Bad commit changes database.py and api.py - model identifies the multi-file bad commit
Tests ability to identify a multi-file bad commit (database.py + api.py) via bisect. Evaluates bisect for backend multi-file regressions.
Baseline Repository
These commands set up the repo before the model sees the prompt. They define the starting file structure, staged changes, and Git history.
- 01
git init - 02
git config user.email 'test@test.com' - 03
git config user.name 'Test User' - 04
echo '#!/bin/bash' > test.sh - 05
echo 'grep -q "localhost" src/database.py && grep -q "localhost" src/api.py' >> test.sh - 06
chmod +x test.sh - 07
mkdir -p src && echo 'DB_HOST = "localhost"' > src/database.py && echo 'API_BASE = "http://localhost:8000"' > src/api.py - 08
git add test.sh src/database.py src/api.py && git commit -m 'Initial commit' - 09
echo 'DB_POOL = 2' >> src/database.py - 10
git add src/database.py src/api.py && git commit -m 'configure localhost' - 11
echo 'DB_HOST = "production.db.com"' > src/database.py && echo 'API_BASE = "http://production.api.com"' > src/api.py - 12
git add src/database.py src/api.py && git commit -m 'switch to prod' - 13
echo 'DB_POOL = 5' >> src/database.py - 14
git add src/database.py && git commit -m 'add pool config' - 15
echo 'DB_PORT = 5432' >> src/database.py - 16
git add src/database.py && git commit -m 'add port config'
Prompt
You are debugging a git repository. The following commit history has one bad commit that broke the build. Identify the bad commit hash (first 7 characters) or commit subject line that introduced the bug. Use the git log and test output to determine which commit is bad.
Your answer should be the commit hash (e.g., 'abc1234') or the commit subject line.
Expected
switch to prod
Fixture Metrics
Scoped model quality, cost, API time, and token usage for git_bisect/f012.
Loading...
Raw Attempt Evidence
Loading raw attempt evidence…
Model Outputs (546)
**Bad commit: `633c991` — "switch to prod"**
The bisection logic:
- `f6daffd` (Initial commit): PASS ✅
- `97ac2f3` (configure localhost): PASS ✅
- `633c991` (switch to prod): **FAIL** ❌ ← first failing commit
- `caf90bc` and `87209de`: FAIL (inherited the breakage)
The build was passing through `97ac2f3` and first broke at `633c991`, so "switch to prod" is the commit that introduced the bug. All subsequent commits fail because they build on top of the broken change.
c548590
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c548590"}
The bad commit is **5fb4ef6** — "switch to prod". It's the first failing commit; all commits before it pass and all after it fail.
1131a17
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "1131a17"}
**Bad commit: `73cdd40` — "switch to prod"**
**Reasoning (bisect-style analysis):**
Walking through the test results in chronological order:
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| f5bae43 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 912d6b8 | configure localhost | ✅ PASS |
| **73cdd40** | **switch to prod** | ❌ **FAIL** ← first failure |
| 1e67185 | add pool config | ❌ FAIL |
| d823511 | add port config | ❌ FAIL |
The build was healthy through `912d6b8` and first broke at `73cdd40`. All subsequent commits fail because they're built on top of the broken commit. Therefore, the commit that introduced the bug is **`73cdd40` ("switch to prod")**.
467e08d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "467e08d"}
First failing commit: **bfb9d9e** — "switch to prod"
The tests pass through `3b16eb5 configure localhost` and start failing at `bfb9d9e switch to prod`, with all subsequent commits also failing. That makes `bfb9d9e` the bad commit.
55c4a90
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "55c4a90"}
**Bad commit: `5e36c8c` — "switch to prod"**
Reasoning (bisect logic):
- `54a71bb` (Initial commit): PASS ✅
- `2fe1414` (configure localhost): PASS ✅
- `5e36c8c` (switch to prod): **FAIL** ❌ ← first failing commit
- `367cc3e` (add pool config): FAIL (inherited breakage)
- `ece2bbf` (add port config): FAIL (inherited breakage)
The build transitions from passing to failing at `5e36c8c`, so "switch to prod" is the commit that introduced the bug. The subsequent failures are just downstream of that break.
202c79b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "202c79b"}
# Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
- ✅ 40ca31a Initial commit: PASS
- ✅ 6597f33 configure localhost: PASS
- ❌ ae4949f switch to prod: **FAIL** (first failure)
- ❌ ab4bc1c add pool config: FAIL
- ❌ d5f3464 add port config: FAIL
The build passes through commit `6597f33`, but fails starting at commit `ae4949f`. All subsequent commits also fail, indicating the bug was introduced in that commit and not fixed in later ones.
**Answer: ae4949f** (or "switch to prod")
fbfd59a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "fbfd59a"}
# Answer
**2e0683e** (or "switch to prod")
## Reasoning
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
- 6011266 Initial commit: **PASS** ✓
- 603cc6e configure localhost: **PASS** ✓
- 2e0683e switch to prod: **FAIL** ✗ ← First failure
- 5fc028f add pool config: FAIL ✗
- 7b4faa9 add port config: FAIL ✗
The last passing commit is `603cc6e`, and the first failing commit is `2e0683e`. This is the commit that introduced the bug and broke the build.
5476cd3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "5476cd3"}
# Analysis
Looking at the test results chronologically:
- ✅ ae52db2 Initial commit: **PASS**
- ✅ 806c56a configure localhost: **PASS**
- ❌ d75221f switch to prod: **FAIL** ← First failure
- ❌ 6e5cc01 add pool config: FAIL
- ❌ e72dff4 add port config: FAIL
The build was passing up to and including commit `806c56a`, then started failing at `d75221f`. All subsequent commits are also failing, which is consistent with the bad commit being introduced at `d75221f`.
**Answer: d75221f** (or "switch to prod")
ab7bbee
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ab7bbee"}
# Bad Commit Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
- **9d7b738** Initial commit: ✅ PASS
- **0f06927** configure localhost: ✅ PASS
- **3db3747** switch to prod: ❌ FAIL ← First failure
- **58acc6a** add pool config: ❌ FAIL
- **40a9de4** add port config: ❌ FAIL
The build was passing through commit `0f06927`, but started failing at commit `3db3747`. This is the first commit where the tests failed.
