** at `6a6e8b9` (remove validation logic), indicating this commit introduced the breaking change.
- Subsequent commits like `0b962ee` (add auth logging) also failed, but they are built on top of the broken state caused by `6a6e8b9`.
The root cause is the removal of validation logic, which likely broke the build.
**Answer:** 6a6e8b9
fefa8b2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "fefa8b2"
}
Looking at the test results chronologically:
1. **583fcc4 Initial commit**: PASS
2. **4b38e52 add validation function**: PASS
3. **c2f36d6 remove validation logic**: FAIL ← Tests start failing here
4. **214c7e1 add auth logging**: FAIL
The build was passing after commit `4b38e52`, but failed after `c2f36d6`. This indicates that commit `c2f36d6` (subject: "remove validation logic") introduced the bug by removing validation logic that was needed for the build to pass.
**Bad commit: c2f36d6**
dcf9dae
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "dcf9dae"
}
Looking at the test results chronologically:
1. `5336ddf Initial commit`: PASS
2. `105cbaf add validation function`: PASS
3. `ffd08e0 remove validation logic`: FAIL ← **First failure**
4. `bad1f6f add auth logging`: FAIL
The bug was introduced by commit `ffd08e0` titled "remove validation logic" - this is the first commit where tests started failing.
**Answer: ffd08e0**
c3f6d36
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c3f6d36"}
Based on the test results, I can see that the build was passing up until commit `8f84abc`, but then failed starting with commit `979bc16`.
The commit that introduced the bug is:
**979bc16** (remove validation logic)
cbad9e4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "cbad9e4"}
Looking at the test results, I can see that:
- Commit `7d40527` (Initial commit): PASS
- Commit `4ccd4ff` (add validation function): PASS
- Commit `6b9929e` (remove validation logic): FAIL
- Commit `52a5ab7` (add auth logging): FAIL
The build passed up to commit `4ccd4ff` but failed starting with commit `6b9929e`. This commit message "remove validation logic" suggests it removed important validation that was causing the build to fail. Even though commit `52a5ab7` also fails, it was built on top of the already broken state from `6b9929e`.
The bad commit is: **6b9929e**
4853718
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4853718"}
Based on the test results, I can see that:
1. Commit `799b1aa` (Initial commit): **PASS**
2. Commit `4d2e397` (add validation function): **PASS**
3. Commit `5e5c724` (remove validation logic): **FAIL**
4. Commit `0ad51a8` (add auth logging): **FAIL**
The tests were passing up until commit `4d2e397`, but then failed starting with commit `5e5c724`. This indicates that commit `5e5c724` ("remove validation logic") introduced the bug by removing the validation logic that was working correctly before.
**Bad commit: 5e5c724**
04df12b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "04df12b"}
9840d10
4335783
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "4335783"
}
f490cf8
bd825a9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "bd825a9" }
662e0bf
36069cd
1e5b792
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "1e5b792"
}
57328c5
bcc4ca9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "bcc4ca9"
}
5cd6807
9103b25
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "9103b25"
}
16de611
28b832d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "28b832d" }
be06ffb
9d90f47
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9d90f47" }
7b9f749
a909ed2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "a909ed2"
}
a99ceb1
d93bfe1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d93bfe1"
}
4ccab0e (remove validation logic)
0e22ed8
88038c6
5083ed3
c5402f6
7060b47
85b45fb
e275623
e7cf5cb
564e9ca
90dcf6d
9ab0c31
The bad commit is **cc66250** ("remove validation logic").
**Reasoning:** Looking at the test results chronologically, the build was passing through commit `264abc7` (add validation function) and first failed at commit `cc66250` (remove validation logic). This is where the transition from PASS → FAIL occurs, indicating that removing the validation logic is what broke the build. The subsequent commit `0577e0a` (add auth logging) continues to fail because it's built on top of the already-broken commit.
f1cac5e
7120e0f
The bad commit is **776cb08** ("remove validation logic").
The test results show that the build was passing through commit `7839f6f` (add validation function) and first failed at commit `776cb08` (remove validation logic). This is where the regression was introduced — likely by removing validation that the build/tests depended on. The subsequent commit `966cdaa` continues to fail because the bug from `776cb08` was never fixed.