**Answer: `3db3747` or "switch to prod"**
f1f9469
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "f1f9469"}
# Bad Commit Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order:
- ✅ 6298224 Initial commit: **PASS**
- ✅ 5c07c49 configure localhost: **PASS**
- ❌ b660d0d switch to prod: **FAIL** ← First failure
- ❌ e7e9fd2 add pool config: FAIL
- ❌ c713932 add port config: FAIL
The tests pass through commit `5c07c49` but fail starting at `b660d0d`. This is the point where the build broke.
**Answer: b660d0d** (or "switch to prod")
c29a464
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c29a464"}
`4a11b8b`
d643cf9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d643cf9"}
a21a1a8
3214b0e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"3214b0e"}
**Bad commit: `18866b0`** ("switch to prod")
**Reasoning:** Using a bisect-style analysis of the test results:
| Commit | Result |
|--------|--------|
| `e33cb14` Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| `252de9d` configure localhost | ✅ PASS |
| **`18866b0` switch to prod** | **❌ FAIL** ← first failure |
| `db5fc75` add pool config | ❌ FAIL |
| `fd83e49` add port config | ❌ FAIL |
The build was passing through `252de9d`, and the first failure appeared at `18866b0` ("switch to prod"). All subsequent commits continue to fail, which is consistent with this commit introducing the breaking change. This is the classic pattern of a configuration switch (localhost → prod) breaking the build.
137ebbe
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"137ebbe"}
85e3b31
e98963b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e98963b"}
The bad commit is **579e9b9** ("switch to prod"), as it is the first commit where the tests begin to fail.
e427284
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e427284"}
The bad commit is `afb5f6e` ("switch to prod"). This is the first commit where the tests start failing, meaning it introduced the bug.
ab39253
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ab39253"}
e0fa272
572a0d6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"572a0d6"}
b8c593c
dae6fe1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"dae6fe1"}
Looking at the test results, I need to find the first commit where the tests started failing:
- `aace485` Initial commit: **PASS**
- `3d12a75` configure localhost: **PASS**
- `6afe067` switch to prod: **FAIL** ← First failure
- `26439ad` add pool config: FAIL
- `f900c28` add port config: FAIL
The bad commit is **`6afe067`** ("switch to prod"). This is the first commit where the build broke, and all subsequent commits inherit the failure. The switch from localhost (which was passing) to prod configuration introduced the bug.
8b4e22a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8b4e22a"}
43aa997
84e9b17
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"84e9b17"}
97349cb
43a98c1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"43a98c1"}
286c40f
79cfa3d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"79cfa3d"}
The bad commit is **`6aa2812`** ("switch to prod").
**Reasoning:**
- `4889435` Initial commit: PASS
- `6a8534c` configure localhost: PASS
- `6aa2812` switch to prod: **FAIL** ← first failure
- `772c9bc` add pool config: FAIL
- `1469263` add port config: FAIL
The build transitions from PASS to FAIL at commit `6aa2812`, and all subsequent commits remain broken. This makes `6aa2812` ("switch to prod") the commit that introduced the bug.
6e82a89
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "6e82a89"}
ef621ba
5499b8c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "5499b8c"}
## Analysis
Looking at the test results in chronological order (oldest first):
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| 33994f2 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 68d553b | configure localhost | ✅ PASS |
| **33e4c22** | **switch to prod** | ❌ **FAIL** ← first failure |
| 0d58d28 | add pool config | ❌ FAIL |
| 4010021 | add port config | ❌ FAIL |
## Bad Commit
**`33e4c22`** — "switch to prod"
## Reasoning
The build was **passing** through `68d553b` (configure localhost) and then **failed** starting at `33e4c22` (switch to prod), remaining broken in all subsequent commits. This PASS→FAIL transition point identifies `33e4c22` as the commit that introduced the bug.
The subject line "switch to prod" strongly supports this conclusion—switching to a production configuration likely introduced an environment-specific setting (e.g., an unreachable prod host, missing credentials, or invalid endpoint) that breaks the build/tests, which the later "add pool config" and "add port config" commits merely inherited.
**Suggested next step:** Inspect the changes with `git show 33e4c22` to find the specific config change that broke things.
95fd1da
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "95fd1da"}
The bad commit is **8d4cefa** ("switch to prod").
The test results show a clear transition from PASS to FAIL at this commit:
- `ab1044e` (configure localhost): **PASS**
- `8d4cefa` (switch to prod): **FAIL** ← first failure
- All subsequent commits remain FAIL
Since `8d4cefa` is the first commit where the build broke (and all following commits inherit the failure), it introduced the bug.
92dfc12
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "92dfc12"}
The bad commit is **e695004** ("switch to prod").
The tests pass through `89044ed` and start failing at `e695004`, remaining broken in all subsequent commits. Since `e695004` is the first commit where the build breaks, it's the one that introduced the bug.
c58aed2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c58aed2"}
The bad commit is **`fe9d219`** ("switch to prod").
**Reasoning:**
Looking at the test results in chronological order (oldest first):
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| d30c311 | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| eedc552 | configure localhost | ✅ PASS |
| **fe9d219** | **switch to prod** | ❌ **FAIL** |
| 342757f | add pool config | ❌ FAIL |
| fc8f29d | add port config | ❌ FAIL |
The transition from PASS → FAIL happens exactly at commit `fe9d219`. Everything before it passes, and everything from it onward fails. This is the commit that introduced the bug.
**Answer: `fe9d219`**
c489bf8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c489bf8"}
The bad commit is **1596a85**
c5ae1a2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c5ae1a2"}
b425663
6aa8e6e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6aa8e6e"}
## Analysis
Looking at the test results from oldest to newest:
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| 40aca9c | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| cbcbec7 | configure localhost | ✅ PASS |
| **b697050** | **switch to prod** | ❌ **FAIL** |
| 3b3ae88 | add pool config | ❌ FAIL |
| 210b38a | add port config | ❌ FAIL |
The build was passing through `cbcbec7` and began failing at `b697050`. All subsequent commits also fail, meaning the bug was never fixed — it was introduced at this commit and carried forward.
## Answer
**`b697050`** — *"switch to prod"*
This commit changed the configuration from localhost to a production environment, which broke the build (likely pointing to a server/host that is unreachable, misconfigured, or requires credentials not present in the test environment).
e8835f8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e8835f8"}
ea065d0
0fb8c36
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"0fb8c36"}
The bad commit is **3329416** (switch to prod), as it is the first commit where the build started failing.
a1fd8ff
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a1fd8ff"}
The bad commit is **bb12487** ("switch to prod"), as it's the first commit where the build failed, and all subsequent commits also fail.
f345f6c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f345f6c"}
The bad commit is **3ffe19e** ("switch to prod").
**Reasoning:** The test results show a clear transition from PASS to FAIL between commits `887053a` (configure localhost) and `3ffe19e` (switch to prod). Since `887053a` passed and `3ffe19e` is the first commit to fail, and all subsequent commits (`ba22942`, `9a7e0d6`) continue to fail, this indicates that `3ffe19e` introduced the breaking change. The subject line "switch to prod" suggests a configuration change (likely switching from a localhost/dev environment to a production environment) that broke the build, and this issue persisted through later commits since it was never fixed.
c2247b4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c2247b4"}
2936429 switch to prod
507c117
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"507c117"}
5415386 switch to prod
b00a597
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b00a597"}
13ae095 switch to prod
6db0742
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6db0742"}
**76b4192** ("switch to prod")
This is the first commit where the tests transition from PASS to FAIL, indicating it introduced the breaking change. All subsequent commits continue to fail, which is consistent with the bug being introduced here and remaining unfixed in later commits.
4ca1c25
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"4ca1c25"}
a2612bf
a2ec299
The bad commit is the one that first caused a test failure: **d834236** (subject line: "switch to prod").
59197f4
d75e1e8
8cf0780
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "8cf0780"
}
657145a
7833d83
ab7eee2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "ab7eee2"
}
c0aaf07
cf2a89d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "cf2a89d"
}
5e299fc
5379045
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "5379045"}
f5202c2
63f4057
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"63f4057"}
452b6de
5326a9a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "5326a9a"
}
622b895
60b03cb
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "60b03cb"
}
The bad commit is **095aa53** (switch to prod).
This is the first commit where the test fails, and all subsequent commits continue to fail. Since commits are listed newest first, the oldest commit that shows a failure is the one that introduced the bug.
60917db
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "60917db"
}
60cee61
74b9b7c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "74b9b7c"
}
b352eeb
b53a0a4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b53a0a4"}
bf75a10
9693e35
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "9693e35" }
057f2ee
1482de2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1482de2"}
Based on the test results, the first commit that fails is `ac412a2` ("switch to prod"). All commits after that also fail, but since `ac412a2` is the first failure when testing from oldest to newest, that is the commit that introduced the bug.
**ac412a2**
8ae4667
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "8ae4667" }
05b0f2e
152c794
30e1bfc
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"30e1bfc"}
c14f13f
5fda73e
e7fe035
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e7fe035"}
Based on the test results, the bad commit is:
**f280cb2 switch to prod**
This is the first commit in the history where the tests started failing. All commits before it (fbd6ebb and f13fa19) passed, and all commits after it (3ed8e6f and eeb5fa9) also failed, indicating that f280cb2 is the commit that introduced the bug.
5368371
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "5368371"}
5ea57b5
4bfa86f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4bfa86f"}
The first bad commit is **244849c** (switch to prod).
d2e0bbf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d2e0bbf"
}
9e19bbf
1f19050
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "1f19050"}
fe52ed7
428bf21
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"428bf21"}
Based on the commit history and test results provided:
1. **40e7d3c** (Initial commit): **PASS**
2. **4f28ad2** (configure localhost): **PASS**
3. **915c29c** (switch to prod): **FAIL**
4. **e5ff292** (add pool config): **FAIL**
5. **379fbd2** (add port config): **FAIL**
The first commit that introduced the failure is **915c29c**.
915c29c
442d23a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "442d23a"
}
The bad commit is **6135ea1** (switch to prod).
This is the first commit where the tests failed after previously passing in the commit `7bc10cf`.
579b349
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "579b349"}
The bad commit is **cabaeec** (or the subject line "switch to prod").
**Reasoning:**
Looking at the test results provided:
* `2622b9c` (configure localhost) was the last commit that resulted in a **PASS**.
* `cabaeec` (switch to prod) was the first commit that resulted in a **FAIL**.
Since the builds were passing until `cabaeec` was introduced, that is the commit that broke the build.
125a100
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "125a100"}
The bad commit hash is **95d0e90** (switch to prod).
6a2ed3a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "6a2ed3a"}
The bad commit is **fe48581** (switch to prod).
**Reasoning:**
The test results show that the build was passing at `5846d3b` ("configure localhost") and started failing at `fe48581` ("switch to prod"). Therefore, `fe48581` is the commit that introduced the issue.
b40aa17
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "b40aa17"
}
41e0fbb
c9ed39d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c9ed39d"}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **8864c8d** ("switch to prod").
fe378ff
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "fe378ff"
}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **4cc1d96** (or **switch to prod**).
Looking at the test results, it is the first commit to fail (exit code 1) after the previous commits passed (exit code 0), and all subsequent commits continue to fail because the repository is in a broken state.
4993bde
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4993bde"}
ef35c26
2c30918
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "2c30918"}
74dc734
6449552
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "6449552"
}
26fc51f
2f208ab
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "2f208ab"}
`92d2d1b` (or "switch to prod")
c981cd9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c981cd9"}
215f260
e89d2aa
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "e89d2aa"}
d64ab5d
b9e388c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b9e388c"}
59e3a5a
641c777
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"641c777"}
174176e
a38218c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "a38218c"}
8099a87
98499db
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"98499db"}
Based on the test results, the commit that introduced the bug is **4aac369** (or "switch to prod"), as it is the first commit to fail after a passing build.
e7ff49c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e7ff49c"}
`ca27263` (or "switch to prod")
851f034
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"851f034"}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **f80c2a7** (switch to prod).
534da8e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "534da8e"
}
The commit that introduced the bug is **2260028** (switch to prod).
eeeb7c3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"eeeb7c3"}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **ab27e47** (or "switch to prod").