05f9f7f
The bad commit is **7890573** (`remove validation logic`).
**Reasoning:** Looking at the test results chronologically:
1. `1b7f144` Initial commit → **PASS** ✅
2. `3726d52` add validation function → **PASS** ✅
3. `7890573` remove validation logic → **FAIL** ❌
4. `f1cce82` add auth logging → **FAIL** ❌
The first transition from PASS to FAIL occurs at commit `7890573`. This is where the validation logic was removed, which broke the build. All subsequent commits (including `f1cce82`) also fail because they build on top of this broken state.
The bad commit is **6876502** ("remove validation logic").
**Reasoning:**
- `b04bd7e` → PASS ✅
- `98c5265` → PASS ✅
- `6876502` → FAIL ❌ ← bug introduced here
- `7e07bc7` → FAIL ❌ (inherits the bug)
The first failing commit is `6876502`, where the validation logic was removed, which broke the build. The previous commit `98c5265` was the last known good commit.
3ca0d8b
## Identifying the Bad Commit
Looking at the test results chronologically (oldest to newest):
| Commit | Subject | Test Result |
|--------|---------|-------------|
| `4c2c1c6` | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| `f841543` | add validation function | ✅ PASS |
| `bf1e41e` | remove validation logic | ❌ FAIL |
| `0cb23aa` | add auth logging | ❌ FAIL |
### Analysis
- `f841543` is the **last good** commit (PASS).
- `bf1e41e` is the **first bad** commit (FAIL).
The build broke when validation logic was removed before it was still being relied upon. This is a textbook "bisect" result — the first failing commit is the one that introduced the regression.
### Bad Commit: **`bf1e41e`** (`remove validation logic`)
6ce510a
547341f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "547341f" }
60479b0 (remove validation logic)
7427ddd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "7427ddd"}
db456c5
9a184de
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9a184de" }
29b2915
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "29b2915" }
623bd67
57c7f4f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "57c7f4f" }
99d9486
277cbb1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "277cbb1" }
dc6cd9b
e33a750
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "e33a750"}
9eb5b16
1f9bca9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "1f9bca9"}
4aa31e6
5d0559f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "5d0559f" }
e01963f
6084b4e
70d5ca4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "70d5ca4" }
The first failing commit is **b97c935** (`remove validation logic`).
- `db31322` PASS
- `f345083` PASS
- `b97c935` FAIL ← bug introduced here
- `e0bc21a` FAIL (inherits the break)
So the bad commit hash is `b97c935`.
f82a43a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "f82a43a"
}
0460c98
d49ab91
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d49ab91"}
eb30a4f
69e38c4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "69e38c4" }
b19c31d
0ed61d1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "0ed61d1"}
4aa0229
072c525
21b0751
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "21b0751"}
cbe0f39
4f7d059
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"4f7d059"}
The test results show that the build passes on the two oldest commits (25bcec8 and 1e3a7c1) but fails starting with 3d32bfe. This means the failure was introduced by the change in commit 3d32bfe (whose subject is "remove validation logic").
(The subsequent commit 6c2b529 also fails, but it did not introduce the regression.)
Final answer: 3d32bfe
843797b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"843797b"}
8326990
9265978
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "9265978"}
bee5c46
The test results show a clean pass on b7f308b followed by an immediate failure on bee5c46; that is therefore the first commit whose change (removal of validation logic) introduced the breakage. All later commits inherit the same failure, confirming the regression was introduced exactly at bee5c46.
6a328cd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6a328cd"}
f5c7698
57e3b1e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"57e3b1e"}
aafdc4a
794a745
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"794a745"}
abd2709
c74637d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c74637d"}
68b2ada
84899df
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "84899df"}
**b50d747**
The test results show that the build passed for the initial commit and for “add validation function”, but started failing at “remove validation logic” (and continued failing afterward). Therefore the commit that introduced the regression is b50d747.
d50d509
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d50d509"
}
7a3af09
b41ee58
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b41ee58"}
1d2b402
d5242d1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d5242d1"}
81e34b2
520fde0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "520fde0" }
ffebbcb
ae15bba
c51e561
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "c51e561" }
a9ad42c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "a9ad42c" }
fce481a
(remove validation logic)
17aa755
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "17aa755" }
4a19e10
59d0bf3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "59d0bf3" }
1090e18
f707da3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "f707da3" }
773c9d2
05cbd1e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "05cbd1e" }
ee31e06
aca467d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "aca467d" }
2968ea2
40708a3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "40708a3" }
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: 639713e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 7 (char 6)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 7 (char 6)
Invalid JSON. Output: The bad commit is **fc3ebe9**, because it is the only commit before the failing ones and its removal of validation logic caused the build to fail.