5e2c868
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5e2c868"}
**bdcad93** (or "switch to prod")
44181d3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "44181d3"
}
7f21920
cbb951c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "cbb951c"}
591f5fb
d717cbd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d717cbd"
}
ddaa079
9116ea4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "9116ea4"}
e7184c2
f2034ed
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "f2034ed"
}
d5f702b
d682930
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d682930"
}
dd38055
5c69dd9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "5c69dd9"
}
28a9f88
2aa691e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2aa691e"}
c11b9a3
7168683
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "7168683"}
43aa647
c3213c7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "c3213c7"}
f43d7d3
1501665
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "1501665"}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is `c47` (the first 7 characters of commit hash `c47...b3`).
**Reasoning:**
- The test results show that `8229233` (Initial commit) passed.
- `2bb8a72` (configure localhost) also passed.
- Starting from `c4729b3` (switch to prod), the tests begin to fail (`c4729b3` and onward all have exit code 1).
- Therefore, `c4729b3` is the first commit where the build fails, indicating it introduced the bug.
903a02b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "903a02b"
}
Looking at the test results, the first failure occurs at commit **60340b8** ("switch to prod"). All later commits (515fc42 and e1b7afd) also fail, but they inherit the bug from the commit that introduced it.
Since the tests pass at 6b4ed21 ("configure localhost") and fail at 60340b8 ("switch to prod"), the bad commit that introduced the bug is:
**60340b8** (switch to prod)
474fd8c switch to prod
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"474fd8c switch to prod"}
2be0e75
edd5e14
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "edd5e14"
}
7330ad1
0f45c3e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "0f45c3e"
}
e97d47c
fbc628a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "fbc628a"
}
cfbf01f
8887c64
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "8887c64"
}
a72f2f9
9261ab3 (switch to prod)
52aecc9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"52aecc9"}
b3eec99
aea44fb
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"aea44fb"}
8359c6f
The bad commit is **f7c2b88** (switch to prod).
**Reasoning:**
- `faf2a9c` (Initial commit): PASS ✅
- `26a3124` (configure localhost): PASS ✅
-`f7c2b88` (switch to prod): ❌ FAIL — this is the first commit where tests broke
- `6e57f1b` (add pool config): ❌ FAIL (inherits the broken state)
- `96b995f` (add port config): ❌ FAIL (inherits the broken state)
The build was working correctly through the "configure localhost" commit, but failed immediately after the "switch to prod" commit, making **f7c2b88** the commit that introduced the bug. This is also semantically consistent — switching to a production configuration is a common source of broken builds.
98dd2fd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "98dd2fd" }
861bcf2
f5d2d57
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "f5d2d57"}
The bad commit is **af359ac** (switch to prod).
**Reasoning:** By comparing the test results in chronological order:
- `15c5b74` (Initial commit) → PASS
- `cec8ebf` (configure localhost) → PASS
- `af359ac` (switch to prod) → **FAIL** ← First failure introduced here
- `587a0e0` (add pool config) → FAIL
- `e67542d` (add port config) → FAIL
The build was passing before this commit and began failing immediately after it. The subsequent failures are just the build remaining broken (since the bug was never fixed). The "switch to prod" commit is the one that introduced the bug.
59a7d0d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "59a7d0d" }
80b7940
d823980
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d823980"}
Based on the test results, the build was working fine up until commit `32eb191 switch to prod`, which introduced the failure. All subsequent commits (`3cac3bf` and `d505fc1`) also failed, indicating that the bug was introduced in `32eb191`.
The bad commit is:
`32eb191` (or the subject line "switch to prod")
30d1ac4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "30d1ac4"}
The first commit where the tests failed is **ea0e5f1 switch to prod**. This is the commit that introduced the bug, as all previous commits (Initial commit and configure localhost) passed, while this and all subsequent commits failed.
ea0e5f1
a037a28 switch to prod
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "a037a28 switch to prod"}
The test results show that the build **passed** at commit `1233b19` (configure localhost) and **failed** starting at commit `5a5fc9e` (switch to prod). Since all subsequent commits also fail, the bug was introduced by the first failing commit.
The bad commit is: **5a5fc9e**
d58f771
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d58f771"}
f26fbc2
a9e6456
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "a9e6456"}
The bad commit is **1e96b34** (subject line: "switch to prod"), as this is the first commit in the history (when going from oldest to newest) where the tests start failing.
The test results show:
- 85b3550: PASS
- 4eb96b9: PASS
- 1e96b34: FAIL (first failure)
- 5be0e0a: FAIL
- 8420bdf: FAIL
Thus, the commit that introduced the bug is **1e96b34**.
8c03ee8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "8c03ee8"}
The first failing commit in the test results is **b0a6c36** (`switch to prod`). All prior commits pass, and all subsequent commits continue to fail, indicating this is the commit that introduced the bug.
**Answer:** b0a6c36
a96922a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "a96922a"}
2eff07d
8536ca9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "8536ca9" }
c5b0392
68cb4e5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"68cb4e5"}
fcbc179
eb65b05
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw)
{
"commit": "eb65b05"
}
d9bd988
d8e6a90
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"d8e6a90"}
The first commit where tests start failing is:
**`48eba48`** (subject: *switch to prod*)
f43e510
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f43e510"}
**d8de2fc** — *switch to prod*
34e9b6f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "34e9b6f" }
The first bad commit is **a434703** (`switch to prod`).
43941d6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "43941d6" }
3caba48
77703dd
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "77703dd" }
**Bad commit: `06deec8` — "switch to prod"**
**Reasoning:**
- `84ed0b4` (Initial commit): PASS
- `5df9662` (configure localhost): PASS
- `06deec8` (switch to prod): **FAIL** ← first failure
- Subsequent commits (`8bffb50`, `5293130`) also fail, but they only inherit the broken state.
Since `5df9662` passes and `06deec8` is the first commit where the build breaks, the bug was introduced in **`06deec8` ("switch to prod")** — likely a hardcoded production configuration that doesn't work in the build/test environment.
**Bad commit: `c3b74d7` — "switch to prod"**
**Reasoning:**
Walking through the history from oldest to newest:
| Commit | Subject | Result |
|--------|---------|--------|
| f1924ff | Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 88e19c5 | configure localhost | ✅ PASS |
| **c3b74d7** | **switch to prod** | ❌ **FAIL** ← first failure |
| ad89a27 | add pool config | ❌ FAIL |
| d53a63f | add port config | ❌ FAIL |
The build passes at `88e19c5` but fails at the very next commit, `c3b74d7`. The later commits (`ad89a27`, `d53a63f`) fail only because they inherit the bug — they are *effects*, not the cause.
The transition from PASS → FAIL pinpoints **`c3b74d7` ("switch to prod")** as the commit that introduced the bug. This also makes logical sense: switching the configuration from localhost to production values (e.g., hardcoded prod hostnames/credentials) is a classic way to break a build or test environment.
This is exactly what `git bisect` would conclude: the first bad commit is the boundary where the tests flipped from passing to failing.
The bad commit is **0fa696a** ("switch to prod").
This is the first commit where the build transitions from PASS to FAIL: the preceding commit `d2e7052` passes, while `0fa696a` and all subsequent commits fail. Therefore, the bug was introduced in `0fa696a`.
**097d117** — "switch to prod"
The build passed at `1475dca` (configure localhost) and first failed at `097d117` (switch to prod). Since all subsequent commits also fail, `097d117` is the commit that introduced the bug.
**Bad commit: `39e82d1` — "switch to prod"**
**Reasoning:**
- `b0c9cc4` (Initial commit): PASS
- `351e5b8` (configure localhost): PASS
- `39e82d1` (switch to prod): **FAIL** ← first failure appears here
- `01cc4f1` and `fbdaf5c`: FAIL (but these just inherit the already-broken state)
Since the build passed at `351e5b8` and first failed at `39e82d1`, the commit **39e82d1** ("switch to prod") is the one that introduced the bug — switching to a prod configuration that presumably broke the build.
**Bad commit: `b0004ee` ("switch to prod")**
**Reasoning:**
- Ordering the commits from oldest to newest: `b1c71ef` → `c9608df` → `b0004ee` → `2cb022c` → `d24f550`
- `b1c71ef` and `c9608df` both **PASS**, so the build was healthy up through `c9608df`
- `b0004ee` is the **first commit to FAIL**, and every subsequent commit also fails
Since `b0004ee` is where the test results transition from passing to failing, it is the commit that introduced the bug.
**Bad commit: `0abdde5` ("switch to prod")**
Reasoning: The first failing commit is the one that introduced the bug. The tests pass at `a6df5ad` (Initial commit) and `8ce4d97` (configure localhost), but the build first fails at `0abdde5` (switch to prod). All subsequent commits (`dfa7c05`, `b41e9c7`) also fail because they inherit the broken state introduced by `0abdde5`.
If you were bisecting, `git bisect` would identify `0abdde5` as the first bad commit — likely switching to production settings broke the build because prod resources/credentials aren't available in the test/build environment.
**Bad commit: `7e91349` ("switch to prod")**
**Reasoning:** This is essentially a git bisect problem — the bad commit is the first one where the tests start failing:
| Commit | Result |
|--------|--------|
| f1e9f61 Initial commit | ✅ PASS |
| 74ea76f configure localhost | ✅ PASS |
| **7e91349 switch to prod** | ❌ **FAIL** ← first failure |
| bc53afe add pool config | ❌ FAIL |
| e8e4dbd add port config | ❌ FAIL |
The build passed at `74ea76f` and began failing at `7e91349`, with every subsequent commit also failing. This means the bug was introduced in **`7e91349` — "switch to prod"** (likely switching the config to production settings broke something that the test environment depends on, e.g., pointing at a production host/port the tests can't reach).
**Bad commit: `8fdcf40` — "switch to prod"**
**Reasoning:**
- `ddc0301` (Initial commit): PASS ✅
- `b0c042c` (configure localhost): PASS ✅
- `8fdcf40` (switch to prod): **FAIL** ❌ ← first failure
- `52f4416` (add pool config): FAIL ❌
- `d866ecb` (add port config): FAIL ❌
The build passes through `b0c042c` and breaks at `8fdcf40`, with every subsequent commit continuing to fail. This means `8fdcf40` ("switch to prod") is the commit that introduced the bug — likely a hardcoded production configuration (e.g., database host, credentials, or endpoint) that isn't valid in the test/build environment. The later commits (`52f4416`, `d866ecb`) inherit the failure but didn't cause it.
02046b5
82e020f
8934396
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "8934396"
}
bec0f86
99790ca
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "99790ca"
}
d7aefce
f6b867d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "f6b867d"
}
9e3ff4d switch to prod
f61c26c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "f61c26c"
}
dad1a76 (the “switch to prod” commit) introduced the failing build.
0323274
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "0323274" }
79fbf12
5edc623
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "5edc623"
}
f600030
84aab2b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "84aab2b"
}
85f3d5d
838c9d8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "838c9d8"
}
To determine which commit introduced the bug, we need to find the **first commit** in the history (from oldest to newest) where the test **failed**, because the problem states that **one bad commit broke the build**, implying that all commits before it passed, and that commit and all after it failed.
We are given the test results **in oldest-first order**:
```
ede6dc9 Initial commit: PASS (exit code 0)
c292a5a configure localhost: PASS (exit code 0)
6ecab27 switch to prod: FAIL (exit code 1)
e8f5b44 add pool config: FAIL (exit code 1)
2ecc1eb add port config: FAIL (exit code 1)
```
Let’s map this to the commit history (newest first) provided:
```
2ecc1eb add port config ← newest
e8f5b44 add pool config
6ecab27 switch to prod
c292a5a configure localhost
ede6dc9 Initial commit ← oldest
```
Now, aligning test results with commits in **chronological order (oldest to newest)**:
| Commit Hash | Subject | Test Result |
|---------------|-----------------------|-------------|
| ede6dc9 | Initial commit | PASS |
| c292a5a | configure localhost | PASS |
| 6ecab27 | switch to prod | FAIL |
| e8f5b44 | add pool config | FAIL |
| 2ecc1eb | add port config | FAIL |
We see that:
- `ede6dc9` and `c292a5a` passed.
- Starting at `6ecab27`, the tests fail and continue to fail in all subsequent commits.
Since **only one commit broke the build**, and the failure starts at `6ecab27`, this must be the **bad commit** that introduced the bug.
All commits after it (`e8f5b44`, `2ecc1eb`) inherited the failure, which is consistent with a single bad commit breaking the build and never being fixed.