Answer: fc3ebe9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: Based on the test results provided, the build started failing at the commit that first showed a "FAIL" status.
1. **e75e803** (Initial commit): PASS
2. **4b63e69** (add validation function): PASS
3. **3e30f7a** (remove validation logic): **FAIL**
The transition from PASS to FAIL occurs at commit `3e30f7a`. Therefore, this is the commit that introduced the bug.
**3e30f7a** (or `remove validation logic`)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-c55036e4-8711-99e6-9e33-b48a400cfe94","request_id":"c55036e4-8711-99e6-9e33-b48a400cfe94"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-4e0cfe53-25b0-9095-a830-ea00f675626f","request_id":"4e0cfe53-25b0-9095-a830-ea00f675626f"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-0e288f8e-24ae-98d0-a5d7-d9039ce129bb","request_id":"0e288f8e-24ae-98d0-a5d7-d9039ce129bb"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-96d67025-1d26-9460-b581-5e3c6c7a1060","request_id":"96d67025-1d26-9460-b581-5e3c6c7a1060"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-9447895b-08eb-97d6-990d-872903454745","request_id":"9447895b-08eb-97d6-990d-872903454745"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-4ad70570-cc5f-9490-b47a-697fa70ef501"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-1ed0e781-8933-97eb-b4bf-b657926d1ef0"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-193b3925-e82e-9960-b09b-a13bbadd6713"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-9ae499dc-f401-919f-81f0-cef9c4b8579a"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-824c9b59-178e-90a4-8641-c25459bc168f"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-15e2e2ef-d9a0-9da2-87dc-012e9bb3c2c7"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-5b4269a5-3711-9da9-b005-9bcb2cf06da2","request_id":"5b4269a5-3711-9da9-b005-9bcb2cf06da2"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-09a92e29-d6b7-946a-8c71-6fa16f5f4f76","request_id":"09a92e29-d6b7-946a-8c71-6fa16f5f4f76"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-dc290ee2-a0ff-99bc-8dd5-18e4bc8bdf9b","request_id":"dc290ee2-a0ff-99bc-8dd5-18e4bc8bdf9b"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-ca6ae187-57df-9245-b574-65e8cfaa4517","request_id":"ca6ae187-57df-9245-b574-65e8cfaa4517"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-e7610c37-9f12-90d5-b8b2-2d32cd4b9ad6","request_id":"e7610c37-9f12-90d5-b8b2-2d32cd4b9ad6"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-3aed9398-9f10-9bfb-8237-8a364415bcb3","request_id":"3aed9398-9f10-9bfb-8237-8a364415bcb3"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-4d0f319a-e2f7-9bcc-9f22-230474c1c398","request_id":"4d0f319a-e2f7-9bcc-9f22-230474c1c398"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-7bd67f2d-fa7e-937e-9978-e20954a6722c","request_id":"7bd67f2d-fa7e-937e-9978-e20954a6722c"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-2f16aeb8-9418-9b38-996d-9446b19e41d2","request_id":"2f16aeb8-9418-9b38-996d-9446b19e41d2"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-dfb4156b-6b42-90b0-9d0f-0ab399a17780","request_id":"dfb4156b-6b42-90b0-9d0f-0ab399a17780"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
Failure: Model 'tencent/hy3:none' violated the reasoning_level=none invariant: provider reported 374 reasoning token(s)
Invalid JSON. Output: 6ce63f7{ "commit": "6ce63f7" }
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Invalid JSON. Output: 7273787{ "commit": "7273787" }
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 8 (char 7)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 8 (char 7)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
d9c2117 add auth logging
Failure: Expected target hash/prefix or subject 'remove validation logic'