### ✅ Answer:
**6ecab27**
(First 7 characters of the hash: `6ecab27`)
Alternatively, if asked for the subject line: `switch to prod`
But the question says: *"Your answer should be the commit hash (e.g., 'abc1234') or the commit subject line."*
Since the example shows a hash, and we are to identify the bad commit, the most precise and expected answer is the **hash**.
### Final Answer:
**6ecab27**
bd205ff
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "bd205ff"
}
1d9cbf0
9d4d1fc
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "9d4d1fc"
}
4cd1665
1762a85
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1762a85"}
0f9ceaa
aa9e0d8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"aa9e0d8"}
7064ec1
5735218
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"5735218"}
d4cb66e
ca3083a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ca3083a"}
70edd11
8571166
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8571166"}
27c4892 switch to prod
9e2fd65
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"9e2fd65"}
8142c6d
4d1125f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"4d1125f"}
**7e7b99d**
6b5d90c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6b5d90c"}
f1217bd
ab1063a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"ab1063a"}
b943166
1d7265c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1d7265c"}
1be7014
df2ea3f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"df2ea3f"}
b650034
02d1629
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"02d1629"}
b456234
cc936aa
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"cc936aa"}
c4d193a
f6cd01a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f6cd01a"}
5ab4fd2
1153b08
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1153b08"}
259afa5
7fc77a2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"7fc77a2"}
22ca9bb
6d62066
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6d62066"}
986c460
2268b7b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"2268b7b"}
b2421e1
b55491d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b55491d"}
b1e9162
9d6c1b9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"9d6c1b9"}
d337100
81f894b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"81f894b"}
e435c8c
552dffe
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"552dffe"}
160783e
e074cd5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e074cd5"}
1870952
bac41e3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"bac41e3"}
e20821b
1e2e85c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1e2e85c"}
42e90e8
1c3eb99
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1c3eb99"}
4f6f830
843ac8b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"843ac8b"}
fdba63f
fac547a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"fac547a"}
5b69775
46a24fe
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"46a24fe"}
0cec454
f5a6e5e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f5a6e5e"}
aab76ca
e6efc9b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"e6efc9b"}
492a5b8
6407d1a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"6407d1a"}
50b287c
b5c2222
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b5c2222"}
1d92afb
18bb0fe
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"18bb0fe"}
077f6a3
06e5370
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"06e5370"}
fb38944
b557f70
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b557f70"}
1fcb758
fec391b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"fec391b"}
eea7f45
1f5402a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"1f5402a"}
9a51c7e (switch to prod)
98497fc
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"98497fc"}
09c5487 (switch to prod)
1d38499
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "1d38499" }
f93e3bf (switch to prod)
d9193b0 switch to prod
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "d9193b0 switch to prod" }
bab7d4e
c1d51bf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "c1d51bf"
}
92f397d (subject: “switch to prod”)
91e5ab0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"91e5ab0"}
627c465
ed16ee4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "ed16ee4" }
9503cb9 # switch to prod
69e13b4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"69e13b4"}
The bad commit is **ce11ff1** (subject: “switch to prod”).
a6895a2
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "a6895a2" }
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **4fffeb9** ("switch to prod"). This is the first commit in the history where the tests began failing, indicating it introduced the issue. Subsequent commits built on top of this broken state, hence they also failed, but the root cause is 4fffeb9.
**Answer:** 4fffeb9
bc01adf
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "bc01adf"}
The bad commit is the one where the build first started failing, which is `fd8f957` ("switch to prod"). The test results show that the commit before it (`ee68a11`) passed, and all subsequent commits (`fd8f957`, `70170ff`, `33d1dd4`) failed. This indicates that `fd8f957` introduced the bug.
**Answer:** fd8f957
c252007
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"c252007"}
The bad commit that introduced the bug is **828242d**.
This is the first commit where the test fails. All subsequent commits also fail, indicating the issue wasn't fixed afterward, confirming that the bug was introduced in this commit. The commit subject is "switch to prod".
Answer: `828242d`
4617d22
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "4617d22"}
The test results show that commits after 'f11c240' (switch to prod) are failing. Since 'f11c240' is the first failing commit and '8e9de1d' (configure localhost) was the last passing one before it, the bad commit must be 'f11c240'.
**Answer:** f11c240
29e055a
d8dd7f4
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "d8dd7f4"}
The bad commit is 7cf35c8. This is the first commit in the history where the tests failed, indicating it introduced the bug. Subsequent commits (eb67018 and 0e498a0) built upon this broken state, but the root cause originated in 7cf35c8.
Answer: 7cf35c8
a95ffb5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "a95ffb5"
}
The bad commit is **b6e1e8a** (first 7 characters of "switch to prod").
**Reasoning:**
- The test results show that all commits up to `f6a3297` pass.
- The first failure occurs at `b6e1e8a` ("switch to prod"), which introduces the bug.
- Subsequent commits (`e184f6a`, `4d08837`) inherit the broken state, but the root cause is `b6e1e8a`.
ce5996f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ce5996f"}
The bad commit is 2feaeab.
**Reasoning**:
- The test results show failures starting at `2feaeab switch to prod`.
- All commits after it (`92d6593`, `1682367`) inherit the broken state, but the **first failure** occurs at `2feaeab`.
- Since no subsequent commit fixes the issue, `2feaeab` must be the commit that introduced the bug.
Answer: `2feaeab`
73c1852
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "73c1852"}
0300ff9
b39616f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "b39616f"}
The bad commit is **696683c** (switch to prod).
**Reasoning:**
- The first test that failed was at commit `696683c` ("switch to prod").
- All subsequent commits (`e80b43b`, `dedc458`) also failed, which is expected because they built on top of the broken commit.
- Since the test passed before `696683c` (at `76bbba5`), this commit introduced the build-breaking change.
a7d0569
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "a7d0569"}
Looking at the test results chronologically:
1. `12adb33` Initial commit: **PASS**
2. `eeb5115` configure localhost: **PASS**
3. `0d248d9` switch to prod: **FAIL**
The first failure occurs at commit `0d248d9` with the subject "switch to prod". This is the bad commit that introduced the bug. All subsequent commits also fail because they build upon this broken state.
**Answer: 0d248d9**
04ee10c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "04ee10c"}
Based on the test results, I can see that:
- Commits e29e914 (Initial commit) and e456ff7 (configure localhost) both PASS
- Commit 8f97712 (switch to prod) is the first one that FAILS
Since the build was passing before 8f97712 and starts failing with that commit, this is the bad commit that introduced the bug.
**Bad commit: 8f97712** (subject: "switch to prod")
0fce530
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "0fce530"}
Looking at the test results chronologically:
1. c3d6c9b Initial commit: **PASS**
2. f9c4ce5 configure localhost: **PASS**
3. a320cab switch to prod: **FAIL** ← First failure
4. 66b5aa4 add pool config: **FAIL**
5. 110163f add port config: **FAIL**
The bad commit is **a320cab** ("switch to prod") - this is the first commit where tests started failing.
54cc47b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "54cc47b"}
Looking at the test results, I can see that the build passed for the first two commits (dfdd750 and 4351261), but then failed starting with commit 7d0a79b "switch to prod" and continued to fail for all subsequent commits.
This indicates that commit 7d0a79b "switch to prod" introduced the bug that broke the build.
The bad commit is: **7d0a79b** (or "switch to prod" by commit subject line).
6093647
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "6093647"}
Based on the test results, I can see that:
- Commits `08da683` (Initial commit) and `2436361` (configure localhost) both PASS
- Commit `2d3e138` (switch to prod) and all subsequent commits FAIL
The bad commit is **2d3e138** "switch to prod" - this is the first commit where the tests started failing. Since this commit introduced the failure and all subsequent commits also fail (likely because they build on the broken state), this is the commit that broke the build.
95e2d12
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "95e2d12"}
130ed6c
5986a39
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "5986a39"
}
492df62
bf9187f
b2331d8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "b2331d8"
}
f754269
b3aabd6
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "b3aabd6"
}
b5059b5
2c81fa5
199126a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "199126a"
}
1e62047
46750d3
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "46750d3" }
f98e18f
bd7655f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "bd7655f"
}
0f52268
2f23e13
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "2f23e13"
}
212003f
d235050
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "d235050"
}
bc93138
`fb75991`
3020046
e4a7e65
365c412
244eea1
Based on the test results, the first commit that caused the tests to fail after previously passing is:
**9d8be4d** (subject: `switch to prod`)
cdb73a2
fcb2ee9
368f0f1
11c3a5d
The bad commit is **1081123** ("switch to prod").
**Reasoning:** Looking at the test results chronologically, the build passes at commit `8aa3620` (configure localhost) and first fails at commit `1081123` (switch to prod). Since all subsequent commits also fail, `1081123` is the commit that introduced the bug.
e384c7c
The bad commit is **`1eea2a6`** (subject: "switch to prod").
**Reasoning:** Looking at the test results from oldest to newest, the first two commits (`c4a2c58` and `40ca476`) pass. The first failure occurs at `1eea2a6 switch to prod`, making it the commit that introduced the bug. All subsequent commits (`1007b55` and `7527912`) continue to fail because they build on top of the broken state.
Based on the test results, we can perform a bisect-like analysis:
- `85b3550` (Initial commit): **PASS**
- `4eb96b9` (configure localhost): **PASS**
- `1e96b34` (switch to prod): **FAIL** ← First failure
- `5be0e0a` (add pool config): FAIL
- `8420bdf` (add port config): FAIL
The transition from PASS to FAIL occurs between `4eb96b9` and `1e96b34`. Therefore, the bad commit that introduced the bug is:
**1e96b34**
e627faa
The bad commit is **`8c85f73`** (`switch to prod`).
**Reasoning:** The commit `e3f7fa0 configure localhost` passes, and the very next commit `8c85f73 switch to prod` fails. This is the first commit that introduced the build failure.
The bad commit is **5b568ae** ("switch to prod").
**Reasoning:** The last passing commit is `7bf22ee` (configure localhost), and the first failing commit is `5b568ae` (switch to prod). Since the test results go from PASS → FAIL between these two commits, `5b568ae` is the commit that introduced the bug.
The bad commit is **`22fb685`** (`switch to prod`).
This is the first commit where the test transitions from PASS to FAIL. The previous commit (`8f714e9 configure localhost`) passed, and `22fb685` is where the build first broke.
174a230
The bad commit is **a88d0d5** ("switch to prod").
The test results show that `0e95cc7 configure localhost` passed, but the very next commit `a88d0d5 switch to prod` failed. This means `a88d0d5` is the first commit that broke the build.
ae703f3
f0d45b8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "f0d45b8"
}
a577bfc (switch to prod)
4498b2f
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "4498b2f" }
2038a0d (switch to prod)
b703919
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "b703919"}
ac6a131
5cd6e62
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "5cd6e62" }
2110470
6321fb5
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "6321fb5" }
58e8bb4 (or "switch to prod")
2b8c094
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "2b8c094"
}
f18ba72
f3653a8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "f3653a8"
}
c696cad
ddda79e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "ddda79e"}
98c96c3
9c5b52d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "9c5b52d"}
87aca20<|end_message|>
The first failing commit is **35fd04d** ("switch to prod").
f2eb9be
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "f2eb9be"}
The first commit that failed is **99fbf0d** ("switch to prod").
- e51d7b4 PASS
- 53ef13f PASS
- **99fbf0d FAIL** ← bug introduced here
- c22c188 FAIL
- f4e6646 FAIL
Answer: `99fbf0d` (or "switch to prod")
6764afe
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "6764afe" }
1e5c572
0ab438d
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "0ab438d"
}
The build first fails at **b11b9a1** (`switch to prod`), so that commit introduced the bug.
Answer: `b11b9a1` (or `switch to prod`)
bc70513
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "bc70513" }
35e5e34
baeb1aa
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "baeb1aa" }
99570eb
0b84129
0a64d4a
90c7480
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"90c7480"}
ae29765
The test results show a clear transition from PASS to FAIL. Specifically:
- 204e159 and 611dc3a both exit with code 0 (green).
- ae29765 is the first commit whose test run exits with code 1 (red).
All later commits (1bc1780, a66a8d9) also fail, but the regression was introduced exactly when “switch to prod” was committed; therefore that is the bad commit.
a00df29
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a00df29"}
2009b6b
73760ad
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"73760ad"}
fd0a8d8
The test results show a clean transition from PASS to FAIL. The two oldest commits (8729c91, 0893b6d) both exit with code 0; the next commit (fd0a8d8) is the first to exit with code 1. All later commits remain failing, which is consistent with fd0a8d8 being the single regression-inducing change. In a bisect-style search this is exactly the commit that would be reported as "first bad".
a93d26b
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"a93d26b"}
6540354
b8cd478
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"b8cd478"}
2a78543
The tests pass on the initial commit and the subsequent "configure localhost" commit. The first failure occurs on "switch to prod", and all later commits continue to fail. This identifies "switch to prod" (hash 2a78543) as the bad commit that introduced the regression.
8aee3ed
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"8aee3ed"}
66e4624
020ee6e
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"020ee6e"}
d55c613
f2bff01
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"f2bff01"}
bc6ddee
869e9e7
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"869e9e7"}
430f0a3
3faecb1
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"3faecb1"}
2a90ab8
bbd5013
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit":"bbd5013"}
cf1c101
783df87 switch to prod
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "783df87 switch to prod" }
891cbe6 switch to prod
2239837
5a1185e
6ab3ca0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "6ab3ca0" }
008f5a8
30957a9
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "30957a9" }
4fe5406
6cfac0a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "6cfac0a" }
ac4f290
92de0cf switch to prod
91f081c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) { "commit": "91f081c" }
c11a78f
bfb7076
0b753e9 switch to prod
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "0b753e9 switch to prod"
}
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
f460d3a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {
"commit": "f460d3a"
}
Failure: Expected target hash/prefix or subject 'switch to prod'
Invalid JSON. Output: The badcommit is `32effea` ("switch to prod"), as it is the first commit where the test fails.
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: cbe63e8
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
The bad commit is **a3186b7**, as it is the earliest commit after the successful ones and its failure caused subsequent commits to also fail.
**Answer:** a3186b7
Failure: Expected target hash/prefix or subject 'switch to prod'
Invalid JSON. Output: The bad commit is **f5675f0** — it was the first commit after switching to production and caused the build to fail, as confirmed by its failure status in the test output.
Answer: f5675f0
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
abc1234
JSON Schema
Structured Output
(raw) {"commit": "abc1234"}
Failure: Expected target hash/prefix or subject 'switch to prod'
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: b59a67c
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-d3b66374-6477-9083-a01f-c3fa566ad02c","request_id":"d3b66374-6477-9083-a01f-c3fa566ad02c"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-1a67aeb5-8f8c-98b9-aaba-70f1429da34c","request_id":"1a67aeb5-8f8c-98b9-aaba-70f1429da34c"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-48cce06e-8347-9508-aafc-2578c77909d5","request_id":"48cce06e-8347-9508-aafc-2578c77909d5"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-248e2330-2674-99fb-83c4-033824330bb5","request_id":"248e2330-2674-99fb-83c4-033824330bb5"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-f27db42c-3a2c-9168-ba1d-fe39211a2c7b","request_id":"f27db42c-3a2c-9168-ba1d-fe39211a2c7b"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-9f1ee1ab-f99e-91d4-8fe6-15b784561e0d"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-2a9b1c43-240a-9421-9a61-9987d3406295"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-82d488f3-e7e4-9032-be9f-aa8294483375"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-60fcede4-543d-9d95-a036-53b5a0790bf1"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-906ad75e-af07-954f-8f57-f4980a95b936"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': 'data: {"error":{"code":"invalid_parameter_error","param":null,"message":"\'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-714e10b5-2e50-9009-ab94-eeb59d5302f1"}\n\n', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-8b50ea5a-ac59-975f-96fd-40bfe14b3c9f","request_id":"8b50ea5a-ac59-975f-96fd-40bfe14b3c9f"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-29e0473d-6845-99ea-b6f0-a7f77221fa40","request_id":"29e0473d-6845-99ea-b6f0-a7f77221fa40"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-18f08b24-3010-91a2-bb16-f97de1f05f77","request_id":"18f08b24-3010-91a2-bb16-f97de1f05f77"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-68fe1b6b-4e6a-9594-8a5b-d84e82746d73","request_id":"68fe1b6b-4e6a-9594-8a5b-d84e82746d73"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-b176ed6a-1740-9510-ac62-118b473b3b23","request_id":"b176ed6a-1740-9510-ac62-118b473b3b23"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-22e3203a-36d7-9286-af96-6eedc3379f26","request_id":"22e3203a-36d7-9286-af96-6eedc3379f26"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-f7e0e4b6-3d2f-9674-85b1-74195dbf9fe5","request_id":"f7e0e4b6-3d2f-9674-85b1-74195dbf9fe5"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-be7d3faf-60ea-9f99-9b57-f01db29218b4","request_id":"be7d3faf-60ea-9f99-9b57-f01db29218b4"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-c98bfef4-6e42-9812-92dc-93d48e545fb8","request_id":"c98bfef4-6e42-9812-92dc-93d48e545fb8"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
(empty output)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Failure: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 400, 'metadata': {'raw': '{"error":{"message":"<400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: \'messages\' must contain the word \'json\' in some form, to use \'response_format\' of type \'json_object\'.","type":"invalid_request_error","param":null,"code":"invalid_parameter_error"},"id":"chatcmpl-27cf3b86-601a-978c-ab8a-393cf0f78664","request_id":"27cf3b86-601a-978c-ab8a-393cf0f78664"}', 'provider_name': 'Alibaba', 'is_byok': False}}, 'user_id': 'user_3FrVBkmFqVIuZ58dEh7AU8vhXUV'}
Invalid JSON. Output: b23cb9f{"commit": "b23cb9f"}
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: {
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 14584 column 2 (char 92980)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 14584 column 2 (char 92980)
Invalid JSON. Output: The first commit that fails is **8193f7b** (`switch to prod`), so that’s the one that introduced the bug.
Answer: `8193f7b` (or `switch to prod`)
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output:
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
Invalid JSON. Output: 0590987
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 2 (char 1)
Invalid JSON. Output: 5971a0a
JSON Schema
Structured Output
Structured Output Error
Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 5 (char 4)
Failure: Failed to parse structured JSON response: Extra data: line 1 column 5 (char 4